csgochicken

csgochicken — CS2 Stats

76561199812340414[U:1:1852074686]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

198Tracked matches66%Win rate2025Tracked since
936Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,461Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,461 +4,064 31 Aug – 25 Oct · 16 days played
14,39718,570peak 18,57031 Aug25 Oct
18,570Peak Premier in tracked matches
938Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 109 below peak (18,570)
  • +2,875 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,539 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.3%42.7%43.8%1.4% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.2%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.310.991.02above
Match win rate48.6%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcsgochickenFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,461 · Purple bandPEAK ELO938csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning56
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWLWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −7.2pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−135ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 11 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · cache, 11 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–2 · nuke, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
4–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 20dust2Weakest map · 53% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2012–860%-0.00
mirageS2016–480%0.01
dust2B179–853%0.01
nukeB158–753%0.00
cacheB137–654%0.02
ancientS54–180%0.00
anubis—41–325%-0.02
poseidon—30–30%-0.03
boulder—21–150%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,261Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1,315Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
42.3%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,234MVPs
322Hours (in match)
989Bombs planted
471Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,474inferno
1,479nuke
1,429dust2
339vertigo
56lake
30train
19italy
12cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20%0.4910.0
Mirage2100%1.2619.0
Dust2250%1.4417.0
Nuke10%1.3320.0
Inferno10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
577msReaction time
56.4%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
3.64HE damage / grenade
9.01Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0323%26 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0017%26 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.079%25 Oct →
nuke1–9-0.170%25 Oct →
nuke9–40.1720%21 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0812%21 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0113%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0227%19 Oct →
dust212–120.0314%19 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.016%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0421%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.0817%17 Oct →
dust213–00.1512%17 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0836%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0124%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0541%16 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0113%16 Oct →
mirage13–70.0524%16 Oct →
inferno9–00.026%16 Oct →
inferno9–20.0118%15 Oct →
mirage13–40.0413%14 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0322%14 Oct →
inferno8–80.1219%14 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0213%13 Oct →
cache10–0-0.0450%11 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0420%11 Oct →
inferno9–30.2226%11 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0511%9 Oct →
inferno6–10-0.034%9 Oct →
cache13–60.1127%9 Oct →
mirage13–70.0110%2 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0715%2 Oct →
nuke5–2-0.080%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0719%1 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1312%1 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0217%1 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0020%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.0020%26 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0217%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1110%25 Sept →
dust29–130.0219%24 Sept →
inferno13–10.0532%24 Sept →
boulder13–30.0316%23 Sept →
ancient13–20.0618%23 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0514%21 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0512%20 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0211%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0115%19 Sept →
inferno13–30.0320%12 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0519%12 Sept →
dust213–70.0118%12 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0410%12 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0113%1 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.087%31 Aug →
nuke13–60.0517%31 Aug →
dust27–130.0930%31 Aug →
overpass8–13-0.0016%24 Aug →
dust213–40.0321%24 Aug →
dust213–40.0325%24 Aug →
nuke4–90.0637%24 Aug →
cache7–130.0629%20 Aug →
boulder1–13-0.0214%19 Aug →
cache12–120.0514%19 Aug →
inferno9–30.0810%18 Aug →
cache13–50.1230%17 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.017%16 Aug →
dust21–13-0.090%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0824%15 Aug →
dust213–20.0723%15 Aug →
nuke4–130.0216%15 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0119%15 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0542%14 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0121%6 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0417%2 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0132%30 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.084%30 Jul →
nuke13–80.0414%30 Jul →
dust213–70.0122%30 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0140%29 Jul →
mirage13–110.0229%29 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0318%29 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0210%26 Jul →
mirage13–40.0723%26 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0420%25 Jul →
poseidon5–9-0.0827%25 Jul →
mirage13–80.0724%13 Jul →
nuke9–60.0933%12 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0413%9 Jul →
dust210–10.0329%9 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0317%9 Jul →
cache0–4-0.0140%6 Jul →
mirage13–1-0.0418%6 Jul →
cache13–90.0419%6 Jul →
mirage13–60.1129%5 Jul →
inferno5–90.0233%18 May →
poseidon5–9-0.0525%18 May →
dust28–13-0.0321%15 May →
mirage13–40.1626%10 May →
cache13–100.0913%10 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.