noaim with steroids

noaim with steroids — CS2 Stats

76561199816952874[U:1:1856687146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

221Tracked matches64%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAll-Rounder
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 221 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,719 -1,824 12 Feb – 24 Jun · 16 days played
13,43718,883peak 18,88312 Feb24 Jun
18,883Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-01-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning57
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.5
Utility5.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels6.3

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time615ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 7 May →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–8 · nuke, 24 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · nuke, 1 Feb →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 28 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2111–1052%0.01
infernoA2011–955%0.01
ancientA1710–759%0.01
dust2C145–936%0.02
anubisD102–820%0.01
overpassS75–271%-0.02
mirageC73–443%0.01
cache—20–20%-0.01
alpine—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
614msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
64.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
6.96HE damage / grenade
10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6404% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9412% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–13-0.048%17 Aug →
anubis13–30.0427%11 Aug →
dust213–70.0213%11 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0711%11 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.009%24 Jun →
dust213–9-0.028%24 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0314%24 Jun →
ancient13–70.0412%24 Jun →
dust29–130.0312%23 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.009%23 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0522%23 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0414%3 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0012%3 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0114%3 Jun →
overpass13–5-0.0024%3 Jun →
anubis8–130.0217%3 Jun →
ancient13–2-0.0410%28 May →
nuke13–60.017%28 May →
mirage13–70.0210%28 May →
overpass13–9-0.044%28 May →
dust210–130.0511%28 May →
inferno13–5-0.0416%28 May →
nuke13–60.0615%14 May →
nuke13–80.1214%14 May →
inferno13–70.0614%14 May →
nuke16–120.0315%14 May →
inferno15–150.0610%14 May →
nuke5–130.0121%14 May →
inferno13–100.048%13 May →
nuke14–160.008%13 May →
anubis9–130.066%13 May →
cache8–130.0212%13 May →
mirage13–6-0.0310%13 May →
ancient13–80.0511%13 May →
inferno13–80.0413%13 May →
dust213–80.1216%13 May →
dust213–110.0414%7 May →
inferno3–30.0225%7 May →
nuke13–90.038%7 May →
nuke8–130.0119%7 May →
inferno13–60.1312%7 May →
inferno13–80.0014%6 May →
ancient13–2-0.0321%6 May →
mirage11–130.0415%6 May →
inferno13–40.0615%22 Apr →
dust215–150.0512%22 Apr →
ancient6–130.0413%19 Apr →
nuke13–12-0.0112%19 Apr →
inferno11–130.0111%19 Apr →
nuke9–130.0427%19 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0213%19 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0723%19 Apr →
dust25–130.019%19 Apr →
nuke8–130.0613%19 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0011%19 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0310%19 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0013%19 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0313%19 Apr →
inferno13–5-0.0121%15 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0713%15 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0232%15 Apr →
dust24–130.0332%15 Apr →
mirage16–130.0012%15 Apr →
anubis10–130.0018%15 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0212%15 Apr →
nuke3–8-0.1067%24 Mar →
ancient13–40.0615%24 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0621%24 Mar →
mirage8–130.0610%15 Mar →
dust213–30.1216%14 Mar →
inferno13–60.0310%11 Mar →
nuke13–160.0525%11 Mar →
inferno0–8-0.1120%2 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.039%2 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0412%2 Mar →
alpine13–100.0616%13 Feb →
inferno16–130.0420%13 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0218%13 Feb →
inferno15–150.0019%13 Feb →
overpass13–5-0.0120%13 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0015%13 Feb →
ancient6–130.0113%13 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0413%12 Feb →
nuke13–100.039%12 Feb →
ancient13–70.0414%12 Feb →
inferno13–16-0.0116%12 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0414%12 Feb →
overpass13–3-0.014%12 Feb →
vertigo10–130.0117%12 Feb →
anubis7–130.0212%10 Feb →
nuke13–60.0117%10 Feb →
overpass13–70.019%5 Feb →
ancient13–60.0617%5 Feb →
anubis12–160.0518%1 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0017%1 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0417%1 Feb →
mirage5–130.0212%1 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0016%1 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0211%1 Feb →
ancient16–130.038%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.