Pa$cher

Pa$cher — CS2 Stats

76561199235392015[U:1:1275126287]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

749Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,526Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating21,580Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#58960 of 247866 tracked
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,580 -2,037 21 Feb – 30 Sept · 14 days played
15,10924,524peak 24,52421 Feb30 Sept
24,901Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-02-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,944 below peak (24,524)
  • +6,471 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,420 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate33.0%46.9%49.2%16.2% short
Shot accuracy6.8%13.0%13.4%6.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.081.120.29 short
Match win rate43.2%46.7%48.5%5.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Red band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPa$cherPREMIER21,580 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim99
Positioning44
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–40–3Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · +11.9pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.9
Utility3.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 55 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9
Positioning4.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time412ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 486ms → last ⅓ avg 412ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 15–15 · dust2, 31 Aug →
71%Best headshot accuracy · 3–2 · dust2, 23 Feb →
203msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

16Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–0In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8dust2Weakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2113–862%0.03
dust2C219–1243%0.07
nukeB189–950%0.01
mirageA95–456%0.05
infernoC94–544%0.02
ancientS87–188%0.06
officeA85–363%-0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.05
cache—22–0100%0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,430Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,173Matches
43.2%Match win rate
33.0%Headshot %
6.8%Shot accuracy
3,669MVPs
724Hours (in match)
1,907Bombs planted
222Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,050office
2,825nuke
2,370dust2
1,797vertigo
1,216inferno
60dust
32train
4lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

140Matches
44%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
65.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4445%0.8514.2
Nuke3456%0.7511.9
Dust23339%0.6812.2
Mirage1718%0.528.8
Vertigo875%0.9414.0
Inferno30%0.386.0
Ancient10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
43.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
4.7°Preaim
429msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
9.53HE damage / grenade
5.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4524 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7696% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–20.1158%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.1636%30 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.086%30 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0710%25 Sept →
dust213–20.060%25 Sept →
dust21–130.0021%25 Sept →
mirage3–00.3460%25 Sept →
cache8–4-0.0242%25 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0850%25 Sept →
mirage13–20.0520%25 Sept →
office2–13-0.0723%24 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.1411%23 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0720%23 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.050%23 Sept →
office4–13-0.070%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0344%17 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.1110%17 Sept →
anubis13–20.1146%13 Sept →
ancient13–50.026%12 Sept →
mirage6–10.0425%12 Sept →
anubis7–130.0427%12 Sept →
anubis13–40.1224%12 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0221%12 Sept →
anubis13–10.0940%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0117%12 Sept →
office13–110.0213%10 Sept →
office13–80.1332%7 Sept →
ancient5–130.017%7 Sept →
dust25–130.0929%7 Sept →
dust28–20.0639%7 Sept →
dust27–130.0822%6 Sept →
anubis13–40.1221%6 Sept →
anubis13–20.0812%6 Sept →
nuke13–10.1417%6 Sept →
inferno13–60.1322%6 Sept →
anubis13–70.0215%6 Sept →
anubis13–10.0648%6 Sept →
dust213–100.0933%6 Sept →
ancient13–70.0617%5 Sept →
nuke16–140.1121%5 Sept →
nuke13–30.1433%5 Sept →
dust213–00.2933%4 Sept →
ancient16–140.0733%4 Sept →
cache13–30.0621%4 Sept →
dust213–20.1344%4 Sept →
ancient16–130.1517%1 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0330%1 Sept →
inferno5–130.0822%1 Sept →
ancient13–60.1226%31 Aug →
inferno13–10.0438%31 Aug →
anubis13–50.0025%31 Aug →
dust215–150.3929%31 Aug →
nuke13–00.169%31 Aug →
anubis7–130.1245%31 Aug →
office13–6-0.0210%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0815%30 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1720%15 Aug →
mirage13–60.010%14 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0720%14 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0224%13 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0126%13 Aug →
nuke1–7-0.030%11 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.0740%11 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0913%11 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.128%11 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0812%11 Aug →
dust24–13-0.080%9 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.067%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0818%9 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0811%9 Aug →
nuke13–50.1024%5 Jun →
anubis13–90.1524%5 Jun →
mirage9–130.0520%5 Jun →
dust25–130.1031%5 Jun →
dust24–130.0638%11 May →
nuke6–13-0.130%11 May →
anubis13–6-0.043%20 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.059%20 Mar →
office13–10-0.0525%5 Mar →
dust213–90.2128%3 Mar →
dust28–10.1219%3 Mar →
office5–13-0.0615%3 Mar →
dust24–13-0.090%3 Mar →
office13–90.000%3 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0133%23 Feb →
overpass13–100.0014%23 Feb →
anubis1–13-0.0150%23 Feb →
nuke13–10.060%23 Feb →
overpass13–80.0835%23 Feb →
dust23–20.1571%23 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0322%23 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0013%23 Feb →
nuke13–90.0733%22 Feb →
inferno13–90.1133%22 Feb →
overpass13–80.0524%21 Feb →
mirage13–110.0924%21 Feb →
anubis13–60.059%21 Feb →
inferno12–160.127%21 Feb →
nuke15–150.1115%21 Feb →
dust213–30.0220%21 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches16-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.