t4pwtr蛟龍

t4pwtr蛟龍 — CS2 Stats

KR76561199568587728[U:1:1608322000]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,166Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,374Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,533 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,533 → 1,533
+49Tracked matches · now 1,166
−10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 22 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,533 +0 28 Aug2 Sept · 2 observations
1,5331,533peak 1,53328 Aug2 Sept
1,533Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,533
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 218 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,393), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.1%44.8%45.7%2.7% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.311.041.05above
Match win rate58.8%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGt4pwtr蛟龍FACEITLevel 6 · 1,533 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,533csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning71
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4258Last 10042%Win rateLLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.5
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time560ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 6–13 · mirage, 7 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 26 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 19–15 · ancient, 19 Aug
11–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%-0.01
dust2C2381535%0.00
ancientB1910953%-0.00
anubisC146843%-0.01
infernoA127558%0.02
cache41325%-0.02
nuke21150%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,887Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,036Matches
58.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 6 players
43.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,333MVPs
1,306Hours (in match)
3,872Bombs planted
589Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,336
AWP8,022
MP91,500
Tec-91,068
MAC-101,026

Lifetime map wins

4,723dust2
3,843nuke
3,636inferno
3,135vertigo
917train
1ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

597Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17649%1.1216.5
Dust214449%1.0616.4
Ancient10758%1.1917.5
Anubis5744%1.0815.9
Inferno5248%1.1215.9
Nuke3247%1.2418.5
Cache838%1.0117.3
Vertigo862%1.0713.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
559msReaction time
44.3%T opening success
59.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.79HE damage / grenade
11.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0321%13 Sept
dust214–16-0.0433%13 Sept
anubis13–110.0516%11 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0123%11 Sept
dust220–220.0225%8 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0316%7 Sept
dust214–160.0213%5 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0226%2 Sept
mirage13–90.009%30 Aug
mirage13–110.0115%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0111%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0117%29 Aug
inferno10–130.0211%28 Aug
mirage11–00.1211%28 Aug
dust210–130.0424%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0412%24 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0512%23 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0211%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0413%22 Aug
ancient11–130.028%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0110%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0415%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0215%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0816%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.1118%21 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0010%21 Aug
dust213–110.0123%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0020%20 Aug
ancient16–140.0512%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.038%19 Aug
ancient19–150.0217%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0617%19 Aug
ancient10–130.0420%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0216%19 Aug
dust216–130.0714%18 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0114%18 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0511%18 Aug
ancient19–17-0.0221%18 Aug
cache9–13-0.0613%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0117%13 Aug
inferno13–100.0210%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0012%11 Aug
cache9–130.0010%10 Aug
dust26–13-0.0820%8 Aug
dust216–120.0418%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0219%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0519%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.104%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0525%8 Aug
dust25–130.0416%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0116%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0314%7 Aug
dust216–120.0516%7 Aug
mirage6–130.1223%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0618%7 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0523%7 Aug
ancient13–100.0031%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0215%6 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0419%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0120%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0221%1 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0310%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0420%31 Jul
cache16–14-0.0117%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0120%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0413%26 Jul
inferno13–50.0421%23 Jul
inferno13–90.0315%23 Jul
dust214–160.0017%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0618%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.059%21 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0234%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0224%20 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0016%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0623%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0025%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0221%17 Jul
anubis11–130.0113%16 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0615%15 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0027%15 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0421%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0219%14 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0419%14 Jul
inferno9–130.0113%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0322%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0720%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0015%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0610%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0226%8 Jul
inferno11–00.0224%8 Jul
dust213–70.0823%7 Jul
mirage13–90.0115%7 Jul
inferno10–130.0017%7 Jul
inferno13–80.0824%4 Jul
dust24–13-0.0715%4 Jul
dust213–100.0525%27 Jun
dust213–50.0343%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0527%25 Jun
dust213–160.0320%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0922%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →