Z4laz4r

Z4laz4r — CS2 Stats

FI76561199233174774[U:1:1272909046]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,472Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,498Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,120 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,685 +219 22 Dec – 5 Apr · 18 days played
13,24914,556peak 14,55622 Dec5 Apr
14,556Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,120Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2025-12-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,120
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 81 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate60.1%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy8.0%12.0%12.4%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.581.021.03above
Match win rate45.5%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZ4laz4rFACEITLevel 5 · 1,120 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,120csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning62
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateWLLWWLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.2
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning6.2
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time601ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 16 Feb →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · anubis, 25 Feb →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · anubis, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 29 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 50% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2413–1154%-0.01
mirageA2011–955%-0.02
infernoA1810–856%-0.01
anubisS1510–567%-0.01
ancientB126–650%-0.03
dust2A53–260%0.01
overpass—42–250%-0.01
cache—11–0100%0.03
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,435Lifetime kills
1.58K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
3,113Matches
45.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
60.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
8.0%Shot accuracy
6,260MVPs
1,376Hours (in match)
2,333Bombs planted
1,187Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,401
AWP7,645
FAMAS2,572
MP92,056
MAC-101,938

Lifetime map wins

7,018nuke
6,078inferno
2,410vertigo
2,188dust2
808train
108cbble
48office
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

758Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
77.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18347%0.9414.0
Nuke11554%1.0115.2
Inferno11048%0.9914.6
Ancient9949%1.0315.4
Anubis7859%1.0016.3
Dust25946%0.9013.6
Vertigo2361%0.8913.8
Overpass2045%0.9415.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
591msReaction time
57.7%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
8.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4793 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0617%17 Oct →
anubis13–160.0019%8 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0520%7 Oct →
ancient13–110.0114%7 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0220%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0712%7 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0616%7 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0016%7 Oct →
nuke12–120.0423%6 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0423%6 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0224%6 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0417%5 Oct →
ancient5–130.0224%5 Oct →
inferno16–19-0.0616%5 Oct →
nuke7–130.0219%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0310%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0411%30 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.079%30 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0814%30 Sept →
nuke16–120.0415%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.0029%11 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0122%11 Sept →
inferno13–60.0626%11 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0410%2 Aug →
cache13–60.0310%31 May →
nuke9–130.0315%5 Apr →
anubis13–90.0122%5 Apr →
mirage13–60.0126%5 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.1211%5 Apr →
inferno13–60.0621%5 Apr →
inferno8–130.0017%5 Apr →
dust213–160.0431%24 Mar →
nuke13–90.0013%24 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0424%4 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0419%3 Mar →
anubis13–70.0511%1 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.0338%25 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0422%24 Feb →
dust21–13-0.0617%21 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0324%21 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0313%19 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0710%19 Feb →
overpass13–70.0323%19 Feb →
ancient13–70.0620%18 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0019%17 Feb →
mirage16–14-0.0110%16 Feb →
nuke13–40.1129%16 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0719%16 Feb →
nuke13–3-0.0620%10 Feb →
inferno10–130.0621%10 Feb →
mirage16–14-0.0813%9 Feb →
anubis13–30.0414%9 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0426%7 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0421%6 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0413%3 Feb →
anubis8–10.0129%3 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.1015%2 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0223%2 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0813%1 Feb →
anubis13–90.0016%1 Feb →
mirage13–100.0420%1 Feb →
nuke13–1-0.0027%29 Jan →
overpass13–7-0.074%29 Jan →
mirage13–110.0026%28 Jan →
anubis11–130.005%28 Jan →
anubis13–11-0.0111%28 Jan →
nuke7–1-0.0427%28 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0115%28 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0218%27 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0324%27 Jan →
anubis13–11-0.0832%26 Jan →
anubis6–13-0.0215%26 Jan →
ancient13–4-0.0411%26 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0016%26 Jan →
nuke10–130.0322%12 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.0230%12 Jan →
mirage15–150.0319%11 Jan →
nuke13–60.0212%9 Jan →
train10–13-0.0311%7 Jan →
mirage13–60.016%5 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.0736%5 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0117%5 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0518%5 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0219%5 Jan →
overpass8–130.0337%4 Jan →
inferno13–110.0111%4 Jan →
inferno13–70.0315%4 Jan →
nuke13–90.0023%4 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0212%31 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.0312%31 Dec →
ancient6–3-0.1019%30 Dec →
dust213–110.0815%30 Dec →
mirage9–130.0416%30 Dec →
inferno13–8-0.019%30 Dec →
mirage8–13-0.0723%22 Dec →
dust213–90.0116%22 Dec →
dust213–2-0.0210%22 Dec →
inferno9–13-0.0124%22 Dec →
nuke13–3-0.0323%22 Dec →
inferno13–3-0.0319%22 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.