MF_James

MF_James — CS2 Stats

US76561197962293530[U:1:2027802]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,898Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since
6,631Hours in CS73Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,276Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50889 of 251623 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,378 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,276 +1,488 11 Aug – 12 Oct · 23 days played
20,19922,589peak 22,58911 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,378 +0 31 Aug – 27 Sept · 8 observations
1,3781,378peak 1,37831 Aug27 Sept
22,589Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,378Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,378
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 153 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 313 below peak (22,589)
  • +452 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,724 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches96——
Win rate58%——
K/D1.10——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy8.4%13.0%13.3%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.471.061.07above
Match win rate47.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMF_JamesFACEITLevel 8 · 1,378 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,276 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,378csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning58
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWWLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility7.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.8
Utility7.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time555ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 10 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · ancient, 18 Sept →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 3 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3016–1453%0.02
anubisB179–853%-0.01
mirageC177–1041%-0.01
dust2B115–645%-0.02
infernoS107–370%0.00
nukeA74–357%0.01
cache—31–233%-0.02
vertigo—30–30%-0.05
rush_001—10–10%-0.06
boulder—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

225,191Lifetime kills
1.47K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
8,514Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
51.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8.4%Shot accuracy
17,099MVPs
3,993Hours (in match)
7,343Bombs planted
2,923Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4797,443
AWP14,989
Glock-1810,419
Tec-95,129
MP94,945
P2504,439

Lifetime map wins

16,853dust2
7,906inferno
5,893nuke
1,999train
1,102vertigo
552cbble
293lake
237office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

459Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10748%1.0815.7
Ancient8851%1.0915.3
Dust27254%1.0714.2
Inferno6857%1.0414.3
Nuke5358%1.3414.6
Anubis3954%1.0115.5
Overpass1567%1.3017.1
Train838%1.1115.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
556msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
10.93HE damage / grenade
18.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3038% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.019%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0519%12 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0919%12 Oct →
inferno13–40.0212%11 Oct →
rush_0016–8-0.0625%11 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0313%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.0822%8 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0111%6 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0515%6 Oct →
dust213–60.039%5 Oct →
boulder7–13-0.0012%5 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0719%5 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0420%4 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0616%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0114%4 Oct →
inferno13–20.0616%3 Oct →
inferno7–130.0314%3 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0128%3 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0715%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0520%2 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0213%30 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0110%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0619%24 Sept →
cache13–100.035%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0416%21 Sept →
ancient13–80.0214%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0220%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0910%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0022%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.0916%19 Sept →
inferno9–130.0125%19 Sept →
ancient13–50.0529%18 Sept →
dust213–50.012%18 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0213%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.0214%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0211%18 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0516%18 Sept →
mirage5–130.0114%16 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0513%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0621%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0910%14 Sept →
anubis10–130.0315%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0210%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0223%14 Sept →
dust213–30.0013%13 Sept →
anubis13–40.1121%10 Sept →
inferno16–12-0.0116%9 Sept →
ancient12–120.0510%6 Sept →
nuke5–130.0322%6 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0116%6 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.027%6 Sept →
ancient13–80.1014%6 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0220%6 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0321%6 Sept →
inferno13–40.0115%5 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0120%5 Sept →
ancient13–80.1013%5 Sept →
dust213–100.0015%4 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0716%4 Sept →
ancient13–40.0314%4 Sept →
anubis13–60.0213%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.0110%2 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0214%2 Sept →
mirage19–150.0613%24 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0314%23 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0117%23 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0415%23 Aug →
ancient8–130.0318%23 Aug →
ancient13–100.029%23 Aug →
vertigo5–13-0.094%18 Aug →
ancient13–50.0115%18 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0818%17 Aug →
ancient6–130.0015%17 Aug →
ancient9–130.0814%17 Aug →
nuke13–90.0419%16 Aug →
dust28–130.0313%16 Aug →
ancient13–40.0913%16 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0014%16 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0324%15 Aug →
ancient13–80.0623%13 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0116%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0114%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0619%13 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0119%13 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0220%12 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0922%11 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0112%11 Aug →
ancient13–90.036%11 Aug →
anubis13–90.0616%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0017%8 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0418%8 Aug →
inferno13–70.0313%8 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0016%8 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0517%8 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0515%8 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0314%8 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0122%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0412%8 Aug →
cache16–19-0.036%8 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.106%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.