Imbadatcs

Imbadatcs — CS2 Stats

76561199476509000[U:1:1516243272]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

498Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,160Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,761Purple band · top ~17.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,761 +2,762 2 Jul – 19 Oct · 10 days played
14,99919,988peak 19,9882 Jul19 Oct
19,988Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-06-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,227 below peak (19,988)
  • -1,669 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,239 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate66.7%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.1%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.421.031.05above
Match win rate46.3%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGImbadatcsFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,761 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning68
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility2.7
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.8
Utility2.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time541ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 30 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 6 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 6 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9vertigoWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2716–1159%0.02
dust2B2311–1248%0.04
ancientA149–564%0.06
cacheS96–367%0.04
infernoA74–357%0.03
vertigoD50–50%0.02
anubisA53–260%0.02
train—42–250%-0.01
office—32–167%0.09
nuke—31–233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,710Lifetime kills
1.42K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
1,330Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
66.7%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
4,366MVPs
2,586Hours (in match)
1,224Bombs planted
479Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,016dust2
1,075nuke
883inferno
418vertigo
106train
77office
11ar_shoots
2italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

79Matches
51%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
98.9ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22454%1.5620.4
Mirage2148%1.2319.7
Ancient1155%1.7622.6
Nuke956%1.0720.3
Inferno633%1.5622.3
Anubis540%1.0414.4
Cache367%1.2318.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
547msReaction time
67.8%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
4.02HE damage / grenade
2.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8371 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–90.1029%29 Oct →
cache13–80.0321%25 Oct →
cache11–130.0526%25 Oct →
dust211–130.0517%19 Oct →
nuke13–40.0425%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0829%10 Oct →
train10–13-0.0019%7 Oct →
train9–0-0.0125%7 Oct →
mirage8–2-0.0111%6 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.1250%6 Oct →
ancient5–110.0925%6 Oct →
dust23–100.0044%28 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.018%28 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0018%23 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
vertigo10–130.1119%23 Sept →
anubis12–120.0317%18 Sept →
anubis4–00.1233%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0111%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0638%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.0610%15 Sept →
mirage13–30.0522%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0216%13 Sept →
mirage13–40.0928%12 Sept →
office13–90.0919%2 Sept →
office6–130.0822%2 Sept →
cache13–70.1432%27 Aug →
ancient13–50.0323%26 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0725%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0118%26 Aug →
cache0–13-0.0516%26 Aug →
cache9–130.0622%26 Aug →
cache13–30.0913%19 Aug →
dust213–00.1323%18 Aug →
mirage16–140.0324%18 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0426%16 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0127%16 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0511%15 Aug →
train13–9-0.0121%15 Aug →
train12–12-0.0436%14 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0329%14 Aug →
dust213–20.0821%14 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0414%12 Aug →
inferno9–20.1715%12 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0215%12 Aug →
mirage5–130.0634%12 Aug →
dust25–130.0219%12 Aug →
dust211–10.0430%10 Aug →
mirage13–40.0622%10 Aug →
dust211–130.0229%8 Aug →
mirage13–60.1127%8 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0240%8 Aug →
dust28–130.0313%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0325%6 Aug →
dust213–30.0524%6 Aug →
nuke1–130.0217%5 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0615%4 Aug →
ancient3–00.000%4 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0428%4 Aug →
inferno13–60.0822%3 Aug →
mirage13–70.0425%2 Aug →
mirage13–110.1011%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.1426%31 Jul →
dust210–130.1131%30 Jul →
ancient13–70.2217%30 Jul →
dust213–60.1317%30 Jul →
vertigo8–130.0126%29 Jul →
vertigo7–130.0324%29 Jul →
dust213–30.0621%29 Jul →
mirage8–5-0.0317%29 Jul →
ancient4–130.0732%27 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0519%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0634%22 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0122%21 Jul →
ancient13–00.0728%21 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0425%21 Jul →
ancient10–130.1114%20 Jul →
inferno10–130.0021%20 Jul →
dust213–30.1232%20 Jul →
mirage13–110.0019%19 Jul →
dust213–90.1230%19 Jul →
mirage10–130.0024%19 Jul →
dust213–70.0426%17 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0023%17 Jul →
ancient13–20.1323%17 Jul →
inferno13–70.1718%17 Jul →
anubis13–00.000%15 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.040%15 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0323%14 Jul →
cache13–40.0216%14 Jul →
dust212–120.0520%8 Jul →
mirage13–90.0438%3 Jul →
mirage7–130.0720%3 Jul →
inferno8–4-0.0612%2 Jul →
mirage11–50.0420%2 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0327%1 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0024%28 Jun →
mirage13–70.0414%28 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0120%27 Jun →
mirage13–90.1627%24 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.