Nebukat 🐰☂ — CS2 Stats

DE76561197984485138[U:1:24219410]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,618Tracked matches32%Win rate2023Tracked since

4,518Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating7,525Light Blue band · top ~66.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#179667 of 239581 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 5 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,525 -2,100 5 Aug – 20 Sept · 15 days played

11,429Peak Premier in tracked matches

21Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

3,801 below peak (11,326)
-2,023 over 30 days · declining
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,475 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	50	—	—
Win rate	34%	—	—
K/D	0.91	—	—
Headshot %	51%	—	—

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 23 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	50.3%	42.7%	43.8%	above
Shot accuracy	0.8%	11.3%	12.0%	11.3% short
Kill/death ratio	0.82	0.99	1.02	0.20 short
Match win rate	40.2%	43.9%	44.7%	4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning46

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–45–12Last 10043%Win rateLTLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

8–9–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 626ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4

Utility4.5

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning4.6

Utility4.5

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time632ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms

Headshot accuracy17.9%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 23 Aug →

37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 27 Aug →

484msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · dust2, 26 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	43	20–23	47%	0.00
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.01
cache	D	11	2–9	18%	-0.03
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.02
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
fachwerk	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

83,227Lifetime kills

0.82K/D

5,691Matches

40.2%Match win rate

50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players

0.8%Shot accuracy

9,999MVPs

2,245Hours (in match)

6,323Bombs planted

1,097Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,455

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,704

Desert Eagle7,984

P2000 / USP-S4,464

Glock-184,390

AWP2,712

SSG 082,411

MAC-102,239

MP92,039

FAMAS1,527

Lifetime map wins

17,398dust2

8,207inferno

6,192nuke

3,038vertigo

977office

255train

88italy

27dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches

50%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

79.0ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	10	50%	0.66	11.1
Dust2	7	57%	0.83	13.7
Anubis	7	43%	1.05	17.9
Nuke	4	50%	0.86	12.3
Mirage	4	50%	0.83	15.5
Ancient	2	50%	0.74	10.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.60	9.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.21	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.1%Spray accuracy

78.1%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

633msReaction time

38.0%T opening success

51.8%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

7.4%Flash assists

4.60HE damage / grenade

7.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4671 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.0081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.00	19%	20 Sept →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	21%	20 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	11%	19 Sept →
train	13–11	0.06	18%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.07	26%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	13%	19 Sept →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	17%	19 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.01	17%	19 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.06	18%	19 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	12%	19 Sept →
overpass	12–12	-0.02	15%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.06	19%	18 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	18%	16 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.01	16%	16 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	18%	13 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.01	19%	13 Sept →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	10%	13 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	24%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	20%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.02	27%	10 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	28%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–16	0.03	28%	10 Sept →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	12%	10 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	13%	10 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	12%	10 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	20%	10 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	16%	10 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.03	19%	10 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.09	19%	9 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	10%	9 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	23%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.07	15%	1 Sept →
ancient	1–13	-0.05	15%	1 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.02	20%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.11	16%	1 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	20%	1 Sept →
dust2	16–13	0.01	15%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	15%	30 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.09	18%	30 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.10	24%	29 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	36%	29 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.02	27%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	13%	29 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	19%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–0	0.08	9%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	23%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	29%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	37%	27 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	8%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.05	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.07	22%	26 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.05	8%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	10%	26 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	16%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	8%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.12	17%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.07	16%	26 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	21%	26 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.04	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	13%	23 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	12%	23 Aug →
shelter	13–5	-0.05	7%	23 Aug →
boulder	12–12	-0.03	7%	23 Aug →
fachwerk	7–13	-0.00	19%	23 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	18%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.15	11%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	20%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.10	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.06	23%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	24%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.06	14%	21 Aug →
office	13–10	0.05	21%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	9%	21 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.00	12%	21 Aug →
overpass	11–2	0.00	9%	20 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	12%	20 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.09	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	10%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	12%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.10	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	28%	18 Aug →
fachwerk	12–12	0.13	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.05	22%	5 Aug →