HooXiCHAD

HooXiCHAD — CS2 Stats

DK76561199883532960[U:1:1923267232]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

827Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,573Hours in CS55Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,522Light Blue band · top ~62% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 903 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,522 +2,420 18 Jun – 22 Sept · 7 days played
6,1028,642peak 8,64218 Jun22 Sept
9,642Peak Premier in tracked matches
903Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 903
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 148 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 120 below peak (8,642)
  • +1,499 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,478 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate60.3%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.031.050.06 short
Match win rate36.9%45.2%45.7%8.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHooXiCHADFACEITLevel 6 · 903 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER8,522 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO903csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning71
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.2
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning7.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time618ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 29 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 28 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 13 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2915–1452%0.01
ancientA148–657%0.01
dust2A149–564%0.03
cacheB126–650%0.02
nukeD93–633%-0.00
debrisA74–357%0.07
infernoD51–420%0.00
vertigoA53–260%-0.00
anubis—32–167%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,458Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,451Matches
36.9%Match win rate
60.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,218MVPs
1,948Hours (in match)
1,561Bombs planted
626Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,936
AWP7,608
Knife555

Lifetime map wins

1,964dust2
1,528inferno
1,056nuke
260vertigo
142train
27ar_shoots
21italy
12ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

511Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15653%1.2015.8
Ancient9354%1.1116.4
Dust26338%1.0116.2
Inferno5934%1.0115.5
Cache5459%1.0916.9
Anubis3936%1.0017.5
Nuke3644%1.0816.2
Overpass650%1.0416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
618msReaction time
59.5%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
6.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0436%28 Oct →
mirage13–40.0718%28 Oct →
mirage8–130.0619%27 Oct →
cache13–90.0415%21 Oct →
cache8–130.0319%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.0026%20 Oct →
cache13–20.0818%20 Oct →
overpass6–9-0.0215%16 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0331%10 Oct →
cache8–100.0619%7 Oct →
mirage13–40.0420%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0418%2 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0315%2 Oct →
mirage17–19-0.0015%1 Oct →
cache13–100.0028%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.0212%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0120%30 Sept →
debris9–60.2629%29 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0110%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0410%23 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0317%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.0016%22 Sept →
mirage10–130.048%22 Sept →
dust213–90.0233%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0415%20 Sept →
cache13–100.0016%20 Sept →
dust213–30.0522%20 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0311%20 Sept →
mirage13–10.0113%19 Sept →
ancient11–130.0511%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0213%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.0819%17 Sept →
mirage1–120.0010%17 Sept →
dust211–130.0320%17 Sept →
ancient13–110.0312%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0419%17 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0415%15 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0320%15 Sept →
mirage13–20.0513%15 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0523%13 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0321%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0317%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.099%13 Sept →
debris8–80.0530%13 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.014%12 Sept →
debris6–90.0618%11 Sept →
dust219–150.0228%8 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0129%8 Sept →
dust213–60.057%8 Sept →
dust29–130.0621%4 Sept →
mirage13–20.0715%2 Sept →
inferno13–160.0621%20 Aug →
debris9–3-0.0112%18 Aug →
debris9–70.0021%18 Aug →
debris7–9-0.0622%17 Aug →
nuke9–10.0428%16 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0211%14 Aug →
dust213–00.0732%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.0121%13 Aug →
debris9–70.1917%2 Aug →
dust213–60.0527%30 Jul →
nuke12–140.0126%29 Jul →
cache6–130.0219%29 Jul →
mirage15–150.0210%29 Jul →
anubis6–130.0321%29 Jul →
mirage3–130.0013%29 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.0513%29 Jul →
nuke9–50.0323%29 Jul →
vertigo9–70.0515%29 Jul →
vertigo2–9-0.105%29 Jul →
vertigo9–130.0122%29 Jul →
mirage7–130.0722%28 Jul →
ancient13–70.0722%26 Jul →
vertigo13–70.0333%26 Jul →
mirage9–130.0117%25 Jul →
anubis13–10.0517%25 Jul →
mirage13–60.0530%25 Jul →
dust213–20.0436%25 Jul →
dust213–100.0526%22 Jul →
vertigo13–110.0021%21 Jul →
cache9–130.0221%20 Jul →
ancient13–90.0828%19 Jul →
inferno13–40.0717%19 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0414%15 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0221%15 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0623%13 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0921%5 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0716%3 Jul →
mirage8–130.026%30 Jun →
cache13–00.000%30 Jun →
dust25–130.0621%28 Jun →
ancient1–80.0317%28 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0223%28 Jun →
nuke8–130.0527%26 Jun →
mirage6–130.0419%26 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0326%24 Jun →
overpass13–60.0417%19 Jun →
dust213–20.009%19 Jun →
mirage13–1-0.0015%18 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0311%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.