THUNDER

THUNDER — CS2 Stats

SY76561199882897366[U:1:1922631638]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,734Tracked matches58%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,063Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,462Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10594 of 261607 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,016 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+127Premier CS Rating · 26,335 → 26,462

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,462 +2,641 30 Aug – 14 Nov · 22 days played
23,82127,093peak 27,09330 Aug14 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,016 +0 30 Aug – 24 Sept · 9 observations
1,0161,016peak 1,01630 Aug24 Sept
27,298Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,016Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
15Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,016
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 631 below peak (27,093)
  • +2,641 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,538 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate53.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.12 short
Match win rate53.1%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTHUNDERFACEITLevel 7 · 1,016 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,462 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,016csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateTWLWLWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.4pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 7–9–4 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 10 Nov →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 31 Oct →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · dust2, 1 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 52% over 21ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2210–1245%-0.02
anubisB2111–1052%0.02
cacheB189–950%-0.02
mirageB157–847%0.00
ancientC114–736%0.02
infernoC104–640%0.02
nuke—32–167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,131Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,970Matches
53.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
53.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,584MVPs
1,492Hours (in match)
2,500Bombs planted
566Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,035dust2
2,948inferno
1,788nuke
781train
192vertigo
31italy
19office
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

663Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
78.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19452%0.9614.6
Dust218656%0.9815.1
Anubis8756%1.0715.6
Ancient7944%0.9114.4
Inferno4943%0.9214.9
Cache3057%1.0114.3
Nuke2726%0.8213.4
Overpass1050%0.8912.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
579msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
61.1%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
9.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0226%14 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0024%14 Nov →
ancient11–130.0333%14 Nov →
mirage13–100.0324%14 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0228%14 Nov →
cache13–20.0121%14 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0429%13 Nov →
ancient16–12-0.0320%12 Nov →
ancient15–150.0720%12 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0434%12 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0129%12 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0412%12 Nov →
cache15–15-0.0327%12 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0130%12 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0113%11 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.0919%11 Nov →
dust213–60.0420%11 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0115%11 Nov →
cache5–13-0.099%10 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0218%10 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0628%10 Nov →
ancient13–110.0219%10 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0317%10 Nov →
inferno9–40.3439%10 Nov →
mirage13–60.0117%9 Nov →
nuke13–100.0918%9 Nov →
dust213–90.0225%9 Nov →
cache9–130.0216%7 Nov →
anubis13–70.0826%7 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0235%7 Nov →
anubis13–100.0520%7 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0224%7 Nov →
dust23–6-0.0242%7 Nov →
inferno6–130.0322%7 Nov →
cache13–90.0123%6 Nov →
cache13–2-0.0240%6 Nov →
dust28–130.0233%6 Nov →
mirage13–160.0120%6 Nov →
inferno5–9-0.0217%6 Nov →
inferno0–9-0.1833%6 Nov →
mirage12–120.0122%6 Nov →
inferno9–5-0.0131%6 Nov →
cache5–13-0.0725%5 Nov →
inferno13–100.0230%5 Nov →
mirage13–00.0323%5 Nov →
cache13–30.0229%5 Nov →
anubis7–130.1029%5 Nov →
mirage13–90.0722%5 Nov →
inferno10–130.0126%5 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0328%5 Nov →
anubis13–30.0519%5 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0717%3 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0926%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0720%1 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0027%1 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0219%1 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0321%1 Nov →
anubis13–110.0113%1 Nov →
dust27–130.0115%1 Nov →
mirage13–80.0030%1 Nov →
dust20–7-0.100%1 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0124%31 Oct →
anubis13–160.1027%31 Oct →
inferno13–100.0328%31 Oct →
ancient13–100.0323%31 Oct →
ancient13–110.0430%31 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0224%31 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0233%31 Oct →
anubis11–130.0633%31 Oct →
dust213–30.0128%31 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0246%31 Oct →
mirage14–160.0625%31 Oct →
dust25–130.0134%30 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0224%30 Oct →
anubis13–100.1433%30 Oct →
cache13–110.0818%30 Oct →
dust27–130.0129%30 Oct →
dust22–9-0.0533%30 Oct →
anubis13–50.1127%30 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0126%30 Oct →
nuke11–130.0230%30 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0223%30 Oct →
anubis10–130.0220%30 Oct →
ancient15–150.0126%30 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0321%30 Oct →
ancient10–130.0131%29 Oct →
dust213–60.0141%29 Oct →
dust213–60.0733%29 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0125%29 Oct →
anubis7–130.0538%29 Oct →
cache4–11-0.0121%29 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0029%29 Oct →
ancient11–130.0438%29 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0232%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.0114%28 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0540%28 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0118%28 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0618%28 Oct →
dust22–7-0.0640%28 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0810%28 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.