epe

epe — CS2 Stats

FI76561199629196783[U:1:1668931055]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,509Tracked matches42%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,365Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,883Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84682 of 251275 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 631 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,883 -1,103 8 Sept – 11 Oct · 13 days played
19,88321,914peak 21,9148 Sept11 Oct
21,914Peak Premier in tracked matches
631Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-09-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 631
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,031 below peak (21,914)
  • -613 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 117 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.9%45.7%46.8%3.9% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.051.060.13 short
Match win rate48.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGepeFACEITLevel 7 · 631 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,883 · Purple bandPEAK ELO631csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning61
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–40–9Last 10051%Win rateLLLTLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.1
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact2.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time500ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 10 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 11–0 · anubis, 16 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–12 · office, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2012–860%0.03
infernoC125–742%0.01
ancientS107–370%0.01
dust2C94–544%0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.01
nukeA85–363%-0.01
mirageC52–340%0.04
vertigoD51–420%0.03
train—41–325%0.05
italy—42–250%0.01
fachwerk—31–233%0.07
overpass—33–0100%0.05
office—32–167%0.05
boulder—20–20%0.02
shelter—21–150%-0.03
poseidon—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,196Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,953Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
42.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
17,010MVPs
1,887Hours (in match)
3,535Bombs planted
1,834Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,700
AWP3,400
MP92,050
MAC-101,851
Tec-91,084

Lifetime map wins

12,070dust2
5,295nuke
4,282inferno
2,985vertigo
768train
394office
279italy
216lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

440Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8956%1.0114.8
Ancient8056%1.0615.8
Mirage6159%0.9014.2
Anubis6057%1.0316.6
Dust25443%0.9915.2
Cache2952%1.0415.9
Overpass2756%1.1516.6
Inferno2348%0.9315.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
503msReaction time
58.2%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
7.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.497 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0611%11 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0113%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.037%11 Oct →
mirage15–150.0115%11 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0213%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.2920%10 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.035%10 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.156%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0312%10 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0020%10 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0211%10 Oct →
poseidon9–40.0922%10 Oct →
inferno9–60.0419%9 Oct →
fachwerk12–120.1016%6 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0418%6 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0114%5 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0319%5 Oct →
boulder10–130.0316%4 Oct →
ancient5–00.0120%4 Oct →
dust211–20.1040%4 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0020%4 Oct →
anubis12–120.0513%4 Oct →
inferno15–150.0313%4 Oct →
anubis10–130.0017%4 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.098%4 Oct →
overpass13–50.0218%3 Oct →
overpass13–00.1413%3 Oct →
train12–120.1015%3 Oct →
office1–12-0.0321%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0416%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.0414%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0116%2 Oct →
anubis15–150.0215%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.0917%1 Oct →
office13–50.0514%30 Sept →
italy13–70.0020%30 Sept →
fachwerk11–13-0.0013%30 Sept →
nuke13–90.0319%30 Sept →
overpass13–1-0.0022%30 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0021%26 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0323%26 Sept →
inferno11–130.0418%26 Sept →
anubis13–70.0118%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0218%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.0225%26 Sept →
anubis13–10.1013%23 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
cache8–130.0724%19 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0414%19 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0013%19 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0123%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0619%18 Sept →
anubis13–50.1019%18 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0220%18 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0117%17 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.037%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0616%17 Sept →
ancient8–130.0113%17 Sept →
anubis13–70.0517%16 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0115%16 Sept →
anubis11–00.0741%16 Sept →
train9–130.0129%16 Sept →
train8–130.0120%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.1027%16 Sept →
italy13–3-0.0022%16 Sept →
italy5–130.0325%16 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0828%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0433%15 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0615%15 Sept →
cache13–110.0130%15 Sept →
ancient9–130.0617%14 Sept →
ancient16–130.0637%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0017%13 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0717%13 Sept →
ancient13–90.0240%13 Sept →
inferno9–30.099%13 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0218%12 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0626%12 Sept →
cache13–30.1137%12 Sept →
cache9–13-0.059%12 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0920%12 Sept →
office13–00.1411%12 Sept →
shelter13–11-0.0224%12 Sept →
fachwerk13–80.1119%11 Sept →
dust212–120.0719%11 Sept →
boulder12–120.0213%11 Sept →
italy6–130.0121%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0619%11 Sept →
anubis13–80.0311%11 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0315%9 Sept →
shelter5–13-0.0511%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.1010%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.0825%9 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0111%9 Sept →
nuke13–30.0211%9 Sept →
train13–30.0716%9 Sept →
inferno13–110.0617%9 Sept →
anubis10–130.0216%8 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0412%8 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0311%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.