LIL WAAAA

LIL WAAAA — CS2 Stats

FI76561199226260351[U:1:1265994623]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,471Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,864Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,452Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38787 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,471 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,452 +3,013 26 Aug – 31 Oct · 27 days played
19,12923,452peak 23,45226 Aug31 Oct
23,695Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,270Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,452
  • +3,205 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,548 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6——
Win rate67%——
K/D0.89——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 29 Oct 2026 → 5 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate54.6%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.8%12.4%12.7%9.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.901.031.05above
Match win rate54.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLIL WAAAAFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,452 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,270csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 11 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 12 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 12 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB178–947%-0.00
nukeS1611–569%0.04
infernoA1610–663%0.00
ancientB158–753%0.04
anubisC135–838%0.01
cacheA117–464%0.03
dust2C94–544%0.01
train—20–20%0.04
vertigo—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,685Lifetime kills
1.90K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
5,824Matches
54.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players
54.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2.8%Shot accuracy
37,815MVPs
1,650Hours (in match)
9,272Bombs planted
11,656Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,034
AWP19,291
MP93,062
SSG 082,922
MAC-101,534

Lifetime map wins

10,803inferno
7,637nuke
7,360vertigo
3,598dust2
1,717train
1,588office
105italy
100aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
56%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2255%0.8713.4
Ancient1759%1.1813.6
Nuke1573%0.9212.7
Anubis1457%1.1315.1
Mirage933%0.9013.7
Vertigo862%0.8713.3
Dust230%0.5510.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
568msReaction time
57.2%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.47HE damage / grenade
10.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.8631% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.0430%29 Oct →
nuke13–40.0825%29 Oct →
nuke16–140.0321%29 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0611%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0319%29 Oct →
mirage13–60.0719%29 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0313%27 Oct →
dust25–130.0019%27 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0016%27 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0511%24 Oct →
inferno13–90.0521%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0328%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.0732%24 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0220%19 Oct →
ancient11–130.0114%19 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0018%19 Oct →
dust28–130.0719%18 Oct →
nuke13–50.1224%18 Oct →
anubis13–110.0321%18 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0523%18 Oct →
ancient13–90.0519%18 Oct →
ancient13–60.0819%18 Oct →
inferno10–130.0218%17 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0523%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.0129%17 Oct →
inferno13–110.0428%16 Oct →
ancient15–150.0727%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.0423%15 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0124%15 Oct →
cache13–60.0622%15 Oct →
ancient6–130.0311%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0417%15 Oct →
cache4–130.0525%15 Oct →
cache13–100.0526%15 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0317%13 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0014%13 Oct →
mirage8–130.0318%13 Oct →
anubis13–90.0619%13 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0520%13 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0117%12 Oct →
dust213–110.1024%12 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0118%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0234%12 Oct →
ancient13–00.2318%11 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0722%11 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0023%11 Oct →
mirage13–00.0521%11 Oct →
nuke13–60.1023%11 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0326%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0720%11 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0226%10 Oct →
mirage13–10.0530%10 Oct →
ancient13–60.0723%10 Oct →
nuke6–130.0219%10 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0415%10 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0011%9 Oct →
cache16–120.0510%9 Oct →
inferno13–40.0611%9 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0611%9 Oct →
nuke16–140.0213%9 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0426%9 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0211%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.0810%7 Oct →
anubis13–100.0323%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.0518%7 Oct →
train10–130.0416%7 Oct →
train3–130.0322%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0321%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0532%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0910%6 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0317%6 Oct →
mirage8–130.0318%6 Oct →
nuke10–130.0019%1 Oct →
dust22–130.0031%1 Oct →
anubis10–130.0117%1 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0520%1 Oct →
nuke9–130.1016%28 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0011%23 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0123%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0616%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.0416%22 Sept →
anubis13–50.0313%22 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0712%22 Sept →
cache13–100.0122%22 Sept →
nuke13–50.0328%21 Sept →
anubis11–10.077%17 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0311%14 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0323%11 Sept →
nuke13–110.0232%9 Sept →
cache13–100.0623%9 Sept →
nuke13–30.0622%9 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0221%9 Sept →
ancient11–130.0124%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0118%4 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0818%2 Sept →
cache13–160.0520%29 Aug →
nuke5–130.0526%26 Aug →
ancient16–130.0717%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0118%20 Aug →
cache13–110.0224%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.