csgochicken — CS2 Stats

76561199812340414[U:1:1852074686]

140Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
883Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4 · 938 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.1%42.5%44.2%2.1% short
Shot accuracy0.0%10.9%11.2%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.320.991.04above
Match win rate47.3%44.2%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcsgochickenFACEITLevel 4 · 938 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning55
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50419Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLLTWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression7.3
Utility3.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.5
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time694ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 694ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — poseidon 9–4
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 24ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2415963%-0.01
dust2A1710759%-0.01
infernoB157847%0.02
nukeB126650%-0.01
cacheA95456%0.04
poseidonD72529%0.01
anubisB63350%-0.00
ancientD51420%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.03
boulder1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,927Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1,213Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
42.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
5,926MVPs
299Hours (in match)
938Bombs planted
455Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,310inferno
1,395nuke
1,314dust2
339vertigo
56lake
30train
19italy
12ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
33%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
71.1ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20%0.4910.0
Dust2250%1.4417.0
Mirage1100%1.0015.0
Inferno10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
695msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
6.05HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.399 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8193% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass8–13-0.0016%24 Aug
dust213–40.0321%24 Aug
dust213–40.0325%24 Aug
nuke4–90.0637%24 Aug
cache7–130.0629%20 Aug
boulder1–13-0.0214%19 Aug
cache12–120.0514%19 Aug
inferno9–30.0810%18 Aug
cache13–50.1230%17 Aug
nuke12–12-0.017%16 Aug
dust21–13-0.090%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0824%15 Aug
dust213–20.0723%15 Aug
nuke4–130.0216%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0119%15 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0542%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0121%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0417%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0132%30 Jul
mirage13–3-0.084%30 Jul
nuke13–80.0414%30 Jul
dust213–70.0122%30 Jul
cache13–9-0.0140%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0229%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0318%29 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0210%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0723%26 Jul
poseidon8–80.0420%25 Jul
poseidon5–9-0.0827%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0724%13 Jul
nuke9–60.0933%12 Jul
cache4–13-0.0413%9 Jul
dust210–10.0329%9 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0317%9 Jul
cache0–4-0.0140%6 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0418%6 Jul
cache13–90.0419%6 Jul
mirage13–60.1129%5 Jul
inferno5–90.0233%18 May
poseidon5–9-0.0525%18 May
dust28–13-0.0321%15 May
mirage13–40.1626%10 May
cache13–100.0913%10 May
poseidon5–9-0.0333%8 May
mirage12–12-0.0130%5 May
mirage10–13-0.0316%4 May
cache13–20.0631%4 May
nuke12–12-0.0413%2 May
dust213–6-0.0132%2 May
overpass8–13-0.0617%2 May
inferno11–130.0422%12 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0335%12 Apr
poseidon6–9-0.0530%7 Apr
poseidon9–20.0418%7 Apr
inferno2–9-0.0533%7 Apr
inferno9–40.0733%7 Apr
poseidon9–40.2333%7 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0123%7 Apr
dust212–12-0.0212%6 Apr
inferno12–120.0421%17 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0820%13 Mar
ancient10–130.0420%13 Mar
inferno13–2-0.076%13 Mar
nuke2–9-0.1516%22 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0015%20 Feb
inferno13–80.0715%15 Feb
dust23–13-0.1229%15 Feb
anubis13–110.0118%15 Feb
overpass13–70.018%15 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0114%15 Feb
anubis16–14-0.056%12 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0416%12 Feb
dust28–13-0.0211%12 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0410%7 Feb
anubis13–90.0420%5 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0520%2 Feb
anubis6–130.0111%29 Jan
nuke13–60.0220%29 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0216%29 Jan
ancient9–130.0217%25 Jan
mirage13–70.0615%25 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0118%18 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0120%18 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0918%14 Jan
inferno13–00.1521%13 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0620%13 Jan
dust212–12-0.0415%12 Jan
mirage13–70.0013%11 Jan
dust29–13-0.0431%11 Jan
nuke13–80.0022%10 Jan
inferno7–30.0119%10 Jan
mirage13–20.0113%10 Jan
dust213–60.0128%10 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0714%10 Jan
dust213–40.0216%9 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0215%9 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0616%9 Jan
inferno12–120.0216%9 Jan
dust213–40.0117%30 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0713%30 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →