Shane216

Shane216 — CS2 Stats

US76561198082600610[U:1:122334882]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,711Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,134 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,134 → 1,134
+1Tracked matches · now 1,711
0.0ppWin rate · 46.4% → 46.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 23 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,962 +1,165 23 Jun27 Jun · 3 days played
20,79721,962peak 21,96223 Jun27 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,134 +0 31 Aug24 Sept · 5 observations
1,1341,134peak 1,13431 Aug24 Sept
22,474Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,134Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,134
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShane216FACEITLevel 7 · 1,134 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,134csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time537ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 8 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 28 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 18 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 4 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 79% over 14dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2315865%0.00
dust2D1551033%0.00
mirageC146843%0.02
anubisS1411379%0.03
nukeC135838%-0.00
infernoB105550%0.01
overpassC52340%0.02
cache31233%-0.01
vertigo32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

552Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9154%1.1215.6
Nuke7449%1.1216.3
Inferno6949%1.0915.9
Mirage6557%1.2416.3
Dust26542%1.1315.9
Vertigo5351%1.1316.1
Anubis4854%1.1415.4
Overpass3746%1.2216.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
540msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.63HE damage / grenade
7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4453% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0516%6 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0324%6 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0219%6 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0216%3 Sept
anubis13–60.0523%3 Sept
cache13–80.1131%1 Sept
overpass13–6-0.0010%1 Sept
anubis13–90.0320%1 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0517%31 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0117%31 Aug
dust24–13-0.0617%28 Aug
dust215–15-0.0516%27 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0314%26 Aug
overpass12–120.0921%25 Aug
nuke8–130.0124%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0514%25 Aug
dust213–70.0225%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.029%24 Aug
mirage8–130.0217%24 Aug
mirage19–150.0215%24 Aug
inferno4–13-0.066%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.055%18 Aug
dust29–130.0527%18 Aug
vertigo5–130.0720%18 Aug
ancient13–50.1016%18 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0518%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0214%13 Aug
anubis13–100.0215%12 Aug
anubis8–130.0312%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0115%11 Aug
ancient13–90.0011%11 Aug
nuke10–130.0223%9 Aug
anubis13–110.1714%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0019%8 Aug
inferno13–50.1211%8 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0214%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0126%7 Aug
nuke8–130.0026%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0323%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0113%7 Aug
ancient11–13-0.034%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0314%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0510%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0213%5 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0214%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0321%5 Aug
anubis8–130.0017%5 Aug
ancient13–110.019%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0421%4 Aug
anubis13–10.0918%4 Aug
ancient8–5-0.0929%1 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0429%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0615%30 Jul
inferno7–130.0719%30 Jul
ancient13–30.1316%30 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0219%30 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0211%30 Jul
dust23–13-0.0514%30 Jul
dust213–110.0515%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0227%28 Jul
ancient13–90.0836%28 Jul
mirage13–10.0526%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0619%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0817%28 Jul
inferno13–30.0216%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0411%27 Jul
ancient13–60.0113%27 Jul
dust213–50.1223%27 Jul
nuke11–130.0026%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0710%26 Jul
anubis13–40.0211%26 Jul
cache9–13-0.0812%22 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0310%22 Jul
dust218–22-0.0215%29 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0610%29 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0410%28 Jun
nuke13–90.0622%28 Jun
dust210–130.0324%28 Jun
ancient14–160.0013%28 Jun
ancient11–130.019%28 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0524%27 Jun
mirage2–130.0726%27 Jun
ancient13–20.0313%27 Jun
mirage9–130.0024%27 Jun
nuke13–100.0717%27 Jun
dust24–130.0313%27 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0111%27 Jun
inferno13–30.1021%27 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0111%27 Jun
anubis13–60.0917%27 Jun
dust213–70.0216%26 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0321%26 Jun
inferno13–80.0521%26 Jun
dust213–160.0518%26 Jun
overpass13–80.0718%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.058%25 Jun
ancient13–100.0415%24 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0517%24 Jun
mirage13–40.0824%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0214%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →