Luksuu

Luksuu — CS2 Stats

RU76561197986541784[U:1:26276056]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

812Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,038Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,086Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,086 +1,192 24 Sept – 30 Oct · 21 days played
13,83617,447peak 17,44724 Sept30 Oct
17,824Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,361 below peak (17,447)
  • +1,115 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,914 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate57.8%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.031.05above
Match win rate47.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLuksuuFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,086 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning59
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–48–12Last 10040%Win rateLLWWLLLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.9
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time605ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · vertigo, 29 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · nuke, 5 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · overpass, 1 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC218–1338%-0.00
ancientB1910–953%0.00
dust2C114–736%-0.03
anubisD102–820%0.01
vertigoA106–460%0.08
mirageD92–722%-0.01
cacheA95–456%0.01
infernoD72–529%-0.00
overpass—41–325%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,074Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
1,021Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
57.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,241MVPs
510Hours (in match)
779Bombs planted
460Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,864nuke
1,018inferno
798vertigo
729dust2
61lake
9train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

194Matches
49%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
84.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5149%1.2317.3
Anubis3566%1.2518.3
Ancient3250%1.1017.0
Nuke3043%1.0115.2
Inferno1631%0.8514.4
Dust21638%0.9315.8
Cache956%1.1516.1
Vertigo367%1.4023.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
609msReaction time
59.4%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
5.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–10-0.046%30 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0314%30 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0115%30 Oct →
ancient13–30.0717%29 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0024%29 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0018%29 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0114%29 Oct →
dust213–110.0513%28 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0618%23 Oct →
nuke13–90.0234%23 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.186%23 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0024%23 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0412%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0318%22 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0320%22 Oct →
vertigo2–90.0430%22 Oct →
cache13–110.0329%21 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0415%21 Oct →
ancient13–30.0417%21 Oct →
inferno13–110.0022%21 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.0816%21 Oct →
overpass12–12-0.0226%20 Oct →
ancient13–110.0919%20 Oct →
anubis12–120.0116%20 Oct →
nuke9–30.1418%20 Oct →
anubis8–130.0715%19 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0827%19 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0514%19 Oct →
anubis13–110.0715%19 Oct →
ancient13–50.1118%19 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0735%19 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0143%19 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.0328%19 Oct →
vertigo7–90.1038%19 Oct →
overpass9–60.0035%19 Oct →
ancient11–130.0325%18 Oct →
vertigo9–50.1247%16 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0224%16 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0116%16 Oct →
mirage10–130.0114%16 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0635%16 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0618%15 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0618%15 Oct →
cache13–80.0322%15 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.0635%13 Oct →
vertigo8–80.0926%12 Oct →
nuke1–130.0232%11 Oct →
mirage13–90.0318%8 Oct →
vertigo9–7-0.0242%8 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.100%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.0022%7 Oct →
nuke16–140.0316%7 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0511%7 Oct →
nuke6–9-0.1114%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.0119%5 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1019%5 Oct →
nuke13–00.04100%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.0233%4 Oct →
anubis4–130.0221%4 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0214%4 Oct →
ancient13–20.0330%4 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0115%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0627%4 Oct →
ancient15–150.0415%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.067%2 Oct →
nuke10–130.1822%2 Oct →
inferno9–130.0822%1 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0215%1 Oct →
nuke12–120.0315%1 Oct →
anubis10–10.0116%1 Oct →
overpass3–9-0.0222%1 Oct →
overpass8–80.0623%1 Oct →
nuke13–00.0171%1 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0516%1 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.100%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0220%30 Sept →
vertigo13–40.2027%29 Sept →
cache13–80.0919%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0222%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.1126%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0717%29 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0323%28 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0116%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0023%28 Sept →
vertigo13–80.1622%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0123%28 Sept →
mirage8–130.0723%28 Sept →
anubis7–130.0323%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0726%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0119%27 Sept →
dust26–130.0222%27 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0426%27 Sept →
vertigo9–40.0216%27 Sept →
vertigo9–0-0.0033%27 Sept →
mirage14–160.0114%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0920%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0314%25 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0331%25 Sept →
cache11–130.0230%24 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0328%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.