kbZ™

kbZ™ — CS2 Stats

ZW76561197979502899[U:1:19237171]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,644Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,454Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,583Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14562 of 220567 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,644 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 14 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,583 +3,185 19 Jul10 Sept · 15 days played
20,85526,298peak 26,29819 Jul10 Sept
26,621Peak Premier in tracked matches
14Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 715 below peak (26,298)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,417 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.3%48.3%51.0%5.7% short
Shot accuracy16.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.09 short
Match win rate44.4%46.9%48.4%4.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkbZ™FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,583 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 24 Jul
48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 20 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 26 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 23 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1213In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.01
infernoA2213959%-0.00
ancientB21101148%0.01
cacheS1812667%0.02
anubisD93633%-0.00
mirageC52340%-0.02
nuke110100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

105,561Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
5,567Matches
44.4%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
13,362MVPs
2,454Hours (in match)
6,798Bombs planted
1,239Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,377
AWP16,272
Knife1,163
MAC-101,145
P250898

Lifetime map wins

24,629dust2
9,010inferno
2,134cbble
1,999nuke
1,004vertigo
900train
108lake
104shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,157Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
77.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22756%1.0617.0
Inferno2365%1.1015.3
Ancient2361%1.2116.9
Cache1567%0.9314.4
Anubis1030%0.6613.7
Overpass520%0.9013.4
Train3100%1.0914.0
Mirage3100%0.9813.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
580msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
7.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5014% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0428%23 Aug
dust29–130.0731%23 Aug
cache12–160.0733%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0117%2 Aug
inferno13–50.0418%2 Aug
dust213–60.0123%2 Aug
mirage6–130.0026%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0128%2 Aug
dust26–130.0243%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0418%30 Jul
dust213–11-0.078%30 Jul
dust213–30.0124%30 Jul
cache13–110.0422%30 Jul
ancient13–20.038%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0438%29 Jul
dust213–50.0227%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0514%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0124%29 Jul
cache16–140.0429%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0126%28 Jul
mirage11–13-0.029%28 Jul
ancient13–100.0425%27 Jul
cache13–80.0337%27 Jul
inferno13–40.0521%27 Jul
ancient13–40.0117%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0632%27 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0714%27 Jul
ancient10–130.0435%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0517%26 Jul
dust211–130.0225%26 Jul
anubis7–130.0430%26 Jul
ancient10–130.0433%26 Jul
inferno16–140.0619%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0124%26 Jul
dust213–40.0225%26 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0226%26 Jul
cache13–10-0.0529%26 Jul
mirage13–30.0216%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0421%26 Jul
dust213–110.0238%26 Jul
dust216–130.0219%26 Jul
dust24–13-0.0823%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.0124%25 Jul
cache13–50.0020%25 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0415%25 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0625%25 Jul
dust25–130.0342%24 Jul
cache13–100.0845%24 Jul
inferno13–50.0028%24 Jul
dust29–13-0.0113%24 Jul
dust213–110.0122%24 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0210%24 Jul
cache7–130.0020%24 Jul
ancient13–9-0.029%24 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0223%24 Jul
dust213–90.0318%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0221%24 Jul
cache13–20.1525%24 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0622%23 Jul
ancient13–10.0830%23 Jul
dust213–160.0122%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0515%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0732%23 Jul
dust29–130.0131%23 Jul
inferno6–130.0218%23 Jul
dust210–130.0123%23 Jul
inferno13–110.0523%22 Jul
dust213–110.0526%22 Jul
cache13–50.0920%22 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0720%22 Jul
anubis13–50.0425%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0617%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0323%22 Jul
inferno13–30.0410%21 Jul
ancient13–20.0731%21 Jul
dust216–13-0.0326%21 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0525%21 Jul
cache4–130.0533%21 Jul
dust213–20.0531%21 Jul
ancient15–150.0421%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0414%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0548%20 Jul
dust213–70.0630%20 Jul
anubis11–130.0818%20 Jul
dust213–80.0138%20 Jul
cache13–40.0015%20 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0215%20 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0319%20 Jul
inferno8–130.0317%20 Jul
anubis13–90.0120%20 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0128%20 Jul
anubis6–130.0224%20 Jul
dust214–16-0.0220%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0523%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0313%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0219%20 Jul
inferno14–160.0724%19 Jul
cache13–60.0321%19 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0030%19 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0715%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →