Pedro Pedro

Pedro Pedro — CS2 Stats

76561199503450547[U:1:1543184819]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

427Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
392Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,738 +109 22 Feb – 2 Jul · 24 days played
4,6757,363peak 7,36322 Feb2 Jul
7,463Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-02-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning47
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.8 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility4.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time571ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 10.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 29 Apr →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 29 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–2 · ancient, 2 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB157–847%-0.02
anubisS1410–471%0.02
infernoB137–654%0.01
mirageB137–654%-0.00
dust2C104–640%-0.00
cacheA95–456%0.01
nukeD92–722%-0.01
poseidonS75–271%0.00
vertigoS64–267%0.02
sanctum—21–150%-0.05
overpass—11–0100%-0.02
stronghold—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,101Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
979Matches
43.7%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
3.9%Shot accuracy
1,870MVPs
392Hours (in match)
1,450Bombs planted
214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,485dust2
1,294inferno
882nuke
587vertigo
313train
50lake
31office
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
100%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
63.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
573msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1044% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9292% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0112%1 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0014%1 Aug →
ancient8–130.0117%31 Jul →
dust213–40.0110%31 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0614%31 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0123%31 Jul →
inferno9–10.1320%31 Jul →
poseidon9–10.094%31 Jul →
inferno5–90.1211%31 Jul →
poseidon9–50.0414%31 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0010%30 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0223%30 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0929%29 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0013%29 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0516%29 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0314%2 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0910%2 Jul →
ancient4–2-0.120%2 Jul →
inferno13–80.0613%1 Jul →
anubis13–100.0317%1 Jul →
overpass13–11-0.0213%29 Jun →
inferno16–13-0.122%29 Jun →
ancient9–130.0216%29 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0013%28 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0313%27 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0619%25 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0212%25 Jun →
mirage11–60.056%25 Jun →
vertigo9–4-0.0015%25 Jun →
mirage11–130.016%23 Jun →
nuke10–130.0322%22 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0311%22 Jun →
vertigo9–60.0814%22 Jun →
anubis13–70.096%22 Jun →
anubis5–130.049%18 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0312%15 Jun →
inferno13–60.007%5 May →
anubis13–50.059%5 May →
vertigo9–30.0010%5 May →
dust211–13-0.0415%4 May →
ancient7–13-0.0118%4 May →
vertigo7–9-0.1116%4 May →
cache13–10-0.0016%29 Apr →
cache13–10.148%29 Apr →
cache13–80.0424%29 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0011%29 Apr →
cache13–40.137%29 Apr →
cache1–13-0.0719%29 Apr →
ancient13–80.0516%27 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0811%27 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0713%27 Apr →
dust216–12-0.029%27 Apr →
anubis13–40.0511%26 Apr →
mirage13–110.0914%26 Apr →
nuke1–13-0.0513%22 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.059%22 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0313%20 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.080%16 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.025%16 Apr →
sanctum9–2-0.0410%10 Apr →
poseidon9–7-0.122%10 Apr →
poseidon7–90.0219%10 Apr →
dust213–110.0215%9 Apr →
poseidon9–40.078%9 Apr →
inferno13–90.0315%9 Apr →
poseidon6–9-0.049%9 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0516%9 Apr →
vertigo9–70.013%9 Apr →
mirage8–130.036%8 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.047%8 Apr →
vertigo7–90.119%8 Apr →
mirage13–100.0514%8 Apr →
poseidon9–2-0.065%8 Apr →
sanctum8–8-0.0621%8 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.017%8 Apr →
anubis13–100.0713%8 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.042%8 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0214%8 Apr →
stronghold5–13-0.036%21 Mar →
inferno9–130.0611%21 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0619%21 Mar →
inferno9–60.0613%21 Mar →
nuke15–150.068%19 Mar →
anubis13–8-0.037%19 Mar →
dust215–150.0313%18 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.063%18 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.027%17 Mar →
ancient13–50.0213%17 Mar →
nuke13–80.0411%16 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0114%16 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.013%25 Feb →
ancient16–140.0213%24 Feb →
anubis13–80.099%24 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0416%23 Feb →
mirage13–70.0220%23 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.024%23 Feb →
dust26–130.089%23 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0410%23 Feb →
inferno6–130.0117%23 Feb →
nuke12–160.0310%22 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.