RĀPULIS

RĀPULIS — CS2 Stats

76561197987672801[U:1:27407073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,645Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
973Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,448Grey band · top ~81.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,448 -1,891 11 Sept – 13 Nov · 39 days played
3,8066,796peak 6,79611 Sept13 Nov
7,012Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,348 below peak (6,796)
  • +516 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 552 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate26.3%41.8%42.7%16.4% short
Shot accuracy6.5%12.2%11.2%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.980.980.99meets
Match win rate41.2%43.3%43.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRĀPULISFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER4,448 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning39
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLWTWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 705ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 20

  • 10–7–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility2.8
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 685ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning3.9
Utility2.8
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time679ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 8–1 · nuke, 22 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 18 Sept →
484msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2814–1450%-0.03
mirageC238–1535%-0.01
nukeB158–753%0.00
infernoA95–456%-0.02
ancientA95–456%-0.01
cacheA85–363%-0.01
anubisD71–614%-0.04
train—11–0100%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,121Lifetime kills
0.98K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,473Matches
41.2%Match win rate
26.3%Headshot %
6.5%Shot accuracy
3,469MVPs
973Hours (in match)
2,046Bombs planted
520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP8,416
AK-477,782
AUG1,496
Negev1,457
SG 5531,307
G3SG11,080

Lifetime map wins

7,071dust2
2,384inferno
2,198nuke
816train
442vertigo
279office
142italy
111aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
56%Win rate
0.51Avg K/D
41.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1050%0.658.2
Anubis633%0.456.8
Inferno540%0.446.8
Nuke580%0.428.2
Dust2450%0.608.5
Ancient367%0.476.3
Train2100%0.407.0
Overpass1100%0.365.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
64.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
685msReaction time
51.0%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.13HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1676% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.8465% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0827%13 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.0112%13 Nov →
anubis12–12-0.078%13 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0513%8 Nov →
cache13–4-0.0619%7 Nov →
dust213–4-0.0424%7 Nov →
cache2–13-0.0326%7 Nov →
dust211–13-0.1115%29 Oct →
dust24–13-0.067%29 Oct →
dust213–9-0.104%29 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0612%29 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.068%29 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0212%24 Oct →
mirage13–10.084%24 Oct →
cache13–50.0712%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0114%23 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0413%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0722%23 Oct →
nuke1–130.0116%22 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.019%22 Oct →
cache15–15-0.028%22 Oct →
nuke8–10.207%22 Oct →
inferno16–130.0113%21 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0417%20 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0114%20 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0110%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0215%18 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.044%18 Oct →
nuke9–130.0216%18 Oct →
cache13–90.0119%17 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0320%17 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.025%13 Oct →
ancient11–130.0213%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1013%12 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.069%12 Oct →
dust214–160.0121%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0213%9 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0611%8 Oct →
train13–9-0.106%8 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0011%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.054%8 Oct →
nuke13–110.028%8 Oct →
dust213–80.0616%8 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0412%6 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0017%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0514%5 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0211%5 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0713%3 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.045%2 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0216%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.099%1 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.018%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0410%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0413%30 Sept →
cache13–110.0611%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.012%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.049%29 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0114%28 Sept →
anubis9–130.0113%28 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0117%27 Sept →
ancient13–60.0030%27 Sept →
nuke13–60.0113%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0013%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0711%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0018%25 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.005%24 Sept →
dust28–130.0213%24 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.089%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0217%24 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0524%24 Sept →
dust23–13-0.1313%23 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.038%23 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.028%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0717%22 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.069%21 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0017%21 Sept →
mirage9–130.0014%20 Sept →
dust213–6-0.069%20 Sept →
dust213–90.0116%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0312%19 Sept →
dust213–30.0740%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0516%18 Sept →
dust213–70.0722%18 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0018%18 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0411%18 Sept →
dust213–40.0910%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.108%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.045%17 Sept →
mirage9–130.0418%17 Sept →
nuke13–90.0614%17 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0514%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0219%17 Sept →
dust213–16-0.109%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0115%15 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.036%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.048%11 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0915%11 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0815%11 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0716%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.