GilipteR.

GilipteR. — CS2 Stats

JM76561198067983231[U:1:107717503]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,013Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,346Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating11,287Blue band · top ~48.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,557 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,013 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,287 -6,475 13 May18 Sept · 28 days played
10,98417,762peak 17,76213 May18 Sept
18,006Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,557Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,557
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 194 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,475 below peak (17,762)
  • -985 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,572 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,713 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,658), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.6%42.7%43.8%5.2% short
Shot accuracy8.2%11.2%12.0%3.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.751.001.020.27 short
Match win rate39.0%43.9%44.7%5.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGilipteR.FACEITLevel 4 · 1,557 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,287 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,557csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4060Last 10040%Win rateLLWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time599ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy11.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 7–13 · mirage, 5 Sept
29%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 21 Jul
398msFastest reaction time · 11–5 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 20dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC30121840%-0.03
infernoS2016480%-0.01
anubisD1641225%-0.01
mirageD1541127%-0.02
cacheD61517%-0.02
dust2D5050%-0.04
nuke42250%-0.03
vertigo2020%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.02
office110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,771Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
3,447Matches
39.0%Match win rate
38.6%Headshot %
8.2%Shot accuracy
5,299MVPs
1,346Hours (in match)
1,434Bombs planted
502Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,252
AWP3,403
MP72,855
MP92,355
P902,088

Lifetime map wins

5,864inferno
2,481dust2
1,177nuke
884vertigo
516train
133office
55cbble
45italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

562Matches
49%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
74.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13251%0.8713.9
Ancient13252%0.8514.2
Mirage12349%0.9414.8
Anubis6958%0.8712.8
Dust22737%0.7613.2
Overpass2232%0.8514.3
Train1861%0.8713.3
Vertigo1450%0.7712.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
607msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
10.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.158% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.575% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.107%18 Sept
anubis11–130.0215%18 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0215%17 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0214%17 Sept
nuke13–10-0.017%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0414%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.0216%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0314%15 Sept
cache2–13-0.0210%13 Sept
mirage5–130.0018%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0411%13 Sept
ancient11–50.079%13 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0515%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0313%8 Sept
ancient11–130.0126%7 Sept
cache10–130.0313%7 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0214%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0118%7 Sept
ancient2–13-0.015%6 Sept
mirage6–13-0.070%6 Sept
mirage7–130.1213%5 Sept
inferno13–5-0.048%2 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0411%2 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0614%31 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.057%23 Aug
anubis19–22-0.048%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0611%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.064%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.0620%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0112%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0210%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.048%20 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0515%19 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0310%19 Aug
inferno19–15-0.0520%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0313%17 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0014%17 Aug
inferno16–140.0211%17 Aug
anubis13–100.039%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0813%12 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0414%12 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0511%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.019%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0511%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0320%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0214%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0210%3 Aug
cache9–130.0212%3 Aug
cache16–12-0.049%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0428%2 Aug
anubis2–13-0.075%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0012%2 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0218%1 Aug
ancient8–130.0113%1 Aug
mirage13–70.003%31 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0215%30 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0116%30 Jul
anubis0–13-0.068%30 Jul
inferno13–50.0417%26 Jul
anubis9–130.0310%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.074%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0612%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0621%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0414%21 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0029%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.029%21 Jul
ancient6–130.0219%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0212%28 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0414%20 Jun
dust29–13-0.089%16 Jun
inferno16–140.0412%7 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0410%7 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0612%6 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0416%5 Jun
ancient13–60.0115%4 Jun
inferno13–90.0122%4 Jun
dust27–13-0.0211%31 May
inferno13–4-0.0426%31 May
ancient9–13-0.047%31 May
mirage5–13-0.048%31 May
mirage16–14-0.0211%29 May
nuke11–13-0.0711%27 May
ancient9–13-0.0017%27 May
ancient2–13-0.0714%26 May
anubis13–7-0.0213%26 May
overpass8–13-0.0216%25 May
dust22–13-0.039%25 May
inferno10–130.035%24 May
anubis9–130.0017%23 May
mirage13–20.062%23 May
ancient7–13-0.056%18 May
anubis17–19-0.0020%17 May
ancient10–13-0.0217%15 May
ancient9–13-0.078%14 May
ancient13–11-0.0610%14 May
inferno13–8-0.0010%14 May
nuke9–130.0115%13 May
inferno13–40.0013%13 May
ancient5–13-0.0314%13 May
office13–90.0012%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →