saku.

saku. — CS2 Stats

DE76561199402012393[U:1:1441746665]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,039Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,798Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85258 of 259360 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 -1,661 23 Aug – 25 Oct · 28 days played
19,62423,069peak 23,06923 Aug25 Oct
23,519Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,070 below peak (23,069)
  • -1,714 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate49.7%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.8%12.4%12.7%9.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.031.05above
Match win rate48.1%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaku.FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning46
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateWWLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time485ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 485ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 2 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · cache, 19 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3115–1648%0.01
ancientA1710–759%0.01
nukeC145–936%-0.01
dust2C114–736%0.01
cacheA85–363%0.02
mirageA85–363%0.02
anubisA74–357%0.06
vertigo—21–150%0.03
office—10–10%0.07
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,869Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,315Matches
48.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
49.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2.8%Shot accuracy
5,553MVPs
930Hours (in match)
3,226Bombs planted
617Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,211inferno
3,651dust2
2,415nuke
1,284vertigo
271office
157train
31cbble
17italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

204Matches
52%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
81.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4757%1.2316.7
Dust23342%1.0014.5
Inferno2959%1.2516.7
Anubis1856%1.2516.2
Ancient1464%1.1617.6
Nuke1377%1.4616.0
Vertigo1250%1.0314.0
Cache30%1.1023.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
484msReaction time
23.7%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
8.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.6577% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0021%25 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0431%25 Oct →
inferno12–160.0829%7 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.020%7 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0215%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.1214%4 Oct →
dust26–130.0224%4 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0714%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0024%30 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.028%30 Sept →
cache3–130.0323%27 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0131%27 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0922%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.098%26 Sept →
dust211–130.0218%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0414%25 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0122%24 Sept →
dust213–10.0230%24 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0324%24 Sept →
cache13–20.0513%24 Sept →
inferno13–10.0623%24 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.067%24 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0119%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.0719%23 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0316%23 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0030%23 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0318%23 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.048%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0116%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.029%21 Sept →
anubis13–160.0322%21 Sept →
anubis11–130.0516%21 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0123%21 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0423%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.0432%19 Sept →
inferno13–30.0724%19 Sept →
ancient16–140.0027%19 Sept →
office4–130.0738%19 Sept →
dust213–80.1435%19 Sept →
cache13–20.0754%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0417%18 Sept →
anubis9–130.0120%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.1521%17 Sept →
ancient13–80.1116%17 Sept →
mirage12–120.0828%17 Sept →
nuke10–130.0119%13 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0319%13 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0018%13 Sept →
dust213–30.0335%12 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0913%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0232%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.1113%5 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0937%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0614%5 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0821%5 Sept →
train12–12-0.0417%5 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.0725%5 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0113%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0616%5 Sept →
cache13–30.0123%5 Sept →
inferno13–00.0931%5 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0311%5 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0610%5 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0719%2 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0320%2 Sept →
mirage8–130.0019%2 Sept →
cache7–130.0530%2 Sept →
mirage16–140.0822%2 Sept →
inferno0–130.0240%2 Sept →
inferno9–50.1713%2 Sept →
inferno8–80.0325%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0619%1 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0323%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0616%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.0723%31 Aug →
ancient13–80.0319%31 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0026%31 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0412%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.0211%31 Aug →
nuke13–90.0128%31 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0221%31 Aug →
ancient13–40.0813%30 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0316%28 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0120%28 Aug →
inferno15–150.1026%28 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.009%27 Aug →
inferno10–130.048%27 Aug →
nuke8–130.0320%27 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0210%27 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0611%26 Aug →
nuke13–70.0419%25 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0229%25 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0320%24 Aug →
inferno13–50.0518%24 Aug →
anubis13–20.0718%24 Aug →
nuke13–100.0022%24 Aug →
nuke5–130.1225%24 Aug →
inferno13–60.0332%23 Aug →
ancient8–130.1316%23 Aug →
mirage13–30.1237%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.