N1el$

N1el$ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199238435465[U:1:1278169737]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,292Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,413Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,394Purple band · top ~26.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,394 +3,296 17 Jun – 22 Oct · 23 days played
11,25517,089peak 17,08917 Jun22 Oct
17,099Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-06-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,695 below peak (17,089)
  • -244 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,392 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,606 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.9%43.8%44.8%3.9% short
Shot accuracy4.8%12.0%12.4%7.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.021.03meets
Match win rate44.9%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGN1el$FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,394 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time609ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 17 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 30 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 30 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 4 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2213–959%-0.00
infernoB2111–1052%0.00
nukeB189–950%-0.02
mirageA138–562%0.02
cacheS128–467%0.01
anubisD72–529%0.00
dust2D50–50%0.00
poseidon—11–0100%-0.13
overpass—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,793Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1,835Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
40.9%Headshot %
4.8%Shot accuracy
3,949MVPs
762Hours (in match)
2,641Bombs planted
530Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,737inferno
3,667nuke
1,318dust2
1,121vertigo
374train
67lake
25office
8italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

324Matches
47%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
77.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2454%1.1616.8
Mirage1765%1.4016.6
Anubis1741%0.8712.3
Nuke1567%1.3414.4
Inferno1354%1.3615.8
Dust2956%1.3914.9
Cache825%0.9518.0
Vertigo1100%0.9518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
611msReaction time
12.8%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
7.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.7916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0317%22 Oct →
dust210–130.015%22 Oct →
cache13–100.0411%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0216%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.0119%4 Oct →
inferno2–130.0411%3 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.097%1 Oct →
cache7–130.0013%1 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0219%29 Sept →
mirage13–80.0122%6 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0720%2 Sept →
cache13–30.0319%2 Sept →
anubis8–130.0016%2 Sept →
inferno9–20.0115%1 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0520%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0521%30 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0321%29 Aug →
cache12–4-0.039%29 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0319%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0120%29 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0620%29 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0424%29 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0113%26 Aug →
nuke10–130.0222%26 Aug →
ancient16–130.0425%26 Aug →
inferno13–80.0235%26 Aug →
anubis14–160.0514%24 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0325%24 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0718%24 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0122%19 Aug →
inferno13–10.0016%19 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0221%19 Aug →
ancient16–130.0322%19 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.1424%19 Aug →
inferno9–60.0426%19 Aug →
poseidon9–6-0.1314%19 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0413%15 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0516%15 Aug →
nuke13–60.0222%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0219%13 Aug →
cache13–60.1128%13 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0617%13 Aug →
dust29–130.0023%10 Aug →
cache13–40.0324%10 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0121%10 Aug →
ancient13–70.019%10 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0311%10 Aug →
inferno13–60.0510%8 Aug →
cache13–90.1022%8 Aug →
mirage5–130.0623%8 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0311%8 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0219%4 Aug →
nuke13–0-0.0221%4 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0611%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0423%4 Aug →
inferno13–110.0420%4 Aug →
inferno16–130.0514%31 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0211%31 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0210%31 Jul →
inferno6–130.0125%31 Jul →
ancient14–160.0114%31 Jul →
ancient13–80.0721%31 Jul →
mirage13–80.0238%30 Jul →
ancient13–80.0115%30 Jul →
anubis11–130.0124%30 Jul →
nuke13–90.0329%30 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0431%30 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0918%18 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0622%18 Jul →
ancient13–70.0112%17 Jul →
mirage13–100.0633%17 Jul →
ancient13–110.0013%17 Jul →
ancient13–80.0116%17 Jul →
mirage13–90.1223%17 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0020%17 Jul →
mirage13–0-0.0210%10 Jul →
anubis13–90.0314%10 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0124%10 Jul →
nuke11–130.0412%10 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0226%9 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0114%9 Jul →
cache13–60.019%9 Jul →
inferno12–160.0427%9 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0421%5 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0421%5 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0316%5 Jul →
inferno13–10.0727%5 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0014%30 Jun →
dust28–13-0.022%30 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0315%30 Jun →
ancient5–130.0650%30 Jun →
mirage8–130.0520%28 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0117%18 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.054%18 Jun →
ancient13–70.0213%18 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0026%18 Jun →
ancient13–110.0642%18 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0418%17 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0419%17 Jun →
mirage13–40.0413%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.