oatbob43

oatbob43 — CS2 Stats

DE76561199635206481[U:1:1674940753]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

539Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,524Grey band · top ~80.8% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,524 -7,013 24 Jul – 27 Oct · 37 days played
4,13811,537peak 11,53724 Jul27 Oct
11,537Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-07-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,013 below peak (11,537)
  • -196 over 30 days · steady
  • -3,456 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 476 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoatbob43PREMIER4,524 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning43
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateLWTWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −105ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.8
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 691ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time689ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 677ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 11–13 · inferno, 9 Jul →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · ancient, 23 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 31 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 14 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 8infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD237–1630%-0.03
nukeB2210–1245%-0.03
anubisC156–940%-0.00
cacheB157–847%-0.05
mirageC94–544%-0.01
infernoD82–625%0.01
dust2B84–450%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
691msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
10.53HE damage / grenade
3.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3998 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1942% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.059%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.0716%27 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0028%27 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0520%27 Oct →
inferno6–130.0115%27 Oct →
mirage0–3-0.010%25 Oct →
mirage13–40.0124%25 Oct →
nuke13–30.0712%24 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0214%24 Oct →
cache13–20.0019%24 Oct →
nuke13–50.017%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.0418%21 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0822%9 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0212%9 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0415%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0810%4 Oct →
mirage0–5-0.0560%3 Oct →
dust20–8-0.060%3 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0611%3 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0331%25 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0338%18 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0925%18 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0211%17 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0025%17 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0519%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.050%16 Sept →
cache12–14-0.0423%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0810%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.1025%11 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0950%7 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0114%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.110%6 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0740%6 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0211%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0222%2 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0610%2 Sept →
cache13–9-0.100%28 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0021%28 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0535%27 Aug →
cache1–4-0.040%27 Aug →
ancient13–100.0528%27 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.070%27 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.110%27 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.077%27 Aug →
ancient0–4-0.0175%23 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.076%23 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.030%18 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0429%18 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0422%17 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.060%17 Aug →
nuke13–110.0121%9 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0116%8 Aug →
nuke15–150.0110%6 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0527%6 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.100%6 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0522%6 Aug →
nuke6–8-0.0750%6 Aug →
inferno12–90.0315%6 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0538%5 Aug →
ancient11–20.0613%5 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0210%5 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0517%4 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0624%3 Aug →
nuke5–130.0115%3 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.084%2 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1023%2 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0522%1 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0611%1 Aug →
ancient13–20.028%1 Aug →
cache13–30.0615%31 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0414%31 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0530%30 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0711%30 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0121%30 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0117%28 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0720%27 Jul →
dust29–130.0117%27 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0411%27 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.060%26 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0944%26 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0424%26 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0610%26 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0436%26 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.1215%25 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.1223%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0814%25 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.090%25 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0133%25 Jul →
nuke16–130.0115%24 Jul →
anubis13–40.0914%24 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.046%14 Jul →
anubis13–10.1027%14 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0325%14 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0027%12 Jul →
ancient11–130.0212%12 Jul →
anubis13–90.1419%10 Jul →
nuke13–80.0418%9 Jul →
ancient13–60.1312%9 Jul →
inferno11–130.1720%9 Jul →
anubis13–110.0821%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.