drghbfUIOPJÅØHSGFJI0OSDØØÆF

drghbfUIOPJÅØHSGFJI0OSDØØÆF — CS2 Stats

76561199417978722[U:1:1457712994]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,687Tracked matches33%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,039 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,687 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 3 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

3,039Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2025-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,039
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 461 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-09-07
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdrghbfUIOPJÅØHSGFJI0OSDØØ…FACEITLevel 10 · 3,039 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,039csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning63
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4357Last 10043%Win rateLLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −109ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility1.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.3
Utility1.7
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time556ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–4 · train, 9 Sept
57%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · vertigo, 12 Dec
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 12 Dec
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
149In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB22101245%-0.00
nukeC1661038%0.01
overpassA138562%0.01
trainS128467%0.03
cache_bC83538%-0.03
infernoB63350%-0.00
anubisD6060%-0.02
mirageD61517%-0.02
office41325%0.02
vertigo31233%0.00
dust221150%-0.02
rooftop1010%-0.12
agency110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
559msReaction time
53.3%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
2.51HE damage / grenade
2.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2911 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–130.000%31 Mar
anubis13–160.0138%6 Feb
cache_b12–160.0244%5 Feb
nuke16–13-0.0225%30 Jan
overpass13–60.1225%14 Jan
train19–170.0242%14 Jan
ancient13–90.0028%4 Jan
cache_b13–110.0739%29 Dec
cache_b7–13-0.0332%29 Dec
train6–13-0.100%27 Dec
nuke4–13-0.1110%27 Dec
vertigo13–110.0639%17 Dec
cache_b11–13-0.0724%13 Dec
office0–8-0.046%12 Dec
cache_b5–13-0.1418%12 Dec
dust26–13-0.0615%12 Dec
vertigo3–13-0.0125%12 Dec
overpass2–6-0.1120%12 Dec
cache_b0–8-0.0925%12 Dec
vertigo0–8-0.0557%12 Dec
rooftop2–9-0.1231%12 Dec
cache_b13–110.0424%12 Dec
ancient9–130.0334%12 Dec
anubis6–130.0413%11 Dec
mirage7–130.0023%11 Dec
cache_b13–6-0.0117%11 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0231%11 Dec
office8–130.0739%28 Nov
office5–130.0534%26 Nov
mirage13–100.0441%1 Nov
train13–60.0529%30 Oct
train10–13-0.0628%21 Oct
inferno3–130.0430%17 Oct
overpass13–11-0.0441%12 Oct
nuke12–16-0.0618%11 Oct
ancient16–140.0230%11 Oct
train13–8-0.0137%10 Oct
inferno13–90.0529%10 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0631%9 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0527%8 Oct
ancient16–13-0.0339%3 Oct
ancient16–140.0224%27 Sept
train13–100.0235%27 Sept
overpass8–130.0226%20 Sept
overpass13–110.0224%20 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0423%19 Sept
ancient13–100.0432%18 Sept
overpass11–130.0330%13 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0456%9 Sept
nuke13–50.0622%9 Sept
train13–40.2333%9 Sept
ancient13–100.0020%8 Sept
mirage2–6-0.0529%8 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0230%7 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0427%5 Sept
train13–70.0337%5 Sept
overpass13–8-0.0126%5 Sept
dust213–100.0231%2 Sept
ancient16–19-0.0229%31 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0630%31 Aug
nuke2–130.0024%31 Aug
nuke13–50.0520%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0528%31 Aug
nuke7–130.0329%31 Aug
overpass14–160.0027%31 Aug
nuke16–140.0427%31 Aug
train10–130.0323%31 Aug
overpass5–130.0227%31 Aug
ancient13–90.0020%31 Aug
ancient6–130.0520%28 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0221%27 Aug
nuke7–130.0518%27 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0226%27 Aug
overpass13–70.0725%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0218%21 Aug
nuke7–130.0124%18 Aug
train13–50.0430%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0616%18 Aug
office13–9-0.0117%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0116%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0031%9 Aug
agency13–110.1026%7 Aug
overpass13–30.0023%23 Jul
nuke13–60.1320%23 Jul
overpass16–12-0.0621%21 Jul
overpass13–50.0620%17 Jul
nuke13–30.0321%17 Jul
train11–130.0827%16 Jul
train13–30.0613%12 Jul
ancient10–130.029%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0234%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0022%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0321%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0721%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0935%6 Jul
ancient10–130.0220%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0128%5 Jul
nuke17–190.0424%3 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0832%3 Jul
ancient13–110.0325%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →