Salman Khan

Salman Khan — CS2 Stats

AE76561199863934125[U:1:1903668397]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

497Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
655Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating3,647Grey band · top ~84.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 9 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,647 +396 18 Sept18 Sept · 29 days played
1,9088,180peak 8,18018 Sept18 Sept
8,180Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2025-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,533 below peak (8,180)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1,353 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.7%42.7%43.8%1.1% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.020.16 short
Match win rate47.9%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSalman KhanFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER3,647 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning43
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −9.9pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 724ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility4.1
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 689ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.3
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time700ms+153ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 700ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 4–13 · dust2, 24 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · dust2, 9 Mar
352msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · overpass, 29 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.01
infernoD1541127%-0.06
nukeA149564%0.01
dust2B137654%-0.00
cacheC83538%-0.04
ancientA85363%0.00
office42250%0.04
train32167%-0.04
overpass31233%0.07
anubis21150%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,784Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
845Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
42.7%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,793MVPs
308Hours (in match)
661Bombs planted
349Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,337dust2
879nuke
676inferno
482train
77vertigo
69office
7italy
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

379Matches
48%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
65.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14850%0.8012.9
Dust25737%0.7011.9
Ancient5556%0.9415.2
Nuke4252%0.8813.7
Overpass2854%0.7813.0
Train2446%0.9915.5
Inferno1338%0.9814.5
Anubis1233%0.6610.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
689msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
14.9%Flash assists
5.22HE damage / grenade
7.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4632 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1702% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0124%18 Sept
nuke13–110.1511%10 Sept
mirage3–13-0.045%10 Sept
inferno13–00.0716%10 Sept
office13–7-0.0515%3 Sept
mirage13–8-0.016%3 Sept
dust214–16-0.130%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.019%22 Jul
inferno1–9-0.1913%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.035%18 Jul
office13–70.1122%8 Jul
office11–13-0.0422%8 Jul
cache13–3-0.0620%26 Jun
ancient13–11-0.048%26 Jun
inferno1–13-0.1533%26 Jun
vertigo1–13-0.0518%4 Jun
cache13–60.0220%27 May
cache9–130.0423%21 May
nuke16–130.1221%21 May
office12–120.1516%19 May
cache6–13-0.0419%6 May
cache13–8-0.139%6 May
cache5–13-0.078%6 May
cache5–13-0.0724%6 May
mirage15–150.0124%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0219%29 Apr
vertigo13–9-0.0714%14 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0420%1 Apr
inferno10–130.0729%31 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0823%13 Mar
nuke3–130.0028%13 Mar
mirage8–00.0617%12 Mar
ancient3–130.0129%11 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0522%10 Mar
dust20–4-0.09100%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0022%9 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0410%8 Mar
nuke13–100.046%7 Mar
dust213–11-0.019%7 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0617%6 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0131%6 Mar
dust29–13-0.0310%3 Mar
nuke5–9-0.1711%2 Mar
inferno6–9-0.187%2 Mar
inferno1–7-0.2220%28 Feb
dust215–15-0.0213%27 Feb
ancient2–13-0.048%26 Feb
train13–10-0.0710%26 Feb
nuke13–10-0.069%26 Feb
mirage3–110.0811%25 Feb
train4–13-0.0533%25 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0321%24 Feb
dust213–30.086%24 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0312%23 Feb
mirage1–13-0.053%17 Feb
mirage3–13-0.025%27 Oct
nuke8–130.0119%24 Oct
inferno8–130.0315%24 Oct
anubis10–13-0.0520%16 Oct
mirage13–8-0.0322%13 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0416%10 Oct
dust24–13-0.0440%2 Oct
ancient11–0-0.0056%30 Sept
dust213–100.0227%30 Sept
ancient13–30.0523%30 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0226%30 Sept
overpass1–7-0.010%29 Sept
mirage12–160.0119%29 Sept
mirage13–10.0333%28 Sept
dust213–90.0710%28 Sept
overpass13–60.1214%28 Sept
mirage13–00.1013%28 Sept
mirage13–110.0817%28 Sept
overpass11–130.1025%26 Sept
mirage13–40.1117%26 Sept
nuke13–40.0319%26 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0122%25 Sept
dust213–10.048%24 Sept
mirage13–110.0326%24 Sept
ancient13–80.0812%24 Sept
mirage16–120.0327%24 Sept
dust24–130.1518%24 Sept
nuke13–110.0114%21 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0020%21 Sept
dust213–50.0314%21 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0135%20 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0712%20 Sept
inferno8–130.0123%20 Sept
train16–130.0114%20 Sept
nuke13–60.0123%19 Sept
dust213–8-0.1011%19 Sept
nuke13–7-0.077%19 Sept
ancient13–20.0017%18 Sept
mirage13–160.058%18 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0115%18 Sept
mirage13–10.037%18 Sept
nuke6–130.0223%18 Sept
inferno12–120.0017%10 Sept
nuke4–130.0118%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.066%9 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →