snoobi

snoobi — CS2 Stats

UZ76561199374999490[U:1:1414733762]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

227Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
138Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,204Purple band · top ~19.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 227 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 14 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,204 +486 14 Jun16 Sept · 19 days played
16,71819,833peak 19,83314 Jun16 Sept
19,953Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-06-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,629 below peak (19,833)
  • +96 over 30 days · steady
  • -912 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,796 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,214), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate82.0%44.3%47.0%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.8%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio2.581.031.08above
Match win rate43.8%45.2%46.7%2.9% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnoobiPREMIER17,204 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning44
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 697ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time615ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–0 · cache, 3 Jul
51%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 1 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 16 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 17 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29181162%0.01
mirageC23101343%0.00
nukeD1551033%-0.01
cacheA116555%0.04
ancientB84450%0.02
infernoS75271%-0.01
overpass41325%0.00
anubis330100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,034Lifetime kills
2.58K/D · Top 1% of Purple band
336Matches
43.8%Match win rate
82.0%Headshot % · Top 1% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
649MVPs
138Hours (in match)
428Bombs planted
188Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

876dust2
367nuke
356inferno
44train
22office
13vertigo
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
56%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
85.4ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage580%1.1014.8
Inferno367%0.8812.7
Dust2250%1.0015.5
Ancient250%1.4929.0
Overpass20%1.0416.5
Train1100%1.2918.0
Nuke10%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
606msReaction time
20.4%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.59HE damage / grenade
4.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3534% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0126%30 Aug
dust210–1-0.0112%30 Aug
inferno16–140.0222%30 Aug
dust27–130.0629%29 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0428%29 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0420%29 Aug
dust215–15-0.0214%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0126%29 Aug
cache7–130.0213%29 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0719%29 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0520%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.0242%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0027%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0314%23 Aug
ancient13–40.0319%23 Aug
nuke9–130.0023%23 Aug
cache16–140.0227%23 Aug
dust213–100.0129%23 Aug
cache13–160.025%16 Aug
dust213–80.078%16 Aug
dust213–40.0625%16 Aug
dust213–4-0.0219%16 Aug
dust213–110.0114%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0521%9 Aug
dust213–16-0.0718%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.0224%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0416%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0924%8 Aug
nuke11–13-0.109%8 Aug
mirage5–130.0320%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0451%1 Aug
cache16–130.0021%1 Aug
dust216–14-0.0122%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0539%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0221%31 Jul
nuke11–130.0422%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0531%3 Jul
dust213–60.0720%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.0428%3 Jul
cache13–40.0327%3 Jul
cache9–00.3028%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0216%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0216%2 Jul
mirage4–130.0227%2 Jul
cache13–80.1131%28 Jun
dust23–130.0223%28 Jun
cache9–130.0320%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0124%27 Jun
dust29–130.0216%27 Jun
overpass2–130.0529%27 Jun
nuke13–90.0315%27 Jun
ancient6–130.0635%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0422%27 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0028%27 Jun
dust213–70.0924%27 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0219%27 Jun
nuke13–110.0227%26 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0314%26 Jun
dust213–80.0539%26 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0515%26 Jun
dust213–6-0.0320%26 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0122%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0021%26 Jun
ancient13–50.0912%26 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0119%25 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0136%24 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0532%21 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0423%21 Jun
anubis16–130.0022%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0527%21 Jun
dust213–10-0.0250%21 Jun
ancient13–70.0327%21 Jun
mirage11–130.0324%21 Jun
dust213–7-0.0125%21 Jun
dust213–60.1128%21 Jun
dust27–130.0124%21 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0429%21 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0212%20 Jun
mirage5–130.000%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0026%20 Jun
inferno13–30.0639%20 Jun
ancient10–130.0130%20 Jun
mirage13–100.0143%20 Jun
nuke13–7-0.055%20 Jun
ancient7–13-0.029%20 Jun
mirage13–100.0222%20 Jun
overpass9–130.0234%20 Jun
dust213–80.0014%20 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0022%20 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0327%17 Jun
mirage13–20.0824%17 Jun
anubis13–90.0624%17 Jun
nuke13–40.0123%17 Jun
dust213–11-0.0225%17 Jun
anubis13–60.0340%17 Jun
dust210–130.0324%16 Jun
dust213–100.0219%16 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0125%16 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0517%14 Jun
dust28–130.0323%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →