Ratlosky

Ratlosky — CS2 Stats

GL76561199506368472[U:1:1546102744]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,380Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,414Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,638Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,638 -3,565 30 Jun – 26 Sept · 8 days played
16,52121,926peak 21,92630 Jun26 Sept
21,926Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-06-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,288 below peak (21,926)
  • -3,565 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,362 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches34——
Win rate68%——
K/D1.09——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.0%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy2.0%12.7%13.0%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.051.06meets
Match win rate45.9%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRatloskyFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,638 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning59
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–49–8Last 10043%Win rateWWWLLLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time563ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 30 Jun →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 4–3 · mirage, 14 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 30 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2310–1343%0.02
dust2D155–1033%0.01
mirageC156–940%-0.00
anubisC104–640%0.04
nukeC73–443%0.01
ancientS75–271%0.07
infernoS64–267%0.01
vertigo—41–325%-0.07
poseidon—42–250%0.04
train—31–233%-0.01
boulder—30–30%0.03
fachwerk—21–150%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,424Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,896Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
46.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2.0%Shot accuracy
12,485MVPs
2,414Hours (in match)
3,480Bombs planted
1,674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,167
AWP9,509
SSG 082,703
MP91,677
FAMAS1,592

Lifetime map wins

5,758dust2
5,108inferno
4,352nuke
4,317vertigo
2,091train
976office
277lake
200cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
53%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
84.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1867%1.3316.4
Anubis1164%1.1716.4
Dust21127%1.2118.1
Vertigo1050%1.0615.6
Inferno838%1.3714.8
Ancient862%1.2618.3
Nuke757%1.2213.1
Office10%0.7518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
556msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4796 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.288% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0612%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0112%23 Sept →
cache13–90.1019%23 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0511%18 Sept →
train10–130.0014%16 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0111%16 Sept →
anubis13–20.0717%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0617%14 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0415%14 Sept →
dust215–150.0224%14 Sept →
mirage4–3-0.1043%14 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0113%12 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0121%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0620%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0324%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.0410%5 Sept →
mirage10–130.0420%5 Sept →
ancient13–70.0820%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.1322%28 Aug →
dust23–70.0219%19 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0131%16 Aug →
cache13–40.0011%7 Aug →
inferno9–70.0618%7 Aug →
vertigo1–13-0.0711%26 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0110%25 Jul →
overpass9–50.1619%25 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0114%24 Jul →
dust25–13-0.084%24 Jul →
anubis9–130.0218%24 Jul →
anubis6–130.0515%22 Jul →
anubis13–10.166%22 Jul →
anubis13–100.1630%22 Jul →
anubis13–50.1017%21 Jul →
nuke4–40.0125%21 Jul →
inferno3–130.0530%20 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0218%20 Jul →
cache10–130.0621%18 Jul →
ancient9–130.0516%18 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0133%18 Jul →
boulder2–13-0.019%18 Jul →
nuke6–130.0717%17 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0119%17 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0218%17 Jul →
cache13–30.1026%17 Jul →
boulder5–130.0511%16 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0313%15 Jul →
dust210–130.0113%15 Jul →
ancient16–140.0526%15 Jul →
mirage16–130.0718%15 Jul →
cache13–10.0717%14 Jul →
cache4–9-0.0415%14 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0115%14 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0118%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0511%12 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0511%12 Jul →
cache9–130.0922%11 Jul →
cache13–90.0726%10 Jul →
vertigo7–13-0.0817%10 Jul →
boulder11–130.0619%10 Jul →
dust213–110.0426%10 Jul →
fachwerk11–13-0.0013%10 Jul →
cache8–130.0032%10 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0027%9 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0414%9 Jul →
mirage10–130.0116%9 Jul →
mirage6–130.0414%9 Jul →
dust213–00.1018%9 Jul →
fachwerk13–9-0.0223%9 Jul →
train12–120.0419%7 Jul →
dust212–120.0019%7 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0022%7 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.090%7 Jul →
vertigo13–6-0.0310%7 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0420%6 Jul →
cache13–00.0228%6 Jul →
cache10–130.0125%6 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0227%4 Jul →
train13–11-0.0628%4 Jul →
inferno13–40.0219%4 Jul →
dust211–130.0625%4 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0525%4 Jul →
vertigo0–6-0.110%4 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0024%4 Jul →
cache12–120.0423%3 Jul →
cache9–130.0920%3 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0226%3 Jul →
dust213–60.0820%3 Jul →
cache13–100.0110%3 Jul →
cache13–90.1114%3 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0114%3 Jul →
poseidon6–9-0.1120%30 Jun →
poseidon5–9-0.1118%30 Jun →
poseidon9–50.1418%30 Jun →
poseidon9–10.2325%30 Jun →
nuke13–00.059%30 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0614%30 Jun →
ancient13–30.0626%30 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0321%30 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0619%30 Jun →
mirage13–20.0417%30 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.