vedenjakaja

vedenjakaja — CS2 Stats

FI76561199801734929[U:1:1841469201]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

699Tracked matches60%Win rate2025Tracked since
939Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating18,100Purple band · top ~16.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,100 -1,372 6 Jun – 1 Nov · 29 days played
16,69620,496peak 20,4966 Jun1 Nov
20,496Peak Premier in tracked matches
59Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,396 below peak (20,496)
  • +591 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,900 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate65.3%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.681.071.090.41 short
Match win rate56.7%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvedenjakajaFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,100 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning57
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.85 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.7
Utility6.8
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.7% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 29 Aug →
71%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 27 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 31 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2411–1346%-0.01
infernoC156–940%-0.00
mirageS1310–377%0.02
nukeA138–562%0.00
anubisB126–650%-0.01
cacheB126–650%-0.01
ancientB105–550%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,954Lifetime kills
0.68K/D
866Matches
56.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
65.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,657MVPs
2,030Hours (in match)
932Bombs planted
369Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,613dust2
1,466nuke
1,147inferno
220train
105vertigo
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

580Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.9ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11249%1.0216.1
Ancient10750%1.0317.3
Anubis8250%1.0216.5
Dust27946%0.8915.1
Nuke7659%1.1617.3
Inferno6053%1.0716.7
Cache5349%1.0316.2
Overpass1050%0.9216.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
575msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.85Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
11.50HE damage / grenade
6.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1613% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–13-0.0227%1 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0423%1 Nov →
inferno13–110.0936%25 Oct →
dust26–130.0138%24 Oct →
dust213–80.1541%18 Oct →
dust213–100.0425%17 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0322%5 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0510%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0333%5 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0127%28 Sept →
cache13–10.0325%28 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0136%27 Sept →
cache13–70.1225%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0534%26 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0720%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0031%26 Sept →
dust213–160.0222%26 Sept →
dust25–00.000%24 Sept →
dust213–40.0628%24 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0122%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0135%14 Sept →
dust213–30.0322%13 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0124%10 Sept →
ancient10–130.0223%10 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0735%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0227%7 Sept →
mirage16–140.0034%4 Sept →
cache13–50.0538%4 Sept →
dust213–30.0223%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.0233%3 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0033%3 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0422%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0128%2 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0129%2 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.1017%1 Sept →
cache9–130.0031%1 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0231%1 Sept →
mirage13–20.1532%29 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0638%29 Aug →
inferno3–130.0142%28 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0119%27 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0331%26 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0530%25 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0338%23 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0130%22 Aug →
nuke13–20.0723%22 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0942%21 Aug →
dust213–100.0219%19 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0542%18 Aug →
anubis13–90.0327%17 Aug →
inferno13–30.1339%15 Aug →
ancient13–60.0622%14 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0820%12 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0739%12 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0327%11 Aug →
anubis13–90.0214%9 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0557%6 Aug →
ancient13–100.0522%4 Aug →
nuke11–130.0135%4 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0223%3 Aug →
anubis13–90.0320%3 Aug →
mirage13–90.0930%1 Aug →
anubis11–130.0439%1 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0119%1 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0626%31 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0135%28 Jul →
anubis0–7-0.020%28 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0229%27 Jul →
nuke13–100.0026%23 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0713%22 Jul →
nuke13–90.0334%22 Jul →
anubis13–60.0223%22 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0218%22 Jul →
cache11–130.0135%15 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0837%12 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0221%11 Jul →
dust213–10.0050%11 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0025%9 Jul →
nuke13–10.0126%9 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0342%9 Jul →
nuke13–80.0821%8 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0233%1 Jul →
nuke13–20.0533%1 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0571%27 Jun →
nuke0–13-0.120%27 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0224%21 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0124%21 Jun →
dust25–13-0.1164%14 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0629%14 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0326%12 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0235%10 Jun →
mirage13–90.0535%10 Jun →
nuke0–13-0.020%10 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0427%10 Jun →
nuke13–00.000%10 Jun →
ancient0–13-0.1050%9 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0123%9 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0330%8 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.0812%6 Jun →
mirage13–110.0433%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.