panda

panda — CS2 Stats

76561198419884028[U:1:459618300]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,646Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,608Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,235 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,235 → 2,235
+2Tracked matches · now 2,646
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 31 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,392 -1,961 31 Dec2 Jul · 28 days played
14,39217,647peak 17,64731 Dec2 Jul
17,647Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,235Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2025-12-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,235
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 265 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate57.3%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy17.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.071.09above
Match win rate58.5%46.9%48.4%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpandaFACEITLevel 9 · 2,235 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,235csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47512Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −107ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility1.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility1.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time645ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 29.3% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 24 Apr
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · overpass, 6 Apr
422msFastest reaction time · 8–0 · mirage, 12 Mar
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L7Current streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 9cacheWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34151944%0.03
dust2B1991047%0.04
ancientD113827%0.02
infernoA116555%0.02
anubisS990100%0.03
nukeC73443%0.03
cacheD5050%0.03
overpass31233%0.01
vertigo110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

369,679Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
10,796Matches
58.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
57.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
51,531MVPs
6,008Hours (in match)
16,660Bombs planted
5,489Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47142,456
AWP39,078
Glock-1813,266
SG 5537,462
SSG 086,348
FAMAS3,898
Knife3,715

Lifetime map wins

16,649inferno
13,580train
12,536dust2
8,748nuke
2,722cbble
2,521vertigo
229lake
190office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,703Matches
50%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
100.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36751%1.4122.7
Dust215147%1.3520.8
Anubis14852%1.4421.6
Ancient13647%1.2821.5
Nuke10549%1.4022.7
Inferno5334%1.3321.1
Train4734%1.2821.7
Overpass3647%1.3022.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.1%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
634msReaction time
41.8%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.22Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.40HE damage / grenade
2.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2224 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0421%11 Sept
dust28–130.0334%6 Sept
mirage13–160.0122%31 Aug
mirage5–130.0317%18 Jul
mirage11–130.0138%18 Jul
dust25–130.0633%11 Jul
mirage2–60.0322%11 Jul
anubis13–80.0427%11 Jul
mirage3–130.0050%2 Jul
anubis16–140.0822%1 Jul
nuke6–130.0659%1 Jul
nuke13–70.0330%1 Jul
ancient13–80.0941%27 Jun
anubis13–60.0136%26 Jun
ancient11–130.0627%10 Jun
anubis13–110.0528%10 Jun
ancient9–130.0037%2 Jun
ancient16–140.0029%26 May
dust210–130.0516%18 May
mirage13–4-0.0622%14 May
mirage13–40.0623%13 May
mirage13–90.0423%13 May
mirage13–160.0927%12 May
cache5–130.0233%6 May
cache6–13-0.0424%6 May
anubis13–11-0.0232%5 May
mirage13–10.1234%5 May
nuke7–130.0244%4 May
inferno13–40.0730%3 May
ancient13–20.0628%3 May
mirage13–30.0024%3 May
mirage13–40.0635%1 May
cache5–130.1126%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0229%29 Apr
cache7–130.0935%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0133%28 Apr
inferno13–160.0122%28 Apr
nuke19–170.0727%26 Apr
dust25–13-0.0433%25 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0341%24 Apr
dust210–130.0329%24 Apr
dust213–00.2939%24 Apr
dust213–7-0.0126%20 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0525%20 Apr
mirage10–130.0431%17 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0316%13 Apr
mirage13–30.0533%13 Apr
mirage13–50.1522%11 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0529%11 Apr
mirage10–130.0340%9 Apr
overpass0–2-0.0367%6 Apr
mirage1–130.0738%4 Apr
inferno13–110.1340%4 Apr
mirage13–100.0725%4 Apr
anubis13–90.0121%16 Mar
anubis13–110.0424%16 Mar
dust213–70.1231%15 Mar
ancient11–130.0227%13 Mar
mirage15–150.0740%13 Mar
mirage8–00.040%12 Mar
vertigo9–40.1623%12 Mar
inferno15–150.0148%11 Mar
overpass3–130.0427%11 Mar
ancient3–130.0327%11 Mar
inferno13–110.0446%10 Mar
dust20–4-0.0667%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0033%6 Mar
inferno3–130.0438%6 Mar
mirage10–130.0130%6 Mar
nuke13–90.0630%5 Mar
dust23–6-0.0720%5 Mar
dust213–5-0.0235%5 Mar
nuke2–130.0725%28 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0219%25 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0337%25 Feb
mirage12–160.0016%23 Feb
dust23–12-0.0121%23 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0227%22 Feb
anubis13–70.0824%22 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0130%22 Feb
dust26–13-0.0338%20 Feb
dust216–140.1145%20 Feb
anubis13–30.0132%20 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0221%18 Feb
mirage8–130.0514%18 Feb
inferno13–40.0252%18 Feb
mirage5–130.0124%14 Feb
dust213–50.0742%14 Feb
ancient4–130.0220%13 Feb
dust24–13-0.0642%31 Jan
inferno1–13-0.0521%30 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0227%29 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0128%18 Jan
dust213–3-0.0139%18 Jan
overpass13–70.0234%14 Jan
dust213–30.1026%13 Jan
mirage13–100.0724%13 Jan
dust213–110.1527%9 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0630%3 Jan
mirage13–100.0130%31 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →