qRALLE ' °_o

qRALLE ' °_o — CS2 Stats

DE76561197965837672[U:1:5571944]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,101Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,101Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71452 of 221224 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,282 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,101 -1,128 7 Aug16 Sept · 26 days played
19,58422,461peak 22,4617 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,282 +0 28 Aug15 Sept · 5 observations
1,2821,282peak 1,28228 Aug15 Sept
22,461Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,282Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,282
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 69 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,360 below peak (22,461)
  • -1,226 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,899 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGqRALLE ' °_oFACEITLevel 7 · 1,282 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,101 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,282csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWWWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 461ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.8
Utility4.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time532ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy29.3%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 13 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 8 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 20 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 41% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30151550%-0.01
infernoC2291341%-0.00
ancientB178947%0.01
cacheB147750%0.01
nukeS75271%-0.01
mirageA53260%-0.01
anubisA53260%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

343Matches
52%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
41%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno956%1.0717.6
Dust2956%1.1518.8
Cache667%1.1615.8
Ancient560%0.9918.2
Mirage367%0.9113.7
Anubis333%1.1015.7
Nuke250%0.887.0
Overpass2100%1.0816.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
531msReaction time
58.1%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
11.28HE damage / grenade
2.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9208 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.1222%16 Sept
dust213–6-0.0126%16 Sept
ancient13–20.0615%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0126%15 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0632%15 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0127%15 Sept
inferno13–160.0239%14 Sept
dust26–13-0.069%14 Sept
anubis11–130.0334%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0319%13 Sept
dust213–50.0634%13 Sept
inferno13–40.0832%13 Sept
dust213–60.0332%13 Sept
nuke13–110.0637%13 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0326%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0635%13 Sept
ancient10–130.0118%13 Sept
dust213–40.1733%13 Sept
ancient8–130.0640%13 Sept
anubis13–50.1415%13 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0513%9 Sept
dust213–40.0348%9 Sept
cache9–13-0.0723%9 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0137%9 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0225%9 Sept
inferno10–130.0238%8 Sept
inferno6–130.0241%8 Sept
anubis5–13-0.1023%8 Sept
inferno13–1-0.0150%8 Sept
cache11–130.0224%8 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0533%5 Sept
cache13–100.0430%5 Sept
dust29–13-0.0131%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0328%3 Sept
cache11–130.0424%3 Sept
ancient13–50.0426%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0421%3 Sept
mirage13–50.0627%3 Sept
dust29–130.0531%1 Sept
ancient13–90.0531%30 Aug
dust24–13-0.0528%29 Aug
dust213–70.0945%29 Aug
nuke13–60.0131%29 Aug
inferno13–70.0129%29 Aug
dust213–60.0233%29 Aug
ancient16–120.0225%29 Aug
inferno16–120.0926%29 Aug
ancient10–130.0318%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.0330%29 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0913%28 Aug
dust215–15-0.0715%28 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0536%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0413%26 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0523%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.1021%23 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0630%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0217%23 Aug
cache12–16-0.0331%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0124%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0323%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0225%22 Aug
mirage4–130.0026%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0138%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0218%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0419%21 Aug
cache10–13-0.0728%20 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0524%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0030%20 Aug
dust213–100.0230%19 Aug
cache13–100.0532%19 Aug
anubis13–9-0.049%18 Aug
cache13–60.0422%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0625%18 Aug
dust213–80.0115%16 Aug
ancient13–110.0230%16 Aug
dust213–80.0737%16 Aug
ancient13–110.0735%16 Aug
inferno13–30.0716%16 Aug
cache12–16-0.0328%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0722%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0013%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0316%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0741%14 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0318%13 Aug
dust213–5-0.0718%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0526%12 Aug
dust213–6-0.0425%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.038%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0540%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0442%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0833%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0318%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0230%8 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0529%8 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0029%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0219%8 Aug
cache13–10.0631%7 Aug
dust213–110.0632%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0616%7 Aug
dust213–90.0129%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →