اللَّهُ أَكْبَرُ

اللَّهُ أَكْبَرُ — CS2 Stats

NE76561199274731343[U:1:1314465615]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,353Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,100Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,730Purple band · top ~21.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 16,730 → 16,730
0Faceit ELO · 1,458 → 1,458
+7Tracked matches · now 1,353
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,730 +3,288 15 May – 29 Oct · 21 days played
13,44218,951peak 18,95115 May29 Oct
18,951Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,458Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-03-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,458
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-10-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,221 below peak (18,951)
  • +531 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,270 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.3%45.7%46.8%6.5% short
Shot accuracy5.9%12.7%13.0%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.051.06above
Match win rate48.3%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGاللَّهُ أَكْبَرُFACEITLevel 7 · 1,458 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,730 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,458csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning73
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateWLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.1pp headshot accuracy · +87ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.0
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 50% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.3
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time525ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 6–0 · warden, 17 Mar →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · mirage, 27 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
2–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 68% over 22mirageWeakest map · 13% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2215–768%0.06
mirageD152–1313%0.04
ancientC125–742%0.03
infernoD124–833%0.08
cacheD112–918%0.01
dust2B105–550%0.04
office—42–250%0.03
vertigo—42–250%0.03
nuke—31–233%0.07
fachwerk—30–30%0.04
warden—22–0100%0.15
shelter—11–0100%0.05
italy—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,016Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3,001Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
40.3%Headshot %
5.9%Shot accuracy
9,158MVPs
1,313Hours (in match)
5,018Bombs planted
849Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,671
AWP6,071
Molotov5,699
FAMAS1,925
MP91,811
MAC-101,708

Lifetime map wins

5,182dust2
3,550inferno
3,045vertigo
2,255nuke
742train
235office
147italy
133cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

943Matches
49%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
90.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis18848%1.2318.6
Dust217547%1.2017.8
Ancient17150%1.2718.5
Mirage13651%1.1216.5
Inferno6746%1.1016.5
Vertigo4652%1.4420.5
Nuke3355%1.2916.9
Train1759%1.2715.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
528msReaction time
72.0%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.16HE damage / grenade
18.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0624%30 Oct →
mirage11–130.0918%30 Oct →
office13–100.0827%29 Oct →
office8–130.0118%29 Oct →
dust213–30.068%29 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0112%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0529%24 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.017%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0323%24 Oct →
office13–40.0140%23 Oct →
shelter13–90.0517%22 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0111%18 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0612%14 Oct →
ancient10–130.0818%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.0820%14 Oct →
ancient11–130.0420%13 Oct →
mirage0–2-0.000%13 Oct →
inferno11–130.0315%5 Oct →
mirage11–130.0310%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.0221%2 Oct →
anubis13–70.057%30 Sept →
anubis13–90.0428%30 Sept →
cache6–130.0117%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.1115%28 Sept →
mirage11–130.0614%27 Sept →
fachwerk2–100.0524%26 Sept →
ancient13–50.1019%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0916%23 Sept →
anubis13–90.0519%21 Sept →
inferno13–100.1321%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0717%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0718%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0315%7 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0522%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0528%4 Sept →
anubis8–130.0020%3 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0112%3 Sept →
cache9–130.0018%2 Sept →
inferno9–130.0926%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.1222%2 Sept →
inferno5–130.1417%1 Sept →
dust211–130.018%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.1017%1 Sept →
cache3–130.0119%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0722%30 Aug →
anubis13–60.0513%30 Aug →
cache13–70.0513%30 Aug →
anubis13–40.0717%30 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.0114%29 Aug →
mirage5–130.0216%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0815%28 Aug →
inferno10–130.0116%26 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0023%26 Aug →
anubis13–20.1515%26 Aug →
mirage13–70.0516%31 Jul →
fachwerk7–130.0136%31 Jul →
mirage0–20.1275%27 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0010%26 Jul →
mirage10–130.0815%26 Jul →
vertigo13–50.1218%25 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0331%24 Jul →
anubis13–100.1022%24 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.047%22 Jul →
dust213–80.0823%22 Jul →
dust23–130.0619%17 Jul →
fachwerk12–120.0619%9 Jul →
anubis13–100.019%24 Jun →
cache3–10-0.0619%17 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0114%15 Jun →
inferno11–130.2216%15 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0113%4 Jun →
warden13–6-0.090%4 Jun →
italy13–60.0217%3 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0010%23 May →
ancient11–130.0417%22 May →
anubis14–160.0016%22 May →
anubis13–30.0920%16 May →
mirage5–130.0125%15 May →
inferno8–130.1518%11 May →
anubis13–90.0612%5 May →
cache6–130.0310%5 May →
anubis3–130.0713%2 May →
mirage3–11-0.0725%2 May →
cache8–13-0.067%2 May →
cache7–130.0212%29 Apr →
dust213–50.1322%26 Apr →
ancient10–130.1021%22 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0715%19 Apr →
mirage1–130.0213%19 Apr →
mirage13–70.0814%4 Apr →
vertigo5–13-0.0115%23 Mar →
office12–120.0315%22 Mar →
anubis13–20.1413%22 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0218%19 Mar →
mirage5–130.0714%19 Mar →
dust26–130.1020%19 Mar →
nuke9–130.1019%18 Mar →
warden6–00.3922%17 Mar →
anubis13–40.0619%17 Mar →
anubis12–120.0715%16 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.