CleverestSurvival

CleverestSurvival — CS2 Stats

76561199561924405[U:1:1601658677]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

527Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,523Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,376Blue band · top ~37% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 2 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,376 +6,028 2 Jun13 Sept · 22 days played
7,34814,179peak 14,1792 Jun13 Sept
14,488Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-06-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 803 below peak (14,179)
  • -803 over 30 days · declining
  • +5,505 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,624 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=19,543), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate33.1%41.9%44.3%11.2% short
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.100.981.03above
Match win rate34.4%43.8%45.2%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCleverestSurvivalPREMIER13,376 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning42
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateLLLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.7
Utility3.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time642ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 2 Jun
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 12 Jun
477msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 26 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 22infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS32211166%0.02
dust2S2216673%-0.00
infernoC145936%-0.02
nukeC135838%0.00
ancientA138562%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.02
cache1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,395Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 25% of Blue band
4,623Matches
34.4%Match win rate
33.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,470MVPs
973Hours (in match)
1,193Bombs planted
1,205Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP9,330
AK-478,022
Negev4,631
P904,504
SG 5533,196
MP73,098
AUG3,042

Lifetime map wins

12,163dust2
1,655inferno
836nuke
593vertigo
338ar_shoots
162ar_baggage
103train
58office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

99Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23746%0.9214.4
Mirage3247%1.1213.9
Ancient1155%0.7112.1
Nuke956%1.3117.6
Anubis667%1.2215.3
Inferno450%1.0311.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
27.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.0%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
644msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
7.39HE damage / grenade
2.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4795 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9676% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0414%18 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0517%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0130%13 Sept
mirage13–60.0120%13 Sept
dust29–13-0.086%13 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0122%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0120%12 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0822%12 Sept
dust213–60.0118%12 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0116%8 Sept
nuke13–110.0110%8 Sept
ancient8–130.0015%26 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0615%26 Aug
mirage10–130.0716%26 Aug
dust213–90.0026%21 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1124%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.004%14 Aug
dust213–80.0822%14 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0511%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.068%14 Aug
inferno9–70.0426%31 Jul
dust213–8-0.0120%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0314%30 Jul
inferno13–10.0123%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.0321%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0212%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0012%29 Jul
cache5–13-0.0910%29 Jul
dust212–16-0.0313%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0124%27 Jul
inferno13–90.0132%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0020%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0013%26 Jul
dust213–50.089%26 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0110%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0526%18 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0014%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0910%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0716%10 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0213%10 Jul
ancient13–90.0011%8 Jul
mirage13–20.1014%8 Jul
anubis13–40.0616%8 Jul
dust213–20.0112%8 Jul
dust212–120.0213%7 Jul
anubis13–30.0410%5 Jul
dust20–13-0.000%3 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0629%3 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0019%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0526%3 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1617%3 Jul
ancient13–90.0320%30 Jun
dust213–20.0319%30 Jun
nuke13–20.0814%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.078%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.018%26 Jun
nuke7–13-0.089%26 Jun
mirage13–70.029%26 Jun
inferno7–90.0112%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0028%21 Jun
mirage6–130.0319%20 Jun
ancient14–160.0415%20 Jun
ancient13–80.0125%20 Jun
nuke8–130.0115%16 Jun
mirage13–100.0516%16 Jun
mirage3–130.0422%16 Jun
inferno13–40.068%16 Jun
mirage16–140.0319%14 Jun
dust216–140.0618%14 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0214%14 Jun
inferno15–150.0316%12 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0016%12 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0114%12 Jun
dust213–30.0133%12 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0715%12 Jun
inferno13–16-0.1019%12 Jun
nuke13–60.0015%10 Jun
mirage13–110.0120%10 Jun
mirage13–60.0313%10 Jun
dust213–60.0325%10 Jun
mirage13–60.1124%7 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0213%7 Jun
dust213–100.0617%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0212%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0624%7 Jun
mirage13–60.1115%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0521%5 Jun
inferno10–130.0121%5 Jun
mirage9–130.0624%5 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0820%5 Jun
dust213–10-0.0118%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0421%5 Jun
mirage13–50.067%4 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0119%4 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0115%4 Jun
dust215–15-0.0519%4 Jun
nuke6–13-0.037%3 Jun
mirage13–60.017%3 Jun
ancient13–100.0317%2 Jun
nuke13–10.2321%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →