Srecko

Srecko — CS2 Stats

RS76561199474998225[U:1:1514732497]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,441Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,434Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating13,368Blue band · top ~37% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 857 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−235Premier CS Rating · 13,603 → 13,368
0Faceit ELO · 857 → 857
+4Tracked matches · now 1,441
−10.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 22 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,368 +1,798 26 Jul18 Sept · 28 days played
10,51014,155peak 14,15526 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 857 +0 15 Sept17 Sept · 2 observations
857857peak 85715 Sept17 Sept
14,206Peak Premier in tracked matches
857Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 857
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 787 below peak (14,155)
  • +1,925 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,632 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate38.2%41.9%42.7%4.5% short
Shot accuracy3.9%12.2%11.2%7.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.980.990.09 short
Match win rate42.2%43.3%43.9%1.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSreckoFACEITLevel 3 · 857 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,368 · Blue bandPEAK ELO857csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning33
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5347Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+4 against its own average).

Aim3.6
Utility6.8
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.90 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning3.3
Utility6.8
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time581ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy12.6%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 2 Sept
26%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · office, 5 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · office, 5 Sept
13–2Biggest win · cache, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17anubisWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA23131057%-0.01
mirageB178947%-0.04
infernoS1712571%-0.01
anubisC167944%-0.03
cacheB147750%-0.02
nukeA74357%-0.04
dust241325%-0.06
office21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,499Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,017Matches
42.2%Match win rate
38.2%Headshot %
3.9%Shot accuracy
7,402MVPs
1,354Hours (in match)
3,543Bombs planted
573Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,603
P906,964
MAC-103,448
XM10142,782
AWP2,630
SG 5532,570

Lifetime map wins

5,557inferno
3,620dust2
2,425nuke
2,076vertigo
1,945office
1,174train
212italy
122cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

388Matches
48%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
68.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10350%0.8314.2
Inferno9148%0.8212.9
Mirage5836%0.7011.7
Anubis5161%0.8214.2
Train1953%0.8414.3
Vertigo1839%0.7813.7
Overpass1656%1.0216.3
Dust21338%0.6910.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
66.5%Counter-strafing
13.7°Preaim
580msReaction time
20.8%T opening success
19.9%CT opening success
0.90Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
17.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.6822° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0717% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.1025%18 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0614%18 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0111%17 Sept
anubis14–16-0.077%17 Sept
nuke13–40.0020%16 Sept
nuke13–100.0219%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0811%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.069%15 Sept
cache2–13-0.0413%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0413%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.016%13 Sept
ancient11–5-0.0116%13 Sept
nuke8–13-0.086%13 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0022%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.089%11 Sept
inferno8–130.0415%11 Sept
anubis13–100.0213%11 Sept
ancient13–100.086%11 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0713%9 Sept
cache13–90.029%8 Sept
ancient11–130.006%8 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0611%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0017%8 Sept
ancient13–9-0.016%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0311%8 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0113%7 Sept
cache10–13-0.0116%7 Sept
mirage16–130.038%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0811%7 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0113%7 Sept
inferno13–60.0315%7 Sept
cache13–9-0.0012%6 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0218%6 Sept
nuke13–9-0.017%6 Sept
anubis6–13-0.069%6 Sept
office8–13-0.0715%5 Sept
office13–100.0126%5 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0621%3 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0616%3 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0510%3 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0512%3 Sept
cache13–30.0223%3 Sept
inferno13–50.0116%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0613%2 Sept
ancient13–40.1012%2 Sept
anubis13–7-0.069%2 Sept
mirage13–80.0511%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1116%26 Aug
ancient0–5-0.080%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0111%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0812%25 Aug
ancient13–10-0.064%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.063%25 Aug
cache13–7-0.0611%25 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0810%21 Aug
inferno13–90.045%21 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0112%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0019%20 Aug
ancient10–13-0.019%19 Aug
dust213–9-0.0613%19 Aug
cache7–13-0.0912%19 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0713%19 Aug
ancient13–10-0.014%19 Aug
ancient14–16-0.049%13 Aug
anubis13–7-0.017%13 Aug
cache13–20.0511%13 Aug
anubis2–4-0.0510%13 Aug
mirage10–13-0.047%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.038%12 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0210%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.023%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0112%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.018%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0112%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.114%5 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0616%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0520%4 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0410%4 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0413%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0213%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.0415%3 Aug
cache16–12-0.038%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.058%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0115%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0619%30 Jul
inferno13–5-0.027%30 Jul
anubis0–13-0.1024%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.043%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0115%29 Jul
inferno13–60.058%29 Jul
inferno2–13-0.076%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0514%28 Jul
cache6–130.0120%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0719%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0418%26 Jul
ancient10–130.0419%26 Jul
inferno13–7-0.018%24 Jul
ancient13–80.0214%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0121%22 Jul
cache16–13-0.0410%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →