Snipey

Snipey — CS2 Stats

76561199520240630[U:1:1559974902]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

337Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
870Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80666 of 251657 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 -439 28 Aug – 1 Oct · 10 days played
19,30621,503peak 21,50328 Aug1 Oct
21,503Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,503 below peak (21,503)
  • -148 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate48.5%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy4.7%11.3%12.0%7.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.780.991.020.23 short
Match win rate46.5%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnipeyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning42
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–52–4Last 10044%Win rateLLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +130ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility2.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.2
Utility2.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time548ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 5 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 6 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 11 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC4017–2343%-0.01
dust2C3716–2143%-0.03
infernoA74–357%-0.02
nukeD61–517%-0.03
ancientA53–260%-0.02
cache—22–0100%-0.00
office—10–10%-0.13
anubis—11–0100%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,282Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
544Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
48.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4.7%Shot accuracy
1,207MVPs
225Hours (in match)
343Bombs planted
120Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,091dust2
411inferno
294nuke
198vertigo
160office
54train
50cbble
38italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
0%Win rate
0.47Avg K/D
34.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Train10%0.214.0
Ancient10%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
550msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
1.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4005 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9016% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1–13-0.080%7 Oct →
office6–13-0.1325%7 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0520%7 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.1027%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.066%1 Oct →
mirage6–130.0116%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0027%29 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0327%25 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1017%25 Sept →
dust211–13-0.039%24 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0423%23 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0418%23 Sept →
nuke13–00.000%23 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.033%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0414%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0411%21 Sept →
dust27–130.0320%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0313%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0917%20 Sept →
nuke12–120.0117%20 Sept →
inferno7–130.0024%20 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0118%20 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0128%20 Sept →
dust28–10.0130%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0415%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0016%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0518%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1014%20 Sept →
dust29–40.0111%20 Sept →
dust213–6-0.038%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0612%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0120%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.059%18 Sept →
dust213–40.048%18 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0522%18 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0711%18 Sept →
dust21–9-0.170%17 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0219%17 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0314%17 Sept →
cache13–110.045%17 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.134%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.063%16 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0611%16 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.070%16 Sept →
mirage13–40.000%16 Sept →
mirage4–9-0.069%16 Sept →
dust213–110.0313%16 Sept →
dust211–13-0.033%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.076%14 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0717%14 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0120%14 Sept →
mirage10–130.0131%13 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.039%13 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.1017%13 Sept →
mirage9–00.1433%13 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
mirage12–120.0515%13 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0019%13 Sept →
dust27–4-0.0550%13 Sept →
dust213–00.0313%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0114%13 Sept →
dust29–13-0.068%11 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0119%11 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.040%11 Sept →
mirage9–30.0433%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1213%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0517%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.0012%8 Sept →
mirage13–70.028%8 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.064%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0217%6 Sept →
mirage12–120.036%6 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0513%6 Sept →
dust213–00.11100%6 Sept →
inferno13–0-0.0033%6 Sept →
inferno5–6-0.0125%6 Sept →
mirage13–10.0311%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0215%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0312%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0230%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0521%5 Sept →
mirage13–10.146%5 Sept →
dust213–80.0115%5 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0115%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.0417%4 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0611%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0412%4 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0311%3 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0644%3 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0533%3 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0324%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0624%3 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0610%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0116%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.0314%3 Sept →
mirage13–110.0118%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0413%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.069%3 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0250%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.