Paavomies

Paavomies — CS2 Stats

76561198254307891[U:1:294042163]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

477Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPaavomiesFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.7
Aggression3.7
Utility7.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time608ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+5.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — overpass 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB23121152%0.03
nukeA1710759%0.04
infernoB158753%0.03
mirageA149564%0.05
anubisD1321115%0.05
dust2D81713%-0.01
overpassS76186%0.11
cache32167%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

293Matches
55%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
100.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
42%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis367%1.4735.7
Mirage2100%1.1417.0
Inferno250%0.9617.5
Dust22100%1.7628.0
Ancient1100%2.0731.0
Nuke10%2.5433.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
607msReaction time
17.2%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
7.84HE damage / grenade
13.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.1665% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–13-0.0923%17 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0115%13 Aug
mirage6–130.0333%13 Aug
anubis13–30.0210%11 Aug
dust213–7-0.0030%11 Aug
nuke4–130.0326%11 Aug
ancient13–90.1024%11 Aug
cache16–12-0.0021%10 Aug
mirage13–80.0314%10 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0220%6 Aug
ancient10–130.0323%6 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0210%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0012%1 Jul
ancient13–100.0219%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0217%23 Jun
ancient13–110.1421%23 Jun
overpass3–130.0839%23 Jun
ancient13–20.1710%28 May
nuke13–60.0318%28 May
mirage13–70.1118%28 May
overpass13–90.0422%28 May
dust210–130.0830%28 May
inferno13–50.0319%28 May
ancient5–13-0.0120%1 May
nuke11–13-0.0318%1 May
anubis5–130.0841%1 May
cache13–110.0227%1 May
nuke13–60.1426%25 Apr
ancient13–10.0838%25 Apr
inferno13–30.1927%25 Apr
mirage13–30.0956%25 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0314%22 Apr
nuke13–30.1221%11 Apr
inferno13–40.0241%11 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0122%4 Apr
nuke13–100.1320%4 Apr
nuke13–70.1730%4 Apr
ancient13–40.0614%4 Apr
mirage12–160.0621%4 Apr
anubis10–130.0313%2 Apr
ancient10–30.0211%2 Apr
anubis13–160.0015%7 Mar
overpass13–20.2314%7 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0212%7 Mar
mirage13–60.1121%7 Mar
dust28–130.0121%7 Mar
overpass13–20.1212%27 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0216%27 Feb
mirage13–110.0916%27 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0418%27 Feb
nuke11–130.0519%27 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0316%27 Feb
dust210–130.0418%21 Feb
ancient13–10.0017%21 Feb
anubis9–130.1123%21 Feb
nuke16–130.0619%21 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0220%14 Feb
mirage5–10.0633%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0212%14 Feb
anubis6–130.0425%14 Feb
inferno16–130.0619%13 Feb
anubis7–130.0422%13 Feb
inferno15–150.0423%13 Feb
overpass13–50.1226%13 Feb
ancient10–130.0018%13 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0224%13 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0418%12 Feb
nuke13–100.0023%12 Feb
overpass13–30.1415%12 Feb
dust22–13-0.0721%10 Feb
overpass13–50.0111%10 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0214%10 Feb
ancient13–20.0619%10 Feb
mirage7–130.0012%7 Feb
anubis12–160.0511%1 Feb
ancient10–130.038%1 Feb
mirage13–60.029%1 Feb
nuke13–100.0117%30 Jan
mirage8–130.0212%30 Jan
anubis13–10.1514%30 Jan
nuke13–10.0514%30 Jan
inferno16–130.1417%30 Jan
anubis9–130.0821%30 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0217%28 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0117%28 Jan
inferno13–80.1024%28 Jan
dust25–13-0.0521%28 Jan
anubis7–130.0522%28 Jan
ancient13–80.1018%28 Jan
inferno7–130.0322%24 Jan
ancient13–70.0717%24 Jan
nuke5–13-0.106%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0317%24 Jan
ancient13–5-0.016%24 Jan
nuke16–120.0019%18 Jan
ancient14–160.0836%17 Jan
dust23–13-0.0836%16 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0019%15 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0728%15 Jan
mirage13–90.1320%6 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →