skews

skews — CS2 Stats

76561197988143587[U:1:27877859]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,253Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,233Top 10% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11165 of 252617 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,064 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,233 +203 31 Aug – 16 Oct · 12 days played
25,86926,622peak 26,62231 Aug16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,064 +0 31 Aug – 9 Sept · 5 observations
2,0642,064peak 2,06431 Aug9 Sept
26,622Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,064Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,064
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 436 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 389 below peak (26,622)
  • -331 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,767 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGskewsFACEITLevel 9 · 2,064 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,233 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,064csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning53
Utility82

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −115ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility8.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 82 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.3
Utility8.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time546ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 521ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 7 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · cache, 7 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 2 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2613–1350%0.00
infernoA2012–860%-0.02
dust2C198–1142%-0.00
nukeS139–469%0.01
cacheB136–746%-0.02
anubisC52–340%-0.00
mirage—41–325%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,499Matches
49%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
72.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient49850%1.0814.6
Inferno45350%1.0614.8
Mirage40948%0.9914.0
Dust239549%1.0614.5
Nuke29755%1.0914.9
Anubis20239%0.9414.1
Cache6453%1.0614.3
Overpass5237%1.0215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
535msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
13.8%Flash assists
14.21HE damage / grenade
13.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0113%16 Oct →
dust213–70.0117%16 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0218%15 Oct →
mirage7–130.0525%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.037%13 Oct →
dust213–60.1017%13 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0114%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0017%12 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0220%12 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0415%11 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0312%9 Oct →
ancient13–10.0411%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.0116%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0512%9 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%9 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0124%9 Oct →
nuke10–130.0320%9 Oct →
mirage16–120.0324%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0121%8 Oct →
anubis8–130.0016%8 Oct →
cache6–0-0.0250%7 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0421%7 Oct →
cache1–13-0.1126%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.1116%7 Oct →
nuke13–100.0216%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0120%7 Oct →
inferno28–240.0116%6 Oct →
dust28–130.0017%6 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0215%6 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.087%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.0623%5 Oct →
dust213–70.0121%5 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0134%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0120%4 Oct →
inferno13–100.0413%2 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0821%2 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0517%2 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0316%2 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0012%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0414%1 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0120%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0123%1 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0529%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0119%1 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0414%1 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0717%1 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0223%29 Sept →
nuke11–130.0714%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0320%29 Sept →
ancient13–90.0611%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0118%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0211%26 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0217%26 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0523%26 Sept →
inferno4–130.0224%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0824%25 Sept →
ancient8–130.0021%21 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0224%21 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0712%21 Sept →
anubis14–160.0129%21 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0631%20 Sept →
dust219–16-0.0320%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0015%19 Sept →
cache10–130.0317%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0115%18 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0128%18 Sept →
ancient11–130.0326%17 Sept →
inferno13–30.0323%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0331%16 Sept →
nuke13–60.0728%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.1133%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0028%16 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0031%16 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0220%16 Sept →
nuke13–50.0221%16 Sept →
dust213–70.0924%15 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0014%14 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0130%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0719%14 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0432%13 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0012%13 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0718%13 Sept →
mirage11–130.0444%12 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0527%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0021%12 Sept →
cache13–100.0217%11 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0529%10 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0529%9 Sept →
ancient11–130.0013%3 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0325%3 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0629%3 Sept →
inferno9–130.0022%3 Sept →
inferno13–110.0220%2 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0217%2 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0726%2 Sept →
ancient13–100.0220%1 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0230%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.038%31 Aug →
ancient13–70.0319%30 Aug →
ancient13–60.0513%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.