scan, pakk og betal

scan, pakk og betal — CS2 Stats

NO76561199384516377[U:1:1424250649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,490Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
8,143Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=27,874), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate65.2%51.0%
Shot accuracy9.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.901.09
Match win rate55.3%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGscan, pakk og betalFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning52
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5446Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility7.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.2
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time552ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · train, 10 Mar
44%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · nuke, 25 Apr
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 14 Dec
13–1Biggest win · train, 10 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1015In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 21nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA27151256%-0.01
ancientB22111150%0.01
mirageA2113862%0.02
dust2B147750%-0.00
vertigoB63350%-0.01
nukeD51420%-0.03
inferno32167%0.01
train110100%0.11
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

136,332Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,403Matches
55.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
65.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 10 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
13,932MVPs
8,143Hours (in match)
2,872Bombs planted
2,011Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,749
AWP7,849
MP93,793
Knife2,646
MAC-101,559

Lifetime map wins

5,176vertigo
3,655inferno
2,639nuke
2,441dust2
576train
5cbble
2ar_monastery
2stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,231Matches
54%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
85.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient56656%1.1717.3
Anubis47755%1.1616.5
Mirage44749%1.1116.6
Vertigo15049%1.0916.8
Dust213943%1.0515.7
Nuke5961%1.0815.4
Inferno3757%1.2017.5
Overpass3661%1.1817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
552msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
11.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.1486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0120%17 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0538%12 Mar
inferno13–100.0724%10 Mar
dust213–30.0918%10 Mar
train13–10.1125%10 Mar
anubis13–110.0618%1 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0122%28 Feb
dust210–12-0.0526%1 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0329%1 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0117%16 Jan
mirage13–20.0827%5 Jan
ancient13–10.1110%28 Dec
anubis10–12-0.0422%28 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0626%27 Dec
ancient13–60.0418%26 Dec
dust211–13-0.0222%24 Dec
anubis3–13-0.0328%19 Dec
anubis10–130.0234%14 Dec
dust213–6-0.0219%14 Dec
ancient13–40.0722%8 Dec
mirage13–40.1126%7 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0625%7 Dec
dust25–13-0.0224%7 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0214%4 Dec
ancient13–4-0.0316%4 Dec
anubis13–90.0115%4 Dec
anubis7–130.0010%2 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0218%2 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0121%2 Dec
ancient2–13-0.0416%9 Nov
anubis13–11-0.0213%5 Nov
anubis13–9-0.0224%29 Oct
mirage13–80.0628%27 Oct
ancient9–13-0.0021%27 Oct
ancient16–14-0.0012%22 Oct
ancient13–100.0525%6 Oct
ancient13–80.0522%7 Sept
ancient13–30.0429%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0122%1 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0323%1 Sept
dust24–130.0136%27 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0615%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0316%21 Aug
anubis13–40.0234%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0118%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0127%14 Aug
anubis13–110.0523%11 Aug
nuke16–120.0224%5 Aug
dust213–4-0.0327%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0933%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0530%26 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0811%26 Jul
ancient14–160.0623%22 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0220%21 Jul
anubis13–10.0521%1 Jul
anubis13–80.0413%8 Jun
anubis13–20.0316%26 May
dust213–90.1020%12 May
mirage13–11-0.0130%6 May
dust213–11-0.0125%5 May
dust216–13-0.0118%5 May
vertigo8–13-0.0722%4 May
mirage0–13-0.0711%4 May
ancient14–16-0.0221%4 May
mirage11–130.0517%2 May
ancient13–80.0816%2 May
mirage13–80.0325%2 May
dust25–13-0.0242%2 May
anubis16–140.0429%30 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0517%29 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0633%29 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0325%29 Apr
ancient13–90.0718%28 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0032%27 Apr
dust213–80.0124%27 Apr
mirage13–20.0519%27 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0115%26 Apr
nuke10–130.0044%25 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.0223%24 Apr
overpass13–60.0522%24 Apr
vertigo13–60.0725%23 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0121%23 Apr
mirage13–20.0732%21 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0113%21 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0715%20 Apr
mirage13–50.0129%20 Apr
mirage10–130.0234%20 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0821%20 Apr
vertigo13–80.0125%18 Apr
vertigo9–13-0.0226%18 Apr
mirage13–100.0518%16 Apr
anubis13–40.0611%14 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0525%14 Apr
mirage10–130.0030%14 Apr
vertigo11–130.0117%14 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0218%13 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0619%13 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0310%13 Apr
mirage13–110.0521%12 Apr
ancient13–80.0432%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →