vacjzx

vacjzx — CS2 Stats

VN76561199850886410[U:1:1890620682]Steam profile ↗

760Tracked matches28%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,128Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,916Top 50% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97559 of 253530 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,916 -1,943 4 Aug – 18 Oct · 29 days played
18,91623,260peak 23,2604 Aug18 Oct
23,586Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-08-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,344 below peak (23,260)
  • -4,103 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,084 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.061.070.19 short
Match win rate46.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvacjzxFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,916 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning57
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −12.9pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility2.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.7
Utility2.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time530ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 18 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 7 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 22 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C218–1338%0.01
infernoC187–1139%-0.00
anubisC177–1041%0.00
mirageA138–562%-0.01
ancientA127–558%0.03
cacheB84–450%0.01
nukeS64–267%-0.02
vertigo—21–150%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.02
train—10–10%0.08
poseidon—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,976Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,384Matches
46.2%Match win rate
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,466MVPs
596Hours (in match)
1,417Bombs planted
351Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,417
AWP2,157
Knife608
MP9601

Lifetime map wins

3,555dust2
2,648inferno
460nuke
52train
32vertigo
4office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

575Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214051%1.1016.5
Mirage13153%1.1316.5
Inferno9352%1.0216.9
Anubis9248%1.2016.9
Ancient8148%1.1116.4
Nuke1553%1.0014.3
Cache1560%1.4520.0
Overpass812%1.1118.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
532msReaction time
46.6%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
6.83HE damage / grenade
2.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2849 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0227%18 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0320%18 Oct →
ancient13–70.1820%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.0223%14 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0818%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0822%14 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0611%13 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0115%12 Oct →
ancient16–130.0916%12 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0817%12 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0321%12 Oct →
dust22–130.0056%7 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1144%7 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0532%6 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0333%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.0618%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0123%6 Oct →
anubis13–90.0926%4 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0638%2 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0526%1 Oct →
mirage13–110.0435%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0417%30 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0330%30 Sept →
dust24–130.0531%30 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0430%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0426%29 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0450%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0235%29 Sept →
dust23–130.0322%28 Sept →
anubis13–70.0420%26 Sept →
inferno11–130.0023%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0315%25 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0226%25 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0827%25 Sept →
anubis13–50.1022%25 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0524%23 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0418%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0934%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0316%23 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0031%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.1226%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0227%22 Sept →
dust28–3-0.0121%21 Sept →
cache5–130.0234%21 Sept →
anubis10–130.0718%21 Sept →
mirage13–70.0831%20 Sept →
dust213–60.0233%17 Sept →
inferno13–80.0638%16 Sept →
dust213–40.0525%16 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0516%16 Sept →
dust213–10.1326%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.0219%16 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0029%11 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0121%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.0826%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0515%9 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0616%9 Sept →
inferno13–70.0024%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0122%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0412%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0524%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0713%2 Sept →
overpass13–30.0228%2 Sept →
train5–130.0828%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0421%2 Sept →
dust28–130.0031%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0123%1 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0418%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0033%31 Aug →
dust210–130.0618%29 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0225%26 Aug →
inferno8–80.1813%26 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0311%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0519%26 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.1022%22 Aug →
mirage16–130.0213%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0131%19 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0124%19 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0935%19 Aug →
dust21–13-0.1120%19 Aug →
anubis13–110.0523%18 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0233%16 Aug →
nuke22–20-0.0621%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0325%13 Aug →
dust29–130.068%12 Aug →
cache13–90.036%11 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0529%11 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1219%11 Aug →
ancient15–150.0325%11 Aug →
ancient13–70.0415%8 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0223%8 Aug →
ancient13–110.0622%8 Aug →
nuke13–110.0317%6 Aug →
anubis13–50.0419%6 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0217%5 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0424%5 Aug →
vertigo9–2-0.0226%5 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.028%4 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0219%4 Aug →
cache13–80.0722%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.