Hieromatuoli incident

Hieromatuoli incident — CS2 Stats

FI76561199654005076[U:1:1693739348]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

841Tracked matches35%Win rate2025Tracked since
565Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,518Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#63210 of 259939 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,208 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,518 -2,061 3 Sept – 16 Oct · 11 days played
21,37223,579peak 23,5793 Sept16 Oct
24,175Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,208Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,208
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,061 below peak (23,579)
  • -552 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,482 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate53.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.051.06meets
Match win rate53.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHieromatuoli incidentFACEITLevel 7 · 1,208 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,518 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,208csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning52
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWLWWLWTLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.2
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time584ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 16 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · inferno, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 16 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 8anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3214–1844%0.00
mirageB2311–1248%0.01
infernoC145–936%-0.01
anubisD103–730%-0.00
ancientB84–450%-0.01
nukeB84–450%0.01
cache—42–250%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,346Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
880Matches
53.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
53.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,257MVPs
318Hours (in match)
283Bombs planted
289Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,225dust2
1,082inferno
894nuke
193vertigo
132train
33office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
59%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
77.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23067%1.0914.4
Ancient2357%0.8915.1
Mirage2357%0.9312.0
Nuke956%0.8913.8
Anubis967%0.7913.9
Inferno838%0.8112.3
Overpass475%0.8413.8
Train250%1.007.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
585msReaction time
54.1%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
11.50HE damage / grenade
12.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0416%31 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0613%31 Oct →
ancient5–2-0.029%31 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0128%18 Oct →
mirage10–130.1235%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0217%18 Oct →
dust212–120.0728%16 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0320%16 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0320%16 Oct →
inferno13–00.2629%16 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0218%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0011%15 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0230%14 Oct →
mirage11–130.018%14 Oct →
mirage13–70.0317%13 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0515%13 Oct →
mirage3–130.0816%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0211%12 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0922%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0612%12 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0114%12 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0320%12 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0315%12 Oct →
mirage11–130.0417%12 Oct →
dust26–130.0221%12 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0817%11 Oct →
dust213–10.0427%11 Oct →
ancient12–120.0229%11 Oct →
inferno12–120.0126%11 Oct →
dust23–9-0.0215%11 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0330%8 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0243%7 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0432%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0618%5 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0115%5 Oct →
nuke13–110.0014%5 Oct →
inferno13–40.039%5 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0215%3 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.099%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1036%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0128%2 Oct →
mirage5–130.0120%1 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0524%1 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1345%1 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.0135%1 Oct →
mirage3–130.1024%1 Oct →
dust212–120.0618%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0223%1 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0533%29 Sept →
nuke13–00.0220%28 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0313%28 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.114%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.1023%28 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0332%28 Sept →
dust213–40.1817%27 Sept →
anubis11–130.0129%27 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0323%27 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0337%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0210%27 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0416%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.0928%26 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0215%26 Sept →
cache8–130.0314%26 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0924%26 Sept →
dust213–20.1444%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0030%26 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0424%26 Sept →
ancient13–0-0.0418%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0237%25 Sept →
anubis13–40.0224%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.1019%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0215%19 Sept →
nuke3–40.0722%19 Sept →
cache13–4-0.027%19 Sept →
dust25–130.0226%17 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0322%16 Sept →
mirage9–130.006%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0117%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0532%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0723%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0432%14 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0021%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0321%13 Sept →
ancient8–130.0118%13 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0123%13 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0128%13 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0130%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0127%12 Sept →
dust213–90.0220%12 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0328%3 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0119%3 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0529%3 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.078%3 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0913%3 Sept →
nuke13–110.0620%3 Sept →
overpass9–20.1121%2 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0616%2 Sept →
ancient13–40.0221%1 Sept →
anubis9–130.1722%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.