Tamaleking

Tamaleking — CS2 Stats

76561199230044090[U:1:1269778362]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,464Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,143Hours in CS105Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1274Premier CS Rating · 16,274 → 15,000

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +4,018 31 Aug – 17 Oct · 16 days played
10,98218,202peak 18,20231 Aug17 Oct
18,510Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,202 below peak (18,202)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate46.4%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy1.4%12.2%11.3%9.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.960.980.990.03 short
Match win rate47.6%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTamalekingFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning54
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time586ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 7–3 · rush_001, 3 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–3 · rush_001, 3 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
14–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC188–1044%0.01
dust2A159–660%0.00
ancientD134–931%-0.02
nukeS139–469%-0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.02
infernoS128–467%-0.03
mirageD113–827%-0.04
rush_001A53–260%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,443Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,969Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1.4%Shot accuracy
5,643MVPs
1,192Hours (in match)
3,477Bombs planted
872Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,087
AWP8,289
MAC-101,647
MP91,643
FAMAS1,556
MP7773

Lifetime map wins

5,540dust2
4,148nuke
4,021inferno
654train
500vertigo
190office
37italy
6cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
73.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2357%0.8713.5
Dust21839%0.9213.6
Ancient1331%0.8514.1
Inferno1275%1.0316.3
Anubis1250%1.0015.1
Cache1250%0.9814.0
Nuke862%1.2815.6
Overpass367%1.1716.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
579msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
10.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4627 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0533% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.028%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0120%17 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0112%17 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0317%17 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0510%17 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0126%16 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0510%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0122%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.048%15 Oct →
cache16–130.1033%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0615%15 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0314%15 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.016%15 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.037%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0912%15 Oct →
mirage10–130.0213%15 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0015%15 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0418%13 Oct →
inferno13–110.0122%13 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0321%13 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0325%13 Oct →
cache13–9-0.017%12 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0712%12 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0114%12 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.109%12 Oct →
nuke16–140.0219%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.057%11 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.104%11 Oct →
cache9–130.0416%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0518%11 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0215%11 Oct →
anubis13–50.0117%11 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0814%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.065%11 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0017%11 Oct →
dust213–100.014%10 Oct →
inferno13–10.059%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0614%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.059%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0214%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0311%10 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0413%10 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.104%10 Oct →
ancient13–60.0614%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0321%9 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0111%9 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0513%9 Oct →
dust213–80.0917%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0320%9 Oct →
cache11–13-0.017%9 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0711%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0016%8 Oct →
mirage13–20.030%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.057%8 Oct →
cache13–90.0912%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0813%8 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0218%8 Oct →
anubis13–110.0414%8 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0417%8 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.038%8 Oct →
dust213–30.0012%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0523%7 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0210%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.129%7 Oct →
ancient13–70.009%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0315%7 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0518%7 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0222%7 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0615%7 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0513%7 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0312%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.068%6 Oct →
nuke13–110.0013%6 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0120%6 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0215%6 Oct →
cache13–50.1019%6 Oct →
ancient11–130.0118%6 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0310%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0514%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0414%5 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0411%5 Oct →
dust27–13-0.069%5 Oct →
anubis13–70.0513%5 Oct →
ancient1–130.048%5 Oct →
nuke6–130.039%5 Oct →
cache2–100.0617%5 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0213%4 Oct →
cache9–130.039%4 Oct →
anubis16–120.036%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0515%4 Oct →
rush_0017–30.1350%3 Oct →
rush_0015–10.0220%3 Oct →
rush_0015–10.035%3 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.0250%3 Oct →
rush_0016–80.0420%3 Oct →
dust216–130.0816%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0215%2 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0218%2 Oct →
cache6–130.0112%2 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.