๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿทtobbs

๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐Ÿทtobbs โ€” CS2 Stats

SE76561199300550696[U:1:1340284968]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

2,534Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,225Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating13,739Blue band ยท top ~35.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Jul 2026 (126 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,739 -3,358 20 Feb โ€“ 1 Jul ยท 37 days played
13,73918,207peak 18,20720 Feb1 Jul
18,207Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-02-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,468 below peak (18,207)
  • -3,897 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 1,261 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate51.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy4.6%12.7%13.0%8.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.051.060.15 short
Match win rate48.6%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐Ÿ—ฟโƒคโƒข๐ŸทtobbsFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER13,739 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning56
Utility73

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44โ€“51โ€“5Last 10044%Win rateWWLLWLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท +5.2pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’80ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“6โ€“1 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 6โ€“13โ€“1 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist โ€” Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility7.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 22% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 692ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.6
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02โˆ’0.00
first โ…“ avg -0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.02
Reaction time687msโˆ’41ms
first โ…“ avg 728ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 687ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+0.8%
first โ…“ avg 19.5% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating ยท 13โ€“8 ยท dust2, 5 Mar โ†’
47%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“6 ยท mirage, 23 Feb โ†’
398msFastest reaction time ยท 3โ€“13 ยท dust2, 7 May โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท anubis, 1 May โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6โ€“4In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 52% over 21overpassWeakest map ยท 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC218โ€“1338%-0.02
dust2B2111โ€“1052%-0.01
anubisC167โ€“944%-0.01
mirageC125โ€“742%-0.03
nukeB115โ€“645%-0.01
overpassC114โ€“736%-0.04
cacheC52โ€“340%-0.02
infernoโ€”32โ€“167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,176Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
3,038Matches
48.6%Match win rate ยท Top 25% of Level 7 players
51.7%Headshot % ยท Top 25% of Level 7 players
4.6%Shot accuracy
5,320MVPs
1,225Hours (in match)
3,861Bombs planted
747Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,767nuke
3,453dust2
3,222vertigo
2,895inferno
306train
8cbble
1office

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches
56%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
67.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4347%0.9813.9
Vertigo2955%0.8712.3
Anubis2273%1.1016.3
Nuke1861%1.5813.7
Ancient1443%0.9313.8
Inferno1258%1.0214.3
Overpass367%1.0314.0
Dust2333%1.0915.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
11.6ยฐPreaim
692msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
15.7%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.6691% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy โ†’Overpass grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13โ€“9-0.0314%1 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0321%23 May โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0236%23 May โ†’
overpass8โ€“13-0.0321%13 May โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0320%13 May โ†’
cache8โ€“130.0112%8 May โ†’
ancient4โ€“13-0.0521%8 May โ†’
dust23โ€“130.0133%7 May โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0524%7 May โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0924%7 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“10.0624%1 May โ†’
cache13โ€“8-0.0016%1 May โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0714%29 Apr โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0413%24 Apr โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0313%24 Apr โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0022%10 Apr โ†’
dust216โ€“13-0.0414%10 Apr โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0417%10 Apr โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0419%7 Apr โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0522%7 Apr โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0615%7 Apr โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0425%3 Apr โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0618%2 Apr โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0432%2 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0329%28 Mar โ†’
dust25โ€“130.0228%28 Mar โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0824%28 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“7-0.0113%28 Mar โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.0011%28 Mar โ†’
dust215โ€“150.0022%27 Mar โ†’
dust22โ€“13-0.0524%27 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0314%27 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0517%27 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“7-0.0314%26 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0319%26 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0127%24 Mar โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0214%24 Mar โ†’
overpass6โ€“13-0.0323%24 Mar โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0416%21 Mar โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0019%21 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0118%21 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0219%19 Mar โ†’
anubis3โ€“130.0332%19 Mar โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0623%18 Mar โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0412%18 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0317%18 Mar โ†’
dust216โ€“140.0122%16 Mar โ†’
anubis14โ€“160.0011%16 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0023%16 Mar โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0119%14 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“50.0219%14 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0021%14 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0112%14 Mar โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0526%13 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0344%13 Mar โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0027%13 Mar โ†’
overpass5โ€“13-0.1417%13 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0122%13 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0214%12 Mar โ†’
overpass9โ€“13-0.0522%12 Mar โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0315%11 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0316%11 Mar โ†’
overpass8โ€“13-0.087%10 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“6-0.0122%10 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“4-0.0628%10 Mar โ†’
dust214โ€“16-0.0024%9 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0219%9 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“30.0716%9 Mar โ†’
ancient4โ€“130.0423%6 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0528%6 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0228%5 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0825%5 Mar โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.0615%5 Mar โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0717%1 Mar โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0231%1 Mar โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0321%28 Feb โ†’
ancient1โ€“13-0.0420%28 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“20.0014%28 Feb โ†’
anubis14โ€“16-0.0425%27 Feb โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0721%27 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“160.0116%27 Feb โ†’
overpass15โ€“15-0.0225%27 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0221%26 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0014%26 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0619%25 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.0837%25 Feb โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0517%25 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“2-0.0419%24 Feb โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0611%24 Feb โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0414%23 Feb โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.088%23 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0747%23 Feb โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.048%22 Feb โ†’
overpass13โ€“6-0.0111%22 Feb โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0115%21 Feb โ†’
overpass13โ€“3-0.0516%21 Feb โ†’
ancient15โ€“150.0519%21 Feb โ†’
dust212โ€“16-0.0313%20 Feb โ†’
overpass7โ€“13-0.0714%20 Feb โ†’
ancient9โ€“13-0.0715%20 Feb โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.