P(O)RO Hanys

P(O)RO Hanys — CS2 Stats

DM76561199767653645[U:1:1807387917]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

562Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
301Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,874Top 50% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,874 -7,746 12 Jan – 31 Oct · 22 days played
17,41726,620peak 26,62012 Jan31 Oct
26,620Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2026-01-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,746 below peak (26,620)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,126 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.3%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.221.021.03above
Match win rate59.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP(O)RO HanysFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,874 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning70
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–36–2Last 10062%Win rateWLLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +9.3pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.5
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 50% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning7.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.07
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time543ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.47Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 18 Apr →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 7 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 76% over 17mirageWeakest map · 50% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB189–950%0.05
anubisA1811–761%0.04
infernoS1713–476%0.10
nukeA148–657%0.03
dust2A148–657%0.04
cacheA74–357%0.05
ancientS64–267%0.07
overpass—33–0100%-0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,976Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
798Matches
59.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
44.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,167MVPs
301Hours (in match)
1,162Bombs planted
226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,461dust2
974inferno
743nuke
227vertigo
195train
3lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches
48%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8849%1.1015.4
Anubis3352%1.0216.8
Dust22733%0.8813.6
Ancient2631%1.0215.5
Inferno1953%1.1616.8
Nuke1958%0.9714.6
Vertigo683%0.9211.8
Cache633%1.0016.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
517msReaction time
64.8%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.16HE damage / grenade
7.07Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0220%31 Oct →
nuke1–9-0.2510%29 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0620%24 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0027%24 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0430%23 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%15 Oct →
mirage13–10.0629%15 Oct →
nuke11–130.0719%14 Oct →
anubis13–40.0627%14 Oct →
dust213–30.0446%7 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.032%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0315%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0819%5 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.070%26 Sept →
dust29–130.0412%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0315%26 Sept →
anubis9–130.0119%25 Sept →
inferno13–40.0824%25 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0328%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.1015%25 Sept →
mirage13–70.1328%25 Sept →
cache13–40.0928%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.0516%25 Sept →
overpass9–6-0.1414%24 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.039%15 Sept →
anubis13–70.0224%12 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.0719%10 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.088%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0618%10 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0217%1 Sept →
mirage11–130.0330%1 Sept →
dust210–130.0226%1 Sept →
anubis13–10.0310%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0921%23 Aug →
vertigo9–20.2422%23 Aug →
mirage2–130.0223%23 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0715%18 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0512%15 Aug →
vertigo0–9-0.289%14 Aug →
nuke13–50.0416%11 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0215%8 Aug →
mirage6–130.0210%7 Aug →
nuke12–160.0619%7 Aug →
mirage7–130.1522%6 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.034%2 Aug →
anubis10–130.0111%1 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0514%31 Jul →
inferno11–130.0422%11 Jun →
inferno13–110.1312%16 May →
dust213–100.0916%16 May →
ancient16–120.1412%14 May →
inferno8–130.0329%11 May →
dust216–130.0514%10 May →
nuke9–5-0.0123%10 May →
inferno9–00.2314%10 May →
dust213–30.2732%5 May →
mirage3–130.0921%5 May →
cache7–130.1424%4 May →
cache13–60.0529%4 May →
cache13–110.0317%4 May →
cache6–130.0117%4 May →
cache13–50.0727%4 May →
mirage13–1-0.0113%25 Apr →
vertigo9–70.0838%19 Apr →
nuke9–00.3829%19 Apr →
inferno9–10.3432%19 Apr →
inferno9–10.3230%18 Apr →
inferno9–20.4719%18 Apr →
anubis11–130.0530%6 Apr →
anubis13–50.0818%6 Apr →
mirage13–50.0518%28 Mar →
nuke13–90.0613%22 Mar →
inferno9–10.1925%6 Mar →
ancient7–130.0420%28 Feb →
dust213–80.0316%24 Feb →
mirage13–10.0214%24 Feb →
dust20–6-0.0613%22 Feb →
anubis13–30.0625%20 Feb →
anubis13–90.0715%17 Feb →
ancient13–60.2329%7 Feb →
mirage15–150.1320%6 Feb →
nuke13–70.0430%6 Feb →
inferno13–60.0134%6 Feb →
dust213–10.026%5 Feb →
mirage10–130.0522%5 Feb →
anubis13–90.0920%5 Feb →
mirage13–90.1321%5 Feb →
anubis15–150.0317%4 Feb →
ancient13–20.0916%25 Jan →
anubis13–70.0221%24 Jan →
anubis13–60.0211%24 Jan →
dust213–70.1327%24 Jan →
anubis13–00.1628%24 Jan →
overpass13–40.0212%24 Jan →
overpass13–80.0620%23 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0217%18 Jan →
dust213–70.0425%18 Jan →
mirage13–100.0117%18 Jan →
anubis13–50.0921%12 Jan →
mirage13–100.0915%12 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.