๐•ฏ๐–Š๐–“๐–“๐–ž๐–ž๐–ž<3

๐•ฏ๐–Š๐–“๐–“๐–ž๐–ž๐–ž<3 โ€” CS2 Stats

JP76561199385106912[U:1:1424841184]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

643Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,065Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation โ€” history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate32.6%43.8%44.8%12.2% short
Shot accuracy6.1%12.0%12.4%6.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.251.021.04above
Match win rate50.8%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐•ฏ๐–Š๐–“๐–“๐–ž๐–ž๐–ž<3FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning69
Utility29

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40โ€“44โ€“16Last 10040%Win rateLLWWTTTLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท +3.4pp headshot accuracy ยท +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2โ€“2โ€“1 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“3โ€“4 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 8โ€“6โ€“6 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility2.9
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.9
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02โˆ’0.02
first โ…“ avg 0.04 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.02
Reaction time620ms+41ms
first โ…“ avg 578ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%โˆ’4.9%
first โ…“ avg 22.3% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating ยท 9โ€“0 ยท nuke, 10 Aug โ†’
100%Best headshot accuracy ยท 8โ€“3 ยท dust2, 19 Aug โ†’
359msFastest reaction time ยท 9โ€“7 ยท inferno, 5 Sept โ†’
13โ€“4Biggest win ยท dust2, 6 Sept โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 88% over 8infernoWeakest map ยท 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC4418โ€“2641%0.05
infernoD227โ€“1532%0.00
poseidonC114โ€“736%-0.02
dust2S87โ€“188%0.04
mirageโ€”42โ€“250%0.08
vertigoโ€”31โ€“233%0.01
anubisโ€”30โ€“30%-0.01
ancientโ€”21โ€“150%-0.02
cacheโ€”20โ€“20%0.03
eldoradoโ€”10โ€“10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

178,800Lifetime kills
1.25K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 5 players
6,294Matches
50.8%Match win rate ยท Top 10% of Level 5 players
32.6%Headshot %
6.1%Shot accuracy
43,898MVPs
3,992Hours (in match)
2,450Bombs planted
1,266Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP91,029
AK-4744,387
Knife4,969
MP92,246
SSG 081,867
MAC-101,493

Lifetime map wins

5,095nuke
5,062vertigo
4,350dust2
4,139inferno
485lake
445cbble
438train
58office

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

68Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
90.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21656%1.2318.8
Mirage1567%1.3222.6
Inferno1155%1.0713.7
Nuke838%1.1118.3
Anubis825%1.0618.9
Ancient667%1.2819.3
Vertigo20%0.7013.5
Cache10%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
43.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.0ยฐPreaim
563msReaction time
45.4%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.14HE damage / grenade
3.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4886 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2โ€“9-0.1014%15 Sept โ†’
poseidon4โ€“9-0.0936%15 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“30.0915%15 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“30.1616%11 Sept โ†’
poseidon8โ€“80.0213%11 Sept โ†’
poseidon8โ€“80.0226%11 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“8-0.0217%11 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“9-0.1020%11 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.079%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“20.2918%11 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“9-0.0322%11 Sept โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.018%11 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0113%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“70.0328%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“70.0422%11 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0017%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“50.0812%11 Sept โ†’
nuke4โ€“90.0310%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“40.1210%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“4-0.029%11 Sept โ†’
nuke6โ€“9-0.0214%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“20.1743%11 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“30.116%11 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0317%6 Sept โ†’
ancient4โ€“13-0.0617%6 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“40.1122%6 Sept โ†’
poseidon5โ€“9-0.086%6 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“40.0518%6 Sept โ†’
nuke12โ€“50.0612%6 Sept โ†’
poseidon8โ€“8-0.0929%5 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“40.0430%5 Sept โ†’
poseidon2โ€“9-0.2117%5 Sept โ†’
nuke6โ€“9-0.079%5 Sept โ†’
nuke6โ€“90.0132%5 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“10.2821%5 Sept โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.0631%5 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0513%5 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.1217%5 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0010%5 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0717%5 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0118%5 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“90.0025%4 Sept โ†’
inferno0โ€“9-0.240%4 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.0914%4 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0140%4 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.1010%4 Sept โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.099%4 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0924%4 Sept โ†’
nuke4โ€“9-0.1718%4 Sept โ†’
nuke3โ€“9-0.0528%29 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.1025%29 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“9-0.0019%29 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“9-0.0220%29 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0317%29 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“7-0.0138%29 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0717%29 Aug โ†’
nuke4โ€“130.0326%28 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“20.2445%23 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“60.0833%23 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“00.2157%23 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“00.1713%23 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.0230%22 Aug โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.1417%22 Aug โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.0912%22 Aug โ†’
vertigo9โ€“50.0526%22 Aug โ†’
vertigo5โ€“9-0.0343%22 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“6-0.0219%22 Aug โ†’
vertigo6โ€“130.0223%21 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0115%21 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0311%20 Aug โ†’
nuke5โ€“130.0313%20 Aug โ†’
dust28โ€“30.06100%19 Aug โ†’
cache12โ€“120.0564%19 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.1214%19 Aug โ†’
inferno12โ€“120.1146%19 Aug โ†’
poseidon1โ€“9-0.1127%17 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.1018%17 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“50.1222%17 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.1025%17 Aug โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0114%16 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0412%16 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0014%16 Aug โ†’
eldorado5โ€“9-0.0814%16 Aug โ†’
inferno6โ€“90.0221%16 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0122%16 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“90.0123%16 Aug โ†’
nuke3โ€“9-0.107%16 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“00.1115%16 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“70.1424%16 Aug โ†’
dust22โ€“13-0.0612%15 Aug โ†’
anubis10โ€“130.0216%15 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“130.0213%14 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0133%14 Aug โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0026%14 Aug โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0311%14 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.0819%10 Aug โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.0514%10 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.0515%10 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“00.4021%10 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.0212%10 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’