yAppis

yAppis — CS2 Stats

76561197978010132[U:1:17744404]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,903Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,919Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,332 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,332 → 1,332
+13Tracked matches · now 1,903
+6.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 56.7%

Rating over time

1,332Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-04-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,332
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 19 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches24——
Win rate67%——
K/D4.20——
Headshot %83%——

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate61.3%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy11.3%12.4%12.7%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.591.031.05above
Match win rate47.9%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGyAppisFACEITLevel 6 · 1,332 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,332csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning52
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 391ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.2
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time562ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 22 Apr →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · ancient, 22 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 20 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2715–1256%-0.02
dust2D184–1422%-0.02
anubisA1710–759%-0.02
infernoD154–1127%-0.03
overpassS107–370%-0.01
nukeS75–271%-0.00
mirage—43–175%0.00
cache—21–150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,610Lifetime kills
1.59K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
3,218Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
61.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
11.3%Shot accuracy
6,308MVPs
1,552Hours (in match)
6,459Bombs planted
951Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,904
AWP5,741
FAMAS2,620
MP92,236
MAC-102,153

Lifetime map wins

10,360dust2
7,361inferno
2,754nuke
855train
359vertigo
264cbble
27ar_shoots
25safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,179Matches
49%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
63.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient16153%0.8412.8
Anubis13548%0.7912.6
Inferno9749%0.8212.3
Nuke6850%0.8512.0
Dust26638%0.8212.3
Overpass6063%0.8612.1
Mirage3135%0.7411.4
Train2255%0.7511.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
559msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
16.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1266% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3242% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0613%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0211%11 Oct →
ancient3–130.000%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0118%4 Oct →
ancient11–130.0118%4 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0415%2 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0111%25 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0316%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0324%20 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.023%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0712%19 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0123%19 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0318%19 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0312%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0218%13 Sept →
ancient13–40.0218%11 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0217%11 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0112%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0414%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.019%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0217%5 Sept →
dust213–8-0.015%5 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0716%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.0028%4 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0214%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0211%31 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0517%30 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.027%30 Aug →
dust27–130.0017%23 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0311%17 Aug →
dust28–130.0021%14 Aug →
cache13–110.0225%10 Aug →
dust213–160.0520%8 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0113%8 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0417%8 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0221%7 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0815%3 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0018%29 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0014%29 Jul →
nuke13–30.034%27 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0315%22 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0233%22 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.126%22 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0719%21 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0324%21 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.028%17 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0818%17 Jul →
dust215–19-0.0413%16 Jul →
nuke25–210.0022%15 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0424%15 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0410%15 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0913%14 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.046%14 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0719%14 Jul →
ancient10–130.0118%14 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0214%14 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0418%14 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0216%13 Jul →
overpass13–10-0.039%13 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0223%12 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0511%12 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0318%12 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.029%11 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0211%11 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0418%9 Jul →
ancient13–100.0126%9 Jul →
mirage13–50.0420%9 Jul →
cache7–130.0319%8 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0416%3 Jul →
overpass13–4-0.0119%3 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0310%3 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.039%2 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.047%2 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0118%2 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0622%1 Jul →
anubis9–130.0132%1 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0215%28 Jun →
anubis13–90.0214%28 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0115%27 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.068%27 Jun →
ancient19–220.0017%1 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0118%7 May →
ancient9–13-0.0416%7 May →
dust214–16-0.075%7 May →
inferno14–16-0.0026%4 May →
overpass13–8-0.0319%4 May →
ancient8–13-0.0519%4 May →
anubis10–13-0.0028%1 May →
anubis13–60.0116%29 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0410%29 Apr →
dust210–130.0017%29 Apr →
overpass19–170.0216%27 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0115%27 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0514%26 Apr →
overpass16–120.0115%26 Apr →
overpass13–50.0223%25 Apr →
overpass13–60.0030%23 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0318%23 Apr →
nuke13–20.0724%22 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0613%21 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.