lightworker — CS2 Stats

CG76561197961144793[U:1:879065]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,707Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,186Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,252Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#811 of 19288 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,130 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	52.4%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	17.3%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.14	1.08
Match win rate	44.1%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning58

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateLLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.3

Utility5.3

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.8

Utility5.3

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time518ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−2.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–10

13–0Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	26	16–10	62%	0.02
inferno	C	16	7–9	44%	0.00
nuke	A	16	10–6	63%	0.03
cache	S	15	11–4	73%	0.05
anubis	D	11	1–10	9%	0.01
mirage	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

249,978Lifetime kills

1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

4,368Matches

44.1%Match win rate

52.4%Headshot %

17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

11,186MVPs

4,196Hours (in match)

6,645Bombs planted

2,141Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47103,025

M4A4 / M4A1-S57,895

AWP21,900

P2000 / USP-S9,846

P2509,326

Glock-187,213

Desert Eagle7,164

Galil AR4,074

Five-SeveN3,869

FAMAS3,205

Lifetime map wins

15,912inferno

12,083dust2

7,326nuke

3,923train

2,568cbble

287vertigo

82aztec

69dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,747Matches

50%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

95.0ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	328	52%	1.29	19.5
Mirage	293	50%	1.21	18.4
Inferno	266	48%	1.33	19.6
Dust2	204	45%	1.21	18.4
Nuke	204	51%	1.40	19.9
Anubis	105	34%	1.08	17.1
Overpass	40	50%	1.17	17.0
Cache	24	58%	1.29	19.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

515msReaction time

31.6%T opening success

57.2%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

3.0%Flash assists

11.25HE damage / grenade

7.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3797 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.5803% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	7–13	-0.02	11%	28 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.10	29%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	24%	26 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	25%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	31%	26 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.00	20%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	15%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	14%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.09	24%	24 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	19%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	19%	20 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.10	9%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	22%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.07	23%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	25%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	13%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	32%	14 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.00	18%	14 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	22%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	21%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.09	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	27%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	25%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.10	19%	7 Aug →
inferno	25–22	0.02	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	24%	7 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	20%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.00	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	10%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	18%	6 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	22%	6 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	11%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	29%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.07	22%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.11	27%	30 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.04	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	21%	28 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	18%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	6–9	0.01	22%	27 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	26%	25 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	10%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	30%	24 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	28%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	18%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	32%	22 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.10	13%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	22%	22 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	44%	22 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	24%	20 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.07	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.05	100%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.03	54%	18 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.07	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.10	29%	18 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	21%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	30%	15 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	30%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	23%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	18%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.11	17%	14 Jul →
inferno	2–13	0.00	17%	14 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	14%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.03	25%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.09	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.03	17%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	22%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	25%	10 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	10–1	0.00	7%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	34%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.04	17%	9 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	20%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	23%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	19%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	24%	9 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.02	19%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	25%	8 Jul →