Kronos@NextFrag.gg — CS2 Stats

CH76561197960267451[U:1:1723]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,171Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,715Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#22080 of 22944 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,424 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,424Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,424
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 107 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	63.3%	44.2%	44.9%	above
Shot accuracy	14.2%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.51	1.04	1.04	above
Match win rate	43.4%	45.3%	45.3%	1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning39

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression5.4

Utility4.2

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning3.9

Utility4.2

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time617ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms

Headshot accuracy14.2%−3.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–10

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 29% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	46	27–19	59%	-0.02
dust2	D	17	5–12	29%	-0.03
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
inferno	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
mirage	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.03
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

196,078Lifetime kills

1.51K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players

5,851Matches

43.4%Match win rate

63.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players

14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

14,891MVPs

3,633Hours (in match)

5,729Bombs planted

1,074Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47106,453

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,870

AWP12,906

P2000 / USP-S7,919

AUG5,401

Galil AR5,322

FAMAS4,943

Five-SeveN4,709

Desert Eagle4,115

Glock-184,045

Lifetime map wins

13,824inferno

8,779dust2

5,475nuke

2,028train

1,159vertigo

366office

177cbble

61lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

381Matches

51%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

79.7ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	63	46%	1.00	15.2
Mirage	52	48%	0.84	13.5
Inferno	32	50%	1.14	18.4
Ancient	31	65%	1.14	15.8
Anubis	18	28%	0.73	12.2
Nuke	13	69%	1.00	15.0
Overpass	9	33%	1.04	18.2
Cache	4	75%	0.91	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

79.1%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

623msReaction time

30.0%T opening success

47.8%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

7.41HE damage / grenade

4.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9116% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4575 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.0145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	4–13	-0.06	8%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	6%	15 Aug →
anubis	6–2	-0.05	11%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	18%	14 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	17%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	19%	6 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	13%	6 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.08	13%	6 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	21%	31 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.01	30%	31 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	10%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	14%	31 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	20%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	10%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	17–19	-0.04	9%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	18%	17 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	26%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.06	19%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.08	19%	8 Jul →
stronghold	13–4	0.09	11%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	20%	7 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	8%	7 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	17%	3 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.09	11%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	11%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	9%	3 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	13%	3 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	6%	30 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.03	12%	29 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.01	10%	29 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.02	20%	27 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.05	25%	27 Jun →
cache	13–3	-0.06	12%	27 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	14%	27 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	12%	27 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.04	14%	27 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	13%	24 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.03	17%	23 Jun →
train	12–12	0.00	8%	23 Jun →
inferno	14–16	0.01	8%	9 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	15%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.12	19%	7 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.00	31%	5 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	4%	5 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.00	12%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.04	17%	5 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	4%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.01	13%	2 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.01	16%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.07	17%	2 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.03	14%	2 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.06	11%	1 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	14%	1 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.05	12%	1 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.06	4%	29 May →
cache	13–10	-0.04	9%	29 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	7%	29 May →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	14%	29 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.09	24%	29 May →
cache	13–11	-0.03	14%	29 May →
ancient	6–13	0.06	25%	22 May →
cache	13–6	0.03	11%	22 May →
nuke	13–5	0.02	14%	22 May →
cache	13–3	0.02	15%	22 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	21%	22 May →
cache	13–3	0.10	15%	22 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	30%	21 May →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	20%	21 May →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	21%	21 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	10%	20 May →
cache	10–13	-0.00	17%	20 May →
inferno	13–6	0.04	11%	20 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	12%	20 May →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	10%	20 May →
dust2	13–8	0.04	20%	19 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	12%	18 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	19%	18 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	12%	18 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	15%	17 May →
dust2	11–13	0.06	22%	17 May →
cache	13–11	-0.05	15%	10 May →
cache	11–13	0.00	20%	10 May →
mirage	9–13	0.03	25%	9 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	9 May →
cache	13–7	-0.02	6%	9 May →
cache	13–11	-0.03	22%	8 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	19%	8 May →
cache	6–2	-0.02	33%	8 May →
cache	13–7	-0.06	21%	8 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.07	17%	6 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	12%	6 May →
cache	13–4	-0.04	23%	5 May →
cache	13–5	-0.02	9%	5 May →
cache	13–8	0.00	17%	3 May →
cache	13–2	-0.01	13%	3 May →
cache	9–2	0.07	26%	3 May →
cache	13–11	-0.08	9%	3 May →