Butt Lightyear

Butt Lightyear — CS2 Stats

NO76561199185985321[U:1:1225719593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

541Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
304Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,897Blue band · top ~44.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,897 -1,786 26 Jul – 3 Sept · 11 days played
11,89714,596peak 14,59626 Jul3 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-07-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,699 below peak (14,596)
  • -2,105 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,103 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 12 Oct 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate52.9%42.0%44.3%above
Shot accuracy2.8%9.6%11.9%9.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.160.981.03above
Match win rate50.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGButt LightyearPREMIER11,897 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning47
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLWWWLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · −129ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.7
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time610ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 6 Sept →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · poseidon, 31 Jul →
367msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 29 Jul →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB4721–2645%-0.00
mirageC166–1038%-0.03
nukeC83–538%0.02
anubisS86–275%-0.01
dust2B63–350%0.02
poseidonB63–350%0.08
cache—40–40%-0.00
ancient—43–175%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,674Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Blue band
931Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 10% of Blue band
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
2.8%Shot accuracy
2,650MVPs
304Hours (in match)
492Bombs planted
155Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,744inferno
1,342dust2
994nuke
192office
35vertigo
28train
18italy
3cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
638msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
9.75HE damage / grenade
8.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–9-0.176%8 Sept →
inferno9–60.059%8 Sept →
inferno9–30.0213%7 Sept →
inferno9–20.1618%6 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.208%6 Sept →
inferno9–00.3720%6 Sept →
inferno9–40.118%5 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.1019%4 Sept →
inferno2–80.0420%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0227%3 Sept →
mirage2–12-0.0644%3 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0514%3 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0010%3 Sept →
inferno9–50.0824%3 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0322%3 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.129%3 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.1016%3 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0617%2 Sept →
mirage8–130.0119%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0422%2 Sept →
nuke13–70.0814%2 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1526%2 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.1028%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0512%2 Sept →
poseidon9–40.1834%2 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0424%1 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0529%1 Sept →
mirage4–0-0.0050%1 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.1310%31 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.106%31 Aug →
inferno9–50.017%31 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1436%31 Aug →
inferno9–50.1833%31 Aug →
mirage7–130.0125%31 Aug →
nuke6–130.1418%31 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0513%31 Aug →
inferno7–90.0835%31 Aug →
inferno9–10.0828%31 Aug →
inferno9–6-0.0119%31 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.177%31 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0917%30 Aug →
inferno9–30.0325%30 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.0931%30 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0225%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.0213%28 Aug →
inferno9–30.0117%28 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1020%27 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1825%27 Aug →
inferno8–80.0128%27 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0822%27 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0019%26 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0413%26 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0412%26 Aug →
inferno9–40.1921%26 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0223%26 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0542%26 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1116%25 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0112%25 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0114%25 Aug →
nuke9–70.1614%22 Aug →
poseidon8–80.0830%22 Aug →
poseidon9–40.1220%22 Aug →
inferno9–10.2932%4 Aug →
poseidon7–90.0530%4 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1519%4 Aug →
inferno7–90.0424%4 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.1127%4 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0317%3 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0535%3 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0116%3 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0510%3 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0419%3 Aug →
vertigo4–90.0115%3 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0315%1 Aug →
ancient13–70.0116%1 Aug →
cache11–130.1019%1 Aug →
dust28–130.0519%1 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0718%31 Jul →
dust213–40.0119%31 Jul →
nuke7–130.0228%31 Jul →
dust213–70.0824%31 Jul →
inferno9–30.1814%31 Jul →
inferno9–50.099%31 Jul →
inferno9–10.266%31 Jul →
poseidon9–10.1863%31 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.228%31 Jul →
anubis13–110.0212%31 Jul →
ancient16–120.0512%30 Jul →
mirage16–130.0418%30 Jul →
anubis13–50.0519%30 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0424%29 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.047%29 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0317%29 Jul →
inferno9–30.0724%29 Jul →
dust211–130.0312%28 Jul →
anubis13–30.068%28 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0411%28 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.1017%27 Jul →
mirage11–130.0113%26 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0510%26 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.