Hyp

Hyp — CS2 Stats

76561197969421713[U:1:9155985]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,524Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,303Top 10% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10661 of 252617 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,179 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+267Premier CS Rating · 26,036 → 26,303

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,303 +73 31 Aug – 17 Oct · 17 days played
25,63927,066peak 27,06631 Aug17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,179 +0 31 Aug – 2 Sept · 2 observations
1,1791,179peak 1,17931 Aug2 Sept
27,066Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,179Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,179
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 763 below peak (27,066)
  • +664 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,697 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHypFACEITLevel 9 · 1,179 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,303 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,179csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning54
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.4
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time515ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 5 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 4–5 · nuke, 7 Oct →
266msFastest reaction time · 0–2 · cache, 11 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 50% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2211–1150%-0.00
infernoS1711–665%0.01
cacheB179–853%-0.02
dust2B158–753%0.01
nukeA159–660%0.01
mirageB105–550%-0.00
anubis—43–175%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

934Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient22447%0.9815.0
Dust218849%1.0715.5
Inferno16852%1.0215.2
Nuke11357%1.1214.9
Mirage10747%1.0014.4
Anubis6641%1.0215.6
Cache4347%0.9915.4
Overpass2157%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
515msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
11.94HE damage / grenade
15.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4353% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0325%17 Oct →
nuke13–20.0816%17 Oct →
dust213–4-0.1024%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.068%16 Oct →
dust214–160.1115%16 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0115%16 Oct →
dust213–100.0715%15 Oct →
nuke13–80.0516%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0416%13 Oct →
mirage13–70.0114%12 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0312%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0913%12 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0227%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.017%12 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.018%12 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0011%12 Oct →
dust28–130.0119%11 Oct →
mirage13–110.0334%11 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0010%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0511%11 Oct →
anubis13–40.0014%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0518%11 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0110%11 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0013%11 Oct →
cache0–2-0.100%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.066%11 Oct →
cache8–13-0.1012%11 Oct →
dust213–20.0115%11 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0424%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0621%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0316%10 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0712%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.1022%10 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.015%10 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0630%9 Oct →
ancient13–10.0710%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.039%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0014%9 Oct →
ancient8–130.0015%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0212%9 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.078%9 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0017%9 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.057%8 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0212%8 Oct →
nuke4–50.0556%7 Oct →
inferno28–240.0210%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0127%6 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.059%6 Oct →
nuke1–9-0.009%6 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0716%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.0533%5 Oct →
inferno13–40.1918%5 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0110%4 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0116%4 Oct →
nuke13–00.0716%3 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0415%3 Oct →
cache8–130.0414%2 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0020%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.015%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0620%1 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0220%1 Oct →
ancient8–130.0114%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0212%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.0120%1 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0216%1 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0213%1 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0413%1 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0116%29 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0313%29 Sept →
inferno13–110.0117%29 Sept →
ancient13–90.0312%29 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0426%28 Sept →
ancient9–130.0320%28 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0311%28 Sept →
cache9–130.0814%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.018%28 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0316%27 Sept →
inferno13–90.1020%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0813%27 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.006%27 Sept →
cache13–100.0512%27 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0520%27 Sept →
cache16–130.025%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0229%26 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0116%26 Sept →
ancient13–80.0014%26 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0122%26 Sept →
ancient13–50.0210%26 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0913%25 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0022%25 Sept →
ancient13–80.0519%23 Sept →
cache7–2-0.0413%23 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.049%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0116%20 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0615%20 Sept →
mirage13–00.0228%20 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0315%19 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0320%4 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0719%4 Sept →
ancient13–60.028%4 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.