QuakEv!L ☭

QuakEv!L ☭ — CS2 Stats

MT76561199489376683[U:1:1529110955]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,042Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,367Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.8%45.7%46.8%4.0% short
Shot accuracy8.1%12.7%13.0%4.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.161.051.06above
Match win rate43.5%45.7%46.3%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQuakEv!L ☭FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning63
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–38–8Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility3.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time574ms−121ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 21 Aug →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 1–8 · inferno, 28 Aug →
352msFastest reaction time · 1–8 · inferno, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3117–1455%0.03
dust2B179–853%0.02
mirageS1410–471%0.01
nukeC125–742%0.00
cacheB84–450%0.03
ancient—42–250%-0.02
vertigo—42–250%0.02
overpass—32–167%-0.11
poseidon—30–30%-0.07
eldorado—11–0100%0.06
fachwerk—11–0100%0.05
anubis—11–0100%0.01
train—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,408Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,020Matches
43.5%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
8.1%Shot accuracy
6,464MVPs
743Hours (in match)
1,233Bombs planted
507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,222
AWP6,408
P901,580
SSG 081,513
FAMAS1,015

Lifetime map wins

765,787cbble
765,757assault
76,576piranesi
7,765aztec
7,657prodigy
3,997dust2
2,436inferno
874nuke

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11252%1.0415.3
Dust27947%1.0516.1
Anubis3574%1.1417.3
Ancient3450%1.1015.1
Inferno2952%1.0815.7
Nuke1560%0.9313.7
Cache1258%1.0715.8
Train3100%1.4022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
592msReaction time
51.8%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.464 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0128%6 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0325%25 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0612%25 Sept →
mirage16–130.0028%24 Sept →
dust29–130.0522%23 Sept →
inferno9–20.1143%23 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0633%22 Sept →
inferno16–130.0428%12 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0128%12 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0145%12 Sept →
dust213–80.0626%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0230%11 Sept →
inferno9–20.0740%11 Sept →
inferno7–90.0623%11 Sept →
dust213–100.0232%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0318%10 Sept →
dust211–130.0220%10 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0220%3 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.0518%2 Sept →
inferno9–60.0824%2 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1423%2 Sept →
inferno5–90.0623%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0323%2 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0317%2 Sept →
cache10–130.0613%1 Sept →
cache10–130.0823%1 Sept →
eldorado9–70.0615%1 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0412%29 Aug →
overpass9–6-0.0335%28 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.1714%28 Aug →
inferno1–8-0.0357%28 Aug →
inferno3–90.0515%28 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.028%24 Aug →
ancient13–60.0129%24 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0020%24 Aug →
dust213–90.099%24 Aug →
cache11–130.0219%24 Aug →
fachwerk13–60.0524%24 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0320%23 Aug →
mirage13–90.0028%23 Aug →
inferno13–70.2021%23 Aug →
inferno9–00.2142%23 Aug →
nuke8–80.0227%23 Aug →
mirage15–19-0.0216%23 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1421%23 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0229%23 Aug →
inferno8–80.0127%23 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.1236%23 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.2643%21 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1719%21 Aug →
nuke9–60.0417%21 Aug →
inferno9–60.0313%21 Aug →
inferno6–30.0524%21 Aug →
inferno9–60.0021%21 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0216%21 Aug →
vertigo6–9-0.0321%21 Aug →
nuke9–60.0514%21 Aug →
vertigo9–70.1328%21 Aug →
nuke9–20.1823%21 Aug →
inferno9–30.2233%21 Aug →
inferno9–10.3620%21 Aug →
anubis16–120.0121%18 Aug →
dust213–70.0230%14 Aug →
train10–13-0.0529%12 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1117%12 Aug →
nuke9–60.0340%12 Aug →
nuke8–80.0217%12 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0230%11 Aug →
cache13–50.1633%11 Aug →
inferno13–10.0324%11 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.018%10 Aug →
poseidon3–9-0.1327%10 Aug →
overpass9–3-0.0612%10 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.0820%10 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.0220%7 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0324%6 Aug →
inferno9–60.1916%6 Aug →
ancient13–1-0.0316%31 Jul →
dust216–120.0528%31 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0820%29 Jul →
inferno13–90.0929%29 Jul →
mirage13–110.0316%28 Jul →
dust213–50.0621%28 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0633%26 Jul →
dust213–40.0718%26 Jul →
dust212–120.0828%26 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0221%26 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0220%26 Jul →
nuke9–30.0412%22 Jul →
overpass0–9-0.2345%22 Jul →
vertigo9–10.0125%22 Jul →
cache13–90.0321%20 Jul →
inferno13–60.0927%20 Jul →
cache13–110.0326%20 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0220%20 Jul →
mirage13–90.1024%20 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0319%20 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0712%18 Jul →
mirage2–130.0916%15 Jul →
mirage13–80.0816%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.