Tohardtothinkaboutyk?

Tohardtothinkaboutyk? — CS2 Stats

PL76561199598725527[U:1:1638459799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

958Tracked matches61%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,308Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,952 +484 7 Sept – 25 Sept · 11 days played
13,46815,000peak 15,0007 Sept25 Sept
15,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
841Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 841
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTohardtothinkaboutyk?PEAK ELO841csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–42–8Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.4

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time604ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 25 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 13 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · anubis, 9 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 37nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3723–1462%-0.00
infernoA1810–856%0.01
dust2C145–936%-0.00
nukeD124–833%0.01
anubisB115–645%-0.03
ancientB63–350%-0.00
office—10–10%-0.04
cache—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,930Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
2,102Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
40.7%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,985MVPs
762Hours (in match)
2,351Bombs planted
630Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,347inferno
3,326nuke
2,997dust2
1,106vertigo
567train
233office
73italy
13ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

133Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
77.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4245%0.9213.8
Dust22454%0.9914.0
Inferno1861%0.9413.6
Ancient1650%0.8613.4
Anubis1547%0.9515.3
Nuke1464%1.0315.2
Overpass250%1.4421.5
Cache250%0.6611.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
600msReaction time
64.2%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
14.27HE damage / grenade
5.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.649% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0818%28 Oct →
mirage13–40.057%28 Oct →
dust210–130.0312%28 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0319%27 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0423%27 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0413%26 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0312%25 Oct →
mirage13–20.1513%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0610%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0515%25 Oct →
dust212–12-0.088%24 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0211%24 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0318%22 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0412%22 Oct →
mirage13–70.0420%21 Oct →
inferno1–10-0.0724%21 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.068%20 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0413%20 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0114%19 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0511%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0317%18 Oct →
mirage6–0-0.0120%18 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.026%18 Oct →
nuke13–90.1015%18 Oct →
nuke13–70.0620%18 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0223%18 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0215%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0015%17 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0818%16 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0019%16 Oct →
mirage9–130.0611%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0716%15 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0114%15 Oct →
mirage13–110.0115%14 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0021%14 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0723%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0312%13 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0021%13 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0312%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0113%9 Oct →
anubis13–00.0614%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0715%9 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.067%8 Oct →
inferno12–120.038%7 Oct →
dust29–130.0717%6 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0511%6 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0310%6 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0421%5 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0115%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0214%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0620%4 Oct →
dust213–90.049%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0213%3 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0117%3 Oct →
mirage13–10.0511%3 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0223%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0720%2 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0123%2 Oct →
mirage13–50.0215%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0020%25 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0216%25 Sept →
nuke13–90.0213%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0018%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.078%24 Sept →
ancient9–130.0314%24 Sept →
office5–13-0.0410%21 Sept →
inferno9–60.0226%21 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0410%20 Sept →
inferno13–100.0818%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0318%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.074%17 Sept →
anubis13–110.0514%17 Sept →
inferno15–150.1314%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0110%15 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0513%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0212%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0129%13 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0316%13 Sept →
mirage13–40.0225%13 Sept →
inferno13–50.1215%13 Sept →
ancient13–20.0419%13 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0016%13 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0214%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0310%12 Sept →
nuke8–130.1018%12 Sept →
dust213–90.0219%12 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0314%12 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0013%11 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0219%11 Sept →
inferno13–40.0122%11 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0215%10 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0314%10 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0318%10 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.078%9 Sept →
nuke14–160.0115%9 Sept →
anubis13–100.0217%8 Sept →
nuke8–130.0111%8 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.032%7 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.077%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.