tr0w

tr0w — CS2 Stats

76561197975687073[U:1:15421345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,837Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,571Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,991Top 50% of 213,542 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56688 of 260203 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,991 +926 14 Aug – 31 Oct · 13 days played
21,06223,165peak 23,16514 Aug31 Oct
23,165Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,174 below peak (23,165)
  • +553 over 30 days · improving
  • +926 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,009 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate35.6%45.7%46.8%11.2% short
Shot accuracy14.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.051.060.08 short
Match win rate43.3%45.7%46.3%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtr0wFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,991 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning67
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.7
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.7
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms+47ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 10 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 29 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 18 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2312–1152%0.03
infernoB1910–953%0.01
ancientA1710–759%0.02
mirageB158–753%0.01
cacheC114–736%0.01
anubisD93–633%0.01
nuke—43–175%0.06
debris—10–10%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

105,054Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
5,657Matches
43.3%Match win rate
35.6%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
12,854MVPs
2,623Hours (in match)
8,601Bombs planted
1,684Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP32,306
AK-4719,719
FAMAS1,662
HE Grenade1,596
P2501,408

Lifetime map wins

16,634dust2
13,366inferno
4,905nuke
2,264train
735cbble
654vertigo
95office
19dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,306Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
78.5ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24842%1.1116.4
Inferno3661%1.1315.1
Ancient3345%1.2017.0
Anubis3145%1.3017.0
Mirage3057%1.1617.3
Cache1233%1.0214.4
Overpass786%1.0916.6
Nuke425%0.9614.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
556msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
62.2%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
4.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3499 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–3-0.0023%4 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.047%31 Oct →
cache11–13-0.029%30 Oct →
ancient4–130.0419%29 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.047%29 Oct →
dust213–50.0418%29 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0126%29 Oct →
ancient13–70.0817%28 Oct →
dust211–130.0516%28 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0415%28 Oct →
cache13–80.0514%27 Oct →
nuke13–60.0229%23 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0210%23 Oct →
mirage13–50.033%23 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.018%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0319%16 Oct →
dust212–120.0027%14 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0123%14 Oct →
ancient16–140.0113%13 Oct →
mirage16–140.0314%13 Oct →
debris8–80.0110%10 Oct →
inferno9–60.1118%10 Oct →
nuke9–40.1918%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0113%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0112%10 Oct →
dust213–70.1123%7 Oct →
cache3–13-0.090%7 Oct →
inferno13–30.025%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0318%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0017%30 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0741%30 Sept →
inferno9–130.0819%30 Sept →
dust213–110.1028%27 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0619%27 Sept →
cache9–13-0.018%25 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0112%25 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0413%25 Sept →
dust28–130.0723%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0016%19 Sept →
ancient19–160.0315%19 Sept →
dust210–130.0119%19 Sept →
inferno10–130.0826%19 Sept →
dust213–100.0120%19 Sept →
dust213–30.1120%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0518%17 Sept →
mirage5–130.0622%17 Sept →
dust25–130.0524%16 Sept →
cache15–150.0425%11 Sept →
ancient13–80.0018%11 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0027%11 Sept →
cache13–30.1040%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0533%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0518%9 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0218%9 Sept →
dust27–130.0733%9 Sept →
dust213–50.0526%8 Sept →
dust213–30.0321%8 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0326%8 Sept →
ancient13–50.0932%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0215%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0318%8 Sept →
mirage10–130.0216%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0717%4 Sept →
ancient13–110.0925%4 Sept →
dust210–130.0123%4 Sept →
dust217–19-0.0223%31 Aug →
inferno13–50.0421%31 Aug →
ancient16–140.0630%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.1126%29 Aug →
dust26–130.0124%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.0244%29 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0222%29 Aug →
anubis7–130.0329%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0430%28 Aug →
anubis13–80.0023%28 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0424%28 Aug →
inferno10–130.0112%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.059%26 Aug →
mirage9–130.0222%26 Aug →
mirage11–130.0614%25 Aug →
inferno7–130.0117%25 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0721%25 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.047%24 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0222%24 Aug →
mirage13–90.0314%24 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0221%24 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0011%22 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.018%18 Aug →
mirage13–110.0213%18 Aug →
ancient11–130.0111%18 Aug →
inferno13–60.0413%18 Aug →
dust26–130.0521%18 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0814%17 Aug →
inferno15–150.0418%15 Aug →
cache16–130.0421%15 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0518%15 Aug →
anubis11–130.0715%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0421%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0229%15 Aug →
cache13–160.0126%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.