hagmeister

hagmeister — CS2 Stats

76561198069618928[U:1:109353200]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,088Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,088 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 26 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

51Days played since 2024-02-26

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhagmeisterFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5842Last 10058%Win rateLLLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 317 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time531ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy27.0%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–3 · train, 14 Nov
73%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · train, 9 Jan
344msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 21 May
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 1 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 22nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA26161062%0.02
anubisS2217577%0.02
mirageA2113862%0.02
infernoA95456%0.00
overpassC73443%-0.01
nukeD71614%-0.01
trainC52340%0.08
dust231233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,862Matches
53%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
85.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient25557%1.2816.5
Anubis19766%1.2116.6
Mirage11156%1.2016.7
Overpass6557%1.3517.2
Nuke5141%1.1216.8
Dust24048%1.1215.6
Inferno3868%1.3115.9
Vertigo1741%1.1016.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
526msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
6.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3414% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–16-0.0820%25 Jan
mirage3–130.0125%25 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0320%14 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0239%14 Jan
dust25–13-0.0827%13 Jan
inferno13–70.0132%13 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0132%12 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0144%12 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0725%12 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0723%11 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0123%11 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0024%21 Nov
dust213–7-0.0137%21 Nov
overpass3–13-0.0630%21 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0038%7 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0038%7 Nov
mirage1–13-0.0123%7 Nov
mirage1–13-0.0123%7 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0323%7 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0323%7 Nov
ancient13–30.0410%7 Nov
ancient13–30.0410%7 Nov
overpass13–8-0.0336%7 Nov
overpass13–8-0.0336%7 Nov
inferno13–80.0234%4 Nov
inferno13–110.0529%31 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0215%26 Aug
train8–130.0324%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0736%8 Jun
inferno16–120.1029%31 May
anubis16–140.0121%31 May
nuke3–13-0.0515%22 Apr
ancient13–100.0026%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0938%4 Mar
mirage19–150.0341%3 Mar
mirage13–60.0137%28 Feb
train8–130.0133%8 Feb
ancient13–40.0741%8 Feb
train13–60.0647%7 Feb
mirage13–50.0629%7 Feb
anubis13–80.0024%16 Jan
train7–130.0673%9 Jan
ancient13–40.0321%8 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0218%7 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0917%7 Dec
dust25–130.0139%7 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0113%4 Dec
ancient13–4-0.0024%4 Dec
anubis13–90.0318%4 Dec
anubis7–13-0.0930%2 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0316%2 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0131%2 Dec
train13–30.2343%14 Nov
ancient2–13-0.0615%9 Nov
mirage13–60.0533%9 Nov
anubis13–11-0.0126%5 Nov
anubis13–90.0627%29 Oct
ancient16–140.0119%22 Oct
anubis13–50.0711%14 Oct
ancient10–130.0822%13 Oct
mirage13–80.0520%13 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0131%13 Oct
mirage13–70.1225%2 Oct
ancient13–60.1325%2 Oct
ancient19–170.0528%5 Sept
anubis13–40.0138%19 Aug
nuke16–120.0323%5 Aug
anubis13–10.0510%1 Jul
anubis34–300.0627%25 May
anubis6–13-0.0412%21 May
anubis19–220.0135%21 May
mirage6–13-0.0532%6 May
ancient3–13-0.0828%17 Apr
ancient13–10.0752%17 Apr
overpass13–30.0927%17 Apr
mirage13–80.0110%4 Apr
ancient13–110.0022%9 Mar
anubis13–30.0240%7 Mar
overpass7–130.0525%7 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0315%7 Mar
ancient13–60.1112%7 Mar
ancient13–50.0416%7 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0516%6 Mar
anubis19–170.0021%5 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0611%5 Mar
ancient13–100.0332%5 Mar
anubis16–14-0.0213%4 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0426%4 Mar
ancient13–20.0914%4 Mar
mirage13–100.0324%1 Mar
mirage13–100.0537%1 Mar
anubis13–100.0634%1 Mar
anubis13–50.0536%1 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0535%1 Mar
nuke11–130.0321%1 Mar
mirage13–10.1432%29 Feb
ancient13–100.0323%29 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0312%29 Feb
anubis13–20.1116%29 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0128%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →